[Starlingx-discuss] Analysis of patch 4ae5a58 for StartlingX upstreaming

Peters, Matt Matt.Peters at windriver.com
Tue Sep 18 15:14:39 UTC 2018

Hi Ildikó,
This RFE is specific to neutron, therefore I think it makes sense to publish this to the neutron-specs for review rather than the stx-specs.  I do agree that the mailing list is not the best way to exchange review comments and makes sense to ensure the docs are pushed to an appropriate spec repo as soon as possible.

Regards, Matt

On 2018-09-18, 3:46 AM, "Ildiko Vancsa" <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com> wrote:

    I think the attached document would be a great candidate to be proposed as a spec to stx-specs. That way you can send out the link to the Gerrit review which works better with the mail archive as well as it is accessible from there too.
    Gerrit also helps with reviews but doesn’t force you to keep all the discussions there you can always reference the review link in mail threads.
    What do you think about moving the document there?
    > On 2018. Sep 17., at 9:17, Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu at intel.com> wrote:
    > Hi Matt,
    > We analyze the patch 4ae5a58 related to l2pop. An RFE has been written(You can find it in the attachment). Could you please help to review and comment? Thanks very much!
    > Best Regards,
    > Xu, Chenjie
    > <RFE_EXTEND_L2POP_FDB_INFORMATION.docx>_______________________________________________
    > Starlingx-discuss mailing list
    > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
    > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list