[Starlingx-discuss] Bootstrap playbook relocation
Tee.Ngo at windriver.com
Mon Jun 17 16:48:21 UTC 2019
Hi Dean, Jeremy, Scott,
Could you do what are necessary to have the new repo up with git history. A few developers are waiting to update/add new playbooks to this repo.
From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little at windriver.com]
Sent: June-17-19 11:07 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Bootstrap playbook relocation
Well, so as long as the Tee, and the authors of these reviews (if
different), and any other interested parties are all aware of the
forthcoming history rewrite, I won't object. The interested community
should be small for such a new repo.
On 2019-06-14 9:05 p.m., Penney, Don wrote:
> I see the following:
> 2dc3228 Add .gitignore to ansible-stx-playbooks repo
> d3360f6 Populate stx-ansible-playbooks repo
> 6bef82a Initial zuul / TOX setup
> 4266117 Added .gitreview
> The second one on the list, d3360f6, was just moving the playbookconfig dir from stx-config, and population the centos_iso_image.inc and centos_pkg_dirs files for the build. I believe the first and second ones were also just copies of the files in stx-config, setting up the repo.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Troyer [mailto:dtroyer at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:16 PM
> To: Jeremy Stanley
> Cc: starlingx
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Bootstrap playbook relocation
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:44 PM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>> Once you have an external, publicly cloneable repo somewhere from
>> which I can pull the new refs, I'm happy push --force those over top
>> of the old content. Or if you prefer, you can propose a temporary
>> ACL change for that repo in openstack/project-config to grant some
>> Gerrit group you're in access to do the same, and I'll be glad to
>> review/approve it.
> Thanks Jeremy, I imagine we'll create it in starlingx-staging and push
> from there. It sounds like we'll see what Scott wants to do on
> There are 4 merged reviews in that project now, I know we'll have to
> re-create them. After a force-push will they still have anything
> interesting? I don't think it will be a big deal, just curious.
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
More information about the Starlingx-discuss