[Starlingx-discuss] swift enabling

Chen, Haochuan Z haochuan.z.chen at intel.com
Thu Nov 28 02:11:33 UTC 2019


Hi

I find there is voice to enable swift, why it was removed?

Thanks!


Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600
From: joji vlogs <ji at sibyl.li>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
	<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage
Message-ID:
	<CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all,

I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand.

My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error.

Thank you and have a great day!



Message: 3
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 14:14:15 +0000
From: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
	<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX 2.0: swift?
Message-ID: <DB39DAB5F762704A93D316F9CE7D021E42929584 at emilio.sis.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

hi,
how can i add the object storage (swift) feature to my current STX2.0 openstack?


BR!

Martin, Chen
SSP, Software Engineer
021-61164330

-----Original Message-----
From: starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:05 AM
To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150

Send Starlingx-discuss mailing list submissions to
	starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	starlingx-discuss-request at lists.starlingx.io

You can reach the person managing the list at
	starlingx-discuss-owner at lists.starlingx.io

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Starlingx-discuss digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: controller filesystem (Waines, Greg)
   2. Enabling Object Storage (joji vlogs)
   3. Re: <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account Locked for User (Andy Ning)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 13:26:31 +0000
From: "Waines, Greg" <Greg.Waines at windriver.com>
To: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>, "von Hoesslin, Volker"
	<Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun at intel.com>,
	"starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
	<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal"
	<kristal.dale at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem
Message-ID: <B514CD7A-7A7F-4051-9A62-F62193853B41 at windriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Actually a section on managing filesystems on the controllers is planned for STX 3.0 ... based on the proposed TOC for the new Operations Guide.
Greg

From: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
Date: Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 12:13 PM
To: "von Hoesslin, Volker" <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun at intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>, "Dale, Kristal" <kristal.dale at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem

Kristal:

We probably need a Story/Task added to the documentation to get the documentation of host-fs added in the right place.  This helps with filesystem re-sizing.

Maybe it's already there.

Sau!

On 11/21/19 7:12 AM, von Hoesslin, Volker wrote:
incredible !!! thats the point i have search! big thx!
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Von:* Sun, Austin [austin.sun at intel.com<mailto:austin.sun at intel.com>]
*Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. November 2019 15:20
*An:* von Hoesslin, Volker; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
*Betreff:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem Hi Volker:
  From the email chain,
http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-August/005656.html
You can probably the command line to change the size of docker lv Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun.
*From:* von Hoesslin, Volker <Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de<mailto:Volker.Hoesslin at swsn.de>>
*Sent:* Thursday, November 21, 2019 9:20 PM
*To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
*Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] controller filesystem hi, i trying to import some existing qcow2 images into my new installed STX 2.0.
openstack image create --file /media/foobar.qcow2 --private --unprotected --disk-format qcow2 "foobar"
all works fine, the image are available.
now, i'm trying to create an new volume based on this images. if the images are <=6GB all works fine, but some images are very huge
(10-200GB) and then it ends in an error. after some research i can see on controller the mount point
/dev/mapper/cgts--vg-docker--lv      30G   11G   20G  35% /var/lib/docker
increase the used storage. after fail "volume create" it goes back to given value 35%. in my oppinion, this mount point should resize to some value about 300-400GB, but how? in STX horizon backend
(http://10.10.10.2:8080/admin/system_config/?tab=system_config_tab__storage_table)
there is an "docker-distribution", but no docker-mount-point itself?
btw, if i try to change the "docker-distribution" value to some other value (eg. 500GB via horizon backend), i got this error:
*Error: *backup size of 60 is insufficient for host controller-1.
Minimum backup size of 100 is required based upon glance size 20 and database size 20. Rejecting modification request.
- see attachment -
how can i increase the backup size to handle this error?!
greez & thx, volker...
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/053843ae/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 07:53:31 -0600
From: joji vlogs <ji at sibyl.li>
To: "starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io"
	<starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Enabling Object Storage
Message-ID:
	<CAHQOA=hsC+wQf+MOVLx6iPziPBvmqtbJJ4saogGqgTnb4byB_g at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all,

I recently did a test deployment based on a 2+2+2 setup with one minor difference being I only have one storage server on hand.

My question is how would I go about enabling object storage? I saw a reference to it in the helm charts and attempted to set an override but the APIs would not be listening for requests and a "unable to get swift service info" error.

Thank you and have a great day!
Austin Gillmann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/attachments/20191125/7f40d408/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:05:19 -0500
From: Andy Ning <andy.ning at windriver.com>
To: <starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] <BLOCKING> StarlingX 2.0 Account
	Locked for User
Message-ID: <8f8e6cad-0ad7-4be4-6693-a25e6cec93ad at windriver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed



On 2019-11-25 12:00 AM, Yong Hu wrote:
> Hi Anirudh,
>
> This issue is similar to this LP#1853017 [0], which was triggered the 
> account locking if the password of Openstack user "admin" was changed.
> In this LP, for unknown reason, "registry-token-server" daemon kept 
> accessing "keystone" on host (not the instance in containers) with 
> obsolete token and led to "admin" account locked after 5 attempts.
>
If registry token server keeps on accessing keystone with obsolete token, this could be a bug in the token server. Normally if a keystone client get a failed authentication, it should try to retrieve a new token by using username/password.

Andy

> Right now, I am debugging this issue.
> Good thing is Cengn build 11/16 seemed not to have such a problem 
> (LP#1853017).
>
> You might have a try with this version?
> BTW: which cengn build were you using?
>
>
> [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853017
>
> regards,
> Yong
>
> On 2019/11/19 6:06 PM, Anirudh Gupta wrote:
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> I have installed StarlingX 2.0 Duplex Bare Metal.
>>
>> I am trying to create 2 VM’s and repeating this cycle a number of times.
>>
>> After using the setup for around half and hour, I am not longer able 
>> to access the GUI.
>>
>> Ever though I type correct Username/Password, it gives an error of 
>> Invalid Credentials.
>>
>> Then, I thought to use the CLI commands by following LOAD CLI section 
>> given in link
>>
>> https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r2_release/openstack/
>> access.html#local-cli
>>
>>
>> But with this also, I am facing the same error
>>
>> controller-0:~$ export OS_CLOUD=openstack_helm
>>
>> controller-0:~$ openstack endpoint list
>>
>> The account is locked for user: 230578cde382430a8adac399afab1230. 
>> (HTTP 401) (Request-ID: req-6da6d59a-2edd-4f2b-a8bf-f13f2e423a77)
>>
>> Earlier this automatically started working after 5-7 mins.
>>
>> But this time, I am completely Blocked.
>>
>> I have also raised a bug regarding the same
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1853093
>>
>> Please suggest some pointers, so that I can unblock and resume my 
>> activities.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Anirudh Gupta
>>
>> DISCLAIMER: This electronic message and all of its contents, contains 
>> information which is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected 
>> from disclosure. The information contained in this electronic mail 
>> transmission is intended for use only by the individual or entity to 
>> which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or may 
>> have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please 
>> notify the sender immediately and delete / destroy all copies of this 
>> electronic mail transmission without disclosing, copying, 
>> distributing, forwarding, printing or retaining any part of it.
>> Hughes Systique accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising 
>> from the use of the information transmitted by this email including 
>> damage from virus.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

--
Andy Ning
Cube: 3071
Tel: 613-9631408 (int: 4408)
Skype: andy.ning.wr




------------------------------

Subject: Digest Footer

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss


------------------------------

End of Starlingx-discuss Digest, Vol 18, Issue 150
**************************************************


More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list