[Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Lara, Cesar cesar.lara at intel.com
Tue Sep 11 17:43:46 UTC 2018


Hi all, 

Just wanted to point out that, to be able to reproduce the issues from Intel's ISO, somebody will need to go and create a build environment from scratch, using external upstream repositories to generate a new mirror, just the way we are doing it in our environment. Failing to do this will result in a apples to oranges comparison.

Regards 
Cesar Lara

-----Original Message-----
From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 10:54 AM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel <Michel.Thebeau at windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Hi Ghada,

Yes, before shared our ISOs I followed such steps and got the same issues.

As I mention in the issue (https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790213), I could get the ISO from Michel and testes in our infrastructure, issues not found. I guess there are differences between the way an ISO is built by Intel and Wind River since Intel got issues but Wind River does not. I think we should sync about this.

Besides, our test infrastructure uses other commands to generate VMs, add/install hosts (controllers and computes), such commands was gotten from "tic_vb" repo, such repo was given by China team, if I am not wrong such repo was based on Wind River documentation; our test framework is based on "tic_vb". Anyway both ways got the same results.

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso

-----Original Message-----
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 8:53 AM
To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel <Michel.Thebeau at windriver.com>
Subject: RE: [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Hello Juan,
I read the notes in the Launchpad.

And, just to confirm, are you following the instructions under:  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Installation_Guide_Virtual_Environment/Controller_Storage
and still reproducing the two issues below?

I was not able to definitively tell from the Launchpad notes. It's important that both our teams are comparing apples to apples.

Thanks,
Ghada

-----Original Message-----
From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso at intel.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2018 1:50 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, Ada; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel
Subject: RE: [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Hi,

Such launchpads were updated.

A VM was set to upload the ISO tx-2018-08-28-88.iso, such ISO present two issues. Michael will upload his ISO, then we will re test witch each iso in our environment.

An script is being developed to get the differences between ISOs.

Regards.
Juan Carlos Alonso

-----Original Message-----
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 7, 2018 4:43 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones at intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Thebeau, Michel <Michel.Thebeau at windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Hi Elio/Ada,
Are there any updates from your side on these two Launchpads?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790213
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790716

Michel Thebeau (Wind River) has been trying to reproduce these two issues (following the starlingx wikis) without success for two days now. He has been adding his findings to the bugs and communicating with your team. 
As a result of his investigation, he will be pushing some small fixes to stx-tools shortly (some cleanup).

Please let us know if you need any further help from us.

Thanks,
Ghada

-----Original Message-----
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 5:39 PM
To: Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, Ada; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Please see inline. There are notes in all the launchpads as well.

I have tagged the last bug for the October release. The rest need more information to determine whether they gate or not: two maybe procedural and one requires more information.

-----Original Message-----
From: Martinez Monroy, Elio [mailto:elio.martinez.monroy at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2018 2:23 PM
To: Jones, Bruce E; Cabrales, Ada; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

My opinion below

-----Original Message-----
From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 12:56 PM
To: Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Should the bugs coming out of this be tagged/fixed for the October release? 

Related bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790213 < --- Must, this bug is related with 2nd controller provisioning [[GK]] Using the instructions published on the wiki, our designer was not able to reproduce this issue. What instructions are the test team using?

https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790514 < --- Can wait until other issues are solved, will fail some test cases related to SSH [[GK]] Requested more information. This cannot be debugged further without this information.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790716 < --- Must, all instances need at least one compute for multimode [[GK]] Using the instructions published on the wiki, our designer was not able to reproduce this issue. The test team points to internal instructions which we have no access to. The supported install recipes need to be on the wiki. I think it is an invalid bug

https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1790718 < --- Can wait since is related to FM , test cases will fail [[GK]] As Brent pointed out, this is dependent on the integration of stx-gui which is in progress. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Cabrales, Ada [mailto:ada.cabrales at intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 10:50 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] Sanity results - summary posted

Hello all,

    As mentioned on the project meeting today, we're posting the summary of the sanity test runs on the Test wiki [0]. The sanity is triggered each time an ISO is generated (a daily task).

   Right now we are posting the results manually, and working on a way for automating it. Logs of the run are not included, if you want to have them, you can contact Elio to get them sent to you. 


[0] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Test#Latest_ISO_image_Sanity_Summary

Regards
Ada

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list