[Starlingx-discuss] Test Case Submission in rst format

Cabrales, Ada ada.cabrales at intel.com
Wed Mar 13 21:01:07 UTC 2019


Well, based on the amount of work that rst formatting is requiring, and being as close as we are to the release testing, I support the submission of manual test cases (to our repo) using txt format. 

We can continue the effort of translating those into rst in the following months, so we can align to the project documentation standards. 

Please raise the concerns you might have regarding this topic
Ada

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arce Moreno, Abraham
> Sent: Friday, March 8, 2019 3:45 PM
> To: Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed at windriver.com>; Cabrales, Ada
> <ada.cabrales at intel.com>; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: RE: Test Case Submission in rst format
> 
> Hi Numan,
> 
> > We are currently in process of submitting our test cases in stx-test
> > git repository. There has been a request to upload manual tests is rst
> > format so that they can be visible on a wiki.
> 
> Thanks to you and all test team for all the support to take advantage of existing
> documentation infrastructure and give it a try to have it under our official
> documentation channel at starlingx.io
> 
> > Conversion of test cases from plain text format to rst format is
> > causing a lot of pain and time lost. At the same time it is also not
> > an absolute requirement as any tester who wants to execute these test
> > cases can easily access them from git in text format.
> 
> We understand this is a time consuming process considering the number of test
> cases you have and the ramp up in the learning of the RST format if automated
> tools are not used. Agree that the format is not relevant to execute a test case.
> 
> > I am not sure about how much time is spent by Ada's team in converting
> > these test cases but I would suggest that we should submit them in
> > plain text format and if documentation team wants to convert them in
> > rst then they can update them.
> 
> Let's add this option to the table. At the end, you as a team has the final decision
> and decide what is the best approach that works for you, here you have the
> existing
> options:
> 
> [ Option A ] Convert all test cases to RST format and merge.
> [ Option B ] Keep all test cases in X format and merge.
> [ Option C ] Only merge what has been converted to RST format.
> 
> There is no right option, again, it all depends on the needs and priorities of the
> team, your call.
> 
> > Secondly, if these test cases are to be shown in Wiki, what is your
> > plan for showing them in next release?
> 
> The test cases could land (one commit away to make this happen) under our
> official StarlingX documentation site at: https://docs.starlingx.io/
> 
> Our proposal is to add "Test" down to "Tools", under "There are several
> supporting projects and repositories":
> 
> - Tools < pointing to https://docs.starlingx.io/stx-tools/index.html
> - Test < pointing to https://docs.starlingx.io/stx-test/index.html
> 
> This way we are taking full advantage of the StarlingX documentation
> infrastructure based in OpenStack guidelines and giving a standard and formal
> way to present it to the community.
> 
> > Would there be a release specific Wiki or a selection available to
> > check test cases for each release?
> 
> We can discuss what are your needs in terms of versioning in our weekly
> meeting.
> As an example, we are currently working to split the installation documentation
> in 2 versions based in "directories":
> 
> 1. Version one: old way to deploy StarlingX 2. Version two: new containerized
> way to deploy StarlingX
> 
> More information about this "versioning" task under our meeting minutes here:
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation
> 
> Please let us know any other question you might have. More than happy to
> support your team objectives.



More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list