[Starlingx-discuss] Problem with STX 5.0 builds from CENGN

Scott Little scott.little at windriver.com
Sat May 15 18:41:29 UTC 2021


I can confirm the build is now using the intended branch.

The following packages were 'rolled back' to these earlier versions ...

cgts-client-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm
cgts-client-wheels-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm
collectd-extensions-1.0-0.tis.60.x86_64.rpm
controllerconfig-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm
controllerconfig-wheels-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm
distributedcloud-client-dcmanagerclient-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-client-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dccommon-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcdbsync-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcmanager-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcorch-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
fm-api-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-api-doc-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-api-wheels-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-doc-1.0-36.tis.x86_64.rpm
io-scheduler-1.0-2.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-common-dev-1.0-139.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-debuginfo-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-dev-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-hostw-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-hwmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-lmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-pmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-client-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-common-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-plugins-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-tools-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-vim-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-wheels-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
pam-config-1.0-7.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-extracfgs-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-pxeboot-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-controller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-noncontroller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-wheels-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
playbookconfig-1.0-518.tis.x86_64.rpm
puppet-manifests-1.0.0-754.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-wheels-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-wheels-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-oidc-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-oidc-wheels-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-openstack-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-openstack-wheels-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-portieris-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-portieris-wheels-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-wheels-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-rook-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-rook-wheels-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-vault-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-vault-wheels-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm
sm-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm
sm-debuginfo-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm
starlingx-dashboard-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm
starlingx-dashboard-wheels-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-cert-manager-helm-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-oidc-auth-helm-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-openstack-helm-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-portieris-helm-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-ptp-notification-helm-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-rook-ceph-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm
sysinv-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm
sysinv-wheels-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm
systemd-config-1.0-9.tis.noarch.rpm
tsconfig-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm
tsconfig-wheels-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm
vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm
workerconfig-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm
workerconfig-standalone-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm
workerconfig-subfunction-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm





On 2021-05-14 4:19 p.m., Scott Little wrote:
> I regret to say that all STX 5.0 build to date have been invalid.
>
> They have been picking up unintended content from the master branch.
>
> The problem was first spotted several weeks ago, and we thought we had 
> it fixed, but it turns out a build optimization has kept the the 
> invalid content in place, rather than overwriting it with the correct 
> STX.5.0 content.
>
> I'm working to fix fully this time.  Expect to see a few unscheduled 
> builds this weekend.  I'll let you know when I'm confident of the result.
>
> With apologies,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss





More information about the Starlingx-discuss mailing list