From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Aug 1 14:21:16 2023 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 14:21:16 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20230731T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2023 July 31 (https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230731T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] DX sanity Passed: 19 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 19 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_swact_controller_platform PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_standby PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-True] PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-False] PASS test_force_reboot_host[standby_controller-False] PASS test_bmc_verify_bm_type_ipmi PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Wed Aug 2 14:17:42 2023 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 14:17:42 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity and Regression - StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build [20230731T060000Z] results - Jul - 31 Message-ID: Hi all, StarlingX + STX-Openstack sanity and regression results: Overall Status: RED Build Info: Build date: July 31 - 20230731T060000Z ISO: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230731T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Helm Chart: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230731T060000Z/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-1.stx.63-debian-stable-versioned.tgz AIO-DX Baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=OVS Sanity Results: Overall Status: RED Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 9 (60.0%) Failed: 6 (40.0%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20230801 12:47:22 test_ssh_to_hosts FAIL 20230801 12:48:41 test_lock_unlock_host FAIL 20230801 12:51:32 test_openstack_services_healthy FAIL 20230801 12:53:38 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS 20230801 12:59:30 test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] FAIL 20230801 13:22:13 test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS 20230801 13:28:56 test_swact_controllers PASS 20230801 13:36:47 test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] FAIL 20230801 13:42:55 test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS 20230801 13:50:29 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS 20230801 13:54:45 test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL 20230801 13:58:58 test_evacuate_vms PASS 20230801 14:32:09 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS 20230801 14:32:24 test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS 20230801 14:32:30 test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The tcs that failed, except one, reported above are caused by #2029378 - STX | Debian: kubernetes certificates renewal failure on controller-1 the test case: test_horizon_create_delete_instance failed due to #2029376 - External application resources not accessible due to firewall changes Regression Results: Overall Status: YELLOW Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 9 (75.0%) Failed: 3 (25.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20230801 14:38:20 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20230801 14:39:43 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20230801 14:40:44 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20230801 14:50:32 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] FAIL 20230801 15:16:32 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20230801 15:28:22 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20230801 15:31:15 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20230801 15:36:22 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20230801 15:43:34 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20230801 15:48:43 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20230801 15:54:06 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20230801 16:14:50 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The tcs that failed reported above are caused by #2029378 - STX | Debian: kubernetes certificates renewal failure on controller-1 Thanks, STX-Openstack Distro Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Wed Aug 2 14:20:31 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 14:20:31 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: OpenStack Distro Team Call (Aug 01, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-distro-openstack-meetings Minutes from the OpenStack Distro team call Aug 01, 2023 Build: - Build Issues: None Installation: - Installation Issues: None Sanity with stx-openstack (main branch): - Last Successful Execution: (OVS) Tue Jul 11 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: GREEN ??????Sanity - Passed: 15 (100.00%) | Failed: 0 (0.0%) ??????Regression - Passed: 12 (100.00%) | Failed: 0 (0.0%) - Last Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 01 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: RED ??????Sanity - Passed: 9 (60.00%) | Failed: 6 (40.0%) ??????Regression - Passed: 9 (75.00%) | Failed: 3 (25.0%) - Master Build (20230731T060000Z) - Checking the failures - RED sanity might be infrastructure related - Firewall feature side-effect (turning on applyOnForward to true): # LP 2029376 - Bugs Affecting Weekly Sanity/Regression: - No Reproducible bugs currently open. Only intermittent issues # LP 2023657: STX-O| config-out-of-date alarm won't disappear on controller-1 after swact and reapplying app # LP 2012389: STX-Openstack: Failed to activate binding for port for live migration # LP 2007303: STX-Openstack: "nova live-migration" fails to live migrate after host is forcefully turned off/on - STX 9.0 Features Status: - Storyboard/Tasks for containerizing OpenStack clients: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010774 - Majority of the development is done (still using Ussuri based clients inside the container) - Documentation updates submitted: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/889646 - Waiting code review - Follow-up/Improvement tasks: Tasks 48410 and 48411 - Development/Investigation started - Storyboard/Tasks for OpenStack upversion (Antelope): https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010715 - In progress: developer tests with locally built docker images (already upversioned) started today - Locally building the packages: faced an issue with required build dependencies that are higher than our current debian-bullseye.lst entries (oslo-db, sqlalchemy, keystone-auth) - Locally building the docker images: faced similar issue with required build dependencies (upper-constraints mismatches) - pip versioning conflict was solved - We need the platform/application manifest decoupling to finish this work - Conversations with the Build team are indicating that we will have a temporary Antelope branch for our builds and development - Storyboard/Tasks for decoupling platform and application manifests: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010797 - Infra team is prioritizing the CENGN decommission and will act on it after that -- Best Regards, Thales Elero Cervi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Wed Aug 2 17:17:27 2023 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 17:17:27 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Test Status Call - Aug 1, 2023 Message-ID: Hi everyone, Please find below the minutes from this week's StarlingX Test Status Call: Minutes for 08/01/2023 * Open Topics: ? Plan to discuss the feature list for STX9.0 in the release call this week. * There was an action captured in the release call for feature primes to update dates and determine what content looks to be coming for STX9.0 * Sanity Status: * Sanity on STX 9.0 - Green ? Last execution, July 31, 2023 - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014356.html o Sanity on STX 9.0 plus Openstack - Red ? Two issues opened to track failing tests * #2029378 - STX | Debian: kubernetes certificates renewal failure on controller-1 * #2029376 - External application resources not accessible due to firewall changes ? Last execution, Aug 1, 2023 - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014357.html * Feature Test Status: * Feature testing is tracked in the following google sheet: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1El3g0ute5K2S5DTR9p_rxa1jQlq8gcUzgMCNCE_sx8g/edit#gid=968103774 ? Some features are in progress, sheet does need updating ACTION: Rob/Nimalini * Regression Testing will be tracked here closer to release end: * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NjYk9N0whK91nHViB5HFG2C1-XdJ09StVuLMxsz0KAY/edit?pli=1#gid=1717644237 Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 01:13:02 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 01:13:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure In-Reply-To: <5B2F3840-4294-42A5-8E26-413DFF23DEA4@openinfra.dev> References: <5B2F3840-4294-42A5-8E26-413DFF23DEA4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:21 AM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out with updates about using Matrix as a community chat tool onwards. With support from the StarlingX TSC and contributors, and no objections raised, the community decided to move over to Matrix from IRC! Next steps: - Once the community agrees on a room structure, I will go ahead to create that on the Matrix instance that the OpenDev community is maintaining - As the #starlingX IRC channel is available through a bridge on Matrix, the channel will still be available to provide a grace period - I will update the references to the chat platform on the website and other community resources Proposed room structure: - General discussions: starlingx-general - Project team channels: * starlingx-build * starlingx-containers * starlingx-distcloud * starlingx-distro * starlingx-docs * starlingx-flock * starlingx-networking * starlingx-openstack * starlingx-release * starlingx-security * starlingx-test Does the above room setup work for the community? __Please share your questions and concerns by end of day on next Tuesday (August 1).__ Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 03:00:18 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 03:00:18 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Hi Jeremy, I don't think this is working. I have included a couple of examples below, but there are many based on the recent code merges in the StarlingX repo. - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/+/889994 merged Aug 2 - Corresponding LP is not automatically updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2028975 - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/889875 merged Aug 1 - Corresponding LP is not automatically updated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2028173 Regards, Ghada -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Stanley Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 7:53 AM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 2023-07-24 19:20:40 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > we need to schedule some brief downtime to restart the service on the > new image. [...] We restarted Gerrit yesterday for a version upgrade, which also resulted in the fix for the bug updating hook script taking effect. Any changes merged after 2023-07-26 21:05 UTC should close corresponding bugtasks in Launchpad as expected. Changes which merged prior to that, since about 2023-05-12 when the service was originally restarted onto the broken hook script change, may need their bugtasks manually set to fix committed or fix released. -- Jeremy Stanley From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 03:36:24 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 03:36:24 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Aug 2/2023 Message-ID: Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases stx.9.0 - Release/Feature Planning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing - Upcoming Release Milestones - Milestone-3: Aug 23 - Feature Status - A number of feature milestones are now overdue and not updated in the planning spreadsheet - Overdue milestones are highlighted in yellow in the spreadsheet - Action: Each feature prime to evaluate whether their feature still fits in the stx.9.0 time-frame and update the spreadsheet accordingly Blogs - Platform Single Core Tuning - Prime: Guilherme Batista Leite - Forecast: May 9 >> Jun 6 - Status: Published - Pull Request: https://github.com/StarlingXWeb/starlingx-website/pull/238 - FEC Device Configurability (fec-operator Integration) for ACC100 & N3000 - Prime: Balendu (Mouli) Burla - Forecast: May 1 >> May 19 >> Aug 15 - Status: Confirmed / Not posted - PTP O-RAN Compliant API Notification - Prime: Ghada Khalil - Forecast: Jun 30 >> Oct 15 - Status: Confirmed / Not posted From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 03:56:54 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 03:56:54 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Aug 2, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call Aug 2, 2023 Asia-friendly Timezone: Meeting is at 7pm PDT / 10pm EDT / +1 10am CST Standing topics - Build - Main Branch Debian Builds - Builds are failing due to dockerhub limits. Last successful build is July 31. - Davlet has merged a change to use a separate build account for the nightly builds - build with that fix is ongoing now. - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/ - stx.6.0 Weekly RC Builds - Still working thru issues related to CentOS builds after transitioning off CENGN. Issues are related to https access to WR infrastructure. - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/ - stx.7.0 Weekly RC Builds - Still working thru issues related to CentOS builds after transitioning off CENGN. Issues are related to https access to WR infrastructure. - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.7.0 - stx.8.0 Weekly RC Builds - Built successfully last weekend - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/8.0/ - Transition from CENGN - Status: Complete. - StarlingX is no longer using CENGN infrastructure for builds. The equipment has been powered off. - Builds are running on WR infrastructure with aliases setup for the CENGN URLs. - The final piece is to eventually change aliased references from CENGN to WR. - Sanity - Debian Main Branch Platform Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 1: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014356.html - Status: Green for SX and DX - Debian Main Branch stx-openstack Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 1: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014357.html - Status: RED - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029376 - Fix merged on Aug 2 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029378 - Still open / need to be reviewed by the security team - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - No Gerrit reviews needing discussion this week. - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - StarlingX community is in the process of switching to matrix for community collaboration - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014340.html - Launchpad status on automatically being updated - Email sent from Jeremy Stanley indicating that this has been addressed as of July 26: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014341.html - However, it doesn't seem to be working. Email response sent: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014361.html ARs from Previous Meetings - dockerhub is cracking down on download limits - Davlet introduced an option to workaround this issue by having individual users login instead of using the same corporate IP - Action: Davlet to share this info on the mailing list and also open a stx.docs launchpad to add this info permanently to the project docs - Status: Open - Email sent by Davlet, but no launchpad was opened - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014337.html - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014338.html - Another suggestion is to look at an alternative to dockerhub - Examples: quay.io / nexsus-repo community edition / harbour - https://quay.io - From Ildiko: some open-infra projects moved to quay due to the dockerhub limits. Perhaps we can get some input from them. - https://www.sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository - This would have to be handled as a feature propsal / spec given the large scope - Work would be required by the Build team - Note: StarlingX uses open-source images as well which are hosted in dockerhub - Manifest repo re-configuration / split to allow stx-openstack to be built independently from the platform - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014206.html - No concerns from the community regarding this proposal. - The key issue is scheduling time for the build team to implement the change. - Action: Build team to propose a timeline based on their priorities/availability. - Status: Open - No update. Build team is focused on CENGN transition - StoryBoard tracking the work: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010797 - Renaming App Repos to remove the "armada" - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014215.html - Minor / cosmetic change. Lower priority, but would be nice to do. Should have no impact on runtime. - Action: Build team to propose a timeline based on their priorities/availability. (lower priority than the manifest repo re-config) - Status: Open - No update. Build team is focused on CENGN transition - Will likely only be planned after splitting manifests for openstack Open Requests for Help - Help w/ Install - Two people asking for help with installation on IRC - Bruno is trying to help them, but it appears that they are in a different timezone. If others can participate, it would be great. - Status: Open - Discussion is continuing between Bruno and others on IRC - The questions are a mix of how to setup a virtual env as well the installation itself - For virtual env, there are two options currently: vbox & libvirt/kvm - Note: There is recent effort to get libvirt/kvm working. Email reference: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014267.html From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 11:07:45 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 11:07:45 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure In-Reply-To: References: <5B2F3840-4294-42A5-8E26-413DFF23DEA4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Ildiko, Are there instructions on how to setup Matrix account and join starlingx room ? Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Waines, Greg Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2023 9:13 PM To: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure +1 -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:21 AM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out with updates about using Matrix as a community chat tool onwards. With support from the StarlingX TSC and contributors, and no objections raised, the community decided to move over to Matrix from IRC! Next steps: - Once the community agrees on a room structure, I will go ahead to create that on the Matrix instance that the OpenDev community is maintaining - As the #starlingX IRC channel is available through a bridge on Matrix, the channel will still be available to provide a grace period - I will update the references to the chat platform on the website and other community resources Proposed room structure: - General discussions: starlingx-general - Project team channels: * starlingx-build * starlingx-containers * starlingx-distcloud * starlingx-distro * starlingx-docs * starlingx-flock * starlingx-networking * starlingx-openstack * starlingx-release * starlingx-security * starlingx-test Does the above room setup work for the community? __Please share your questions and concerns by end of day on next Tuesday (August 1).__ Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From fungi at yuggoth.org Thu Aug 3 13:28:33 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 13:28:33 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure In-Reply-To: References: <5B2F3840-4294-42A5-8E26-413DFF23DEA4@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <20230803132832.3yolg7mhvdo3xhur@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-03 11:07:45 +0000 (+0000), Waines, Greg wrote: > Are there instructions on how to setup Matrix account and join > starlingx room ? [...] I don't think any of the StarlingX contributors have written that documentation yet (at least not that I've seen). Previously I linked to the documentation the Zuul contributors wrote letting their newcomers know how to get on Matrix, but here it is again: https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/howtos/matrix.html That and the follow-up documents linked at the end of it are distributed under a free license (it's either Apache 2 or CC BY 3.0, I just realized we don't clarify so I'll get that fixed). You can find the reStructuredText source for them here if you want to fork them to create some specific to StarlingX: https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul/src/branch/master/doc/source/howtos That said, it's pretty easy to muddle through without documentation. Most places the Zuul materials simply link to the channel directly like this: https://matrix.to/#/#zuul:opendev.org Following that link, users get options to view the channel anonymously, log in or create a new account to be able to start talking, and links to other clients if they don't want to do it in-browser. Note that Matrix is itself a public network built entirely on open source software, so has its own developer community who publishes extensive documentation if you want to dig into details: https://matrix.org/ Hope that helps! -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Thu Aug 3 14:06:44 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:06:44 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-03 03:00:18 +0000 (+0000), Khalil, Ghada wrote: > I don't think this is working. I have included a couple of > examples below, but there are many based on the recent code merges > in the StarlingX repo. [...] Thanks for the heads up! I instrumented some additional debug logging in the hook scripts responsible for Gerrit-to-Launchpad integration and discovered that, in addition to the earlier issue, we also were apparently broken by an incident[*] with the Launchpad API dating back to June 23. After performing[**] the cache cleanup they recommended, I'm no longer seeing tracebacks from the scripts, so expect they should finally be working as of a few minutes ago. Please double-check any changes you merge in the near future, just to be extra sure. [*] https://ubuntu.social/@launchpadstatus/110594525393361192 [**] https://fosstodon.org/@opendevinfra/110826029948394419 -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Aug 3 15:46:54 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 17:46:54 +0200 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Matrix next steps and room structure In-Reply-To: <20230803132832.3yolg7mhvdo3xhur@yuggoth.org> References: <5B2F3840-4294-42A5-8E26-413DFF23DEA4@openinfra.dev> <20230803132832.3yolg7mhvdo3xhur@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Hi, Thanks Jeremy for sharing! I also shared some information about Matrix in a previous email, such as client options and the link to join the current #starlingx channel on the OFTC IRC network here: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014283.html Jeremy and I are working on creating the space and room structure on OpenDev?s Matrix server for StarlingX. Once that is live, I will work with the community to have documentation available about how to join, and pointers to further resources. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 3, 2023, at 15:28, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > On 2023-08-03 11:07:45 +0000 (+0000), Waines, Greg wrote: >> Are there instructions on how to setup Matrix account and join >> starlingx room ? > [...] > > I don't think any of the StarlingX contributors have written that > documentation yet (at least not that I've seen). Previously I linked > to the documentation the Zuul contributors wrote letting their > newcomers know how to get on Matrix, but here it is again: > > https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/howtos/matrix.html > > That and the follow-up documents linked at the end of it are > distributed under a free license (it's either Apache 2 or CC BY 3.0, > I just realized we don't clarify so I'll get that fixed). You can > find the reStructuredText source for them here if you want to fork > them to create some specific to StarlingX: > > https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul/src/branch/master/doc/source/howtos > > That said, it's pretty easy to muddle through without documentation. > Most places the Zuul materials simply link to the channel directly > like this: > > https://matrix.to/#/#zuul:opendev.org > > Following that link, users get options to view the channel > anonymously, log in or create a new account to be able to start > talking, and links to other clients if they don't want to do it > in-browser. Note that Matrix is itself a public network built > entirely on open source software, so has its own developer community > who publishes extensive documentation if you want to dig into > details: > > https://matrix.org/ > > Hope that helps! > -- > Jeremy Stanley > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 16:41:17 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 16:41:17 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I'm responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Thu Aug 3 18:14:41 2023 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <0541f71c-3189-823f-9aa0-af132784480f@eng.windriver.com> I think there is still an issue The merger of https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890427 failed to update https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029499 Scott On 2023-08-03 10:06, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > On 2023-08-03 03:00:18 +0000 (+0000), Khalil, Ghada wrote: >> I don't think this is working. I have included a couple of >> examples below, but there are many based on the recent code merges >> in the StarlingX repo. > [...] > > Thanks for the heads up! I instrumented some additional debug > logging in the hook scripts responsible for Gerrit-to-Launchpad > integration and discovered that, in addition to the earlier issue, > we also were apparently broken by an incident[*] with the Launchpad > API dating back to June 23. After performing[**] the cache cleanup > they recommended, I'm no longer seeing tracebacks from the scripts, > so expect they should finally be working as of a few minutes ago. > Please double-check any changes you merge in the near future, just > to be extra sure. > > [*] https://ubuntu.social/@launchpadstatus/110594525393361192 > [**] https://fosstodon.org/@opendevinfra/110826029948394419 > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 17:55:55 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 13:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Will do Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: > > To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott > to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as > core reviews on the new repo: > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator > > Regards, > > Ghada > > *From:* Lal, RafalX > *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM > *To:* Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor > ; Reed, Joshua > *Cc:* Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven > ; Walsh, Richard > ; Clarke, Kevin > *Subject:* Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code > > *CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!* > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender > and know the content is safe. > > Hello, > > I?m responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into > StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing > application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven > will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into > the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to > do that. This is the mentioned change > . > I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free > time. > > Best Regards > > Rafal > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 18:10:55 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <612574a9-3de8-3a4e-cf99-a59b77714a0d@windriver.com> I think there is still an issue The merger of https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890427 failed to update https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029499 Scott On 2023-08-03 10:06, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > On 2023-08-03 03:00:18 +0000 (+0000), Khalil, Ghada wrote: >> I don't think this is working. I have included a couple of >> examples below, but there are many based on the recent code merges >> in the StarlingX repo. > [...] > > Thanks for the heads up! I instrumented some additional debug > logging in the hook scripts responsible for Gerrit-to-Launchpad > integration and discovered that, in addition to the earlier issue, > we also were apparently broken by an incident[*] with the Launchpad > API dating back to June 23. After performing[**] the cache cleanup > they recommended, I'm no longer seeing tracebacks from the scripts, > so expect they should finally be working as of a few minutes ago. > Please double-check any changes you merge in the near future, just > to be extra sure. > > [*] https://ubuntu.social/@launchpadstatus/110594525393361192 > [**] https://fosstodon.org/@opendevinfra/110826029948394419 > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 18:14:13 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: I think there is still an issue The merger of https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890427 failed to update https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029499 Scott On 2023-08-03 10:06, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > On 2023-08-03 03:00:18 +0000 (+0000), Khalil, Ghada wrote: >> I don't think this is working. I have included a couple of >> examples below, but there are many based on the recent code merges >> in the StarlingX repo. > [...] > > Thanks for the heads up! I instrumented some additional debug > logging in the hook scripts responsible for Gerrit-to-Launchpad > integration and discovered that, in addition to the earlier issue, > we also were apparently broken by an incident[*] with the Launchpad > API dating back to June 23. After performing[**] the cache cleanup > they recommended, I'm no longer seeing tracebacks from the scripts, > so expect they should finally be working as of a few minutes ago. > Please double-check any changes you merge in the near future, just > to be extra sure. > > [*] https://ubuntu.social/@launchpadstatus/110594525393361192 > [**] https://fosstodon.org/@opendevinfra/110826029948394419 > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 3 18:19:25 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 14:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: > > To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott > to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as > core reviews on the new repo: > https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator > > Regards, > > Ghada > > *From:* Lal, RafalX > *Sent:* Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM > *To:* Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor > ; Reed, Joshua > *Cc:* Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven > ; Walsh, Richard > ; Clarke, Kevin > *Subject:* Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code > > *CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!* > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender > and know the content is safe. > > Hello, > > I?m responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into > StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing > application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven > will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into > the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to > do that. This is the mentioned change > . > I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free > time. > > Best Regards > > Rafal > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Thu Aug 3 19:47:39 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 19:47:39 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Launchpad status not updating automatically In-Reply-To: <0541f71c-3189-823f-9aa0-af132784480f@eng.windriver.com> References: <20230724192039.sui4ss5qxtl6zpof@yuggoth.org> <20230727115319.2baxubtximmalx64@yuggoth.org> <20230803140644.hrm66bvudapngwoe@yuggoth.org> <0541f71c-3189-823f-9aa0-af132784480f@eng.windriver.com> Message-ID: <20230803194738.zvrdxmcp7hmer2vg@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-03 14:14:41 -0400 (-0400), Scott.Little wrote: > I think there is still an issue > > The merger of https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890427 > > failed to update https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029499 [...] It looks like the hook scripts are once again commenting on the indicated bug report when the change is proposed or merged. It doesn't appear to have updated the bugtask's status from new to in-progress or fix-released, but I see other bugs[*] where it did successfully change a bugtask status. Looking at the examples and the source code[**] for the script, I think what you're going to find is that if the branch name for the change doesn't contain a "/" then the hook assumes the default project bugtask is what should have its status updated. If it finds a "/" in the branch name then it looks for a specific bugtask for a series ending in a substring that matches whatever comes after that. So in the case of change 890427 for the r/stx.7.0 branch of the starlingx/tools project it's going to check the linked bug 2029499 to see if it has a bugtask for a series whose name ends in "stx.7.0" and then update its status to in-progress or fix-released as appropriate. If 890427 had been for the "master" branch of starlingx/tools, then I think it would have adjusted the status of the default bugtask on 2029499. If we need to carve out some exceptions or additional per-project configurable behaviors (within reason), I'm sure it can be accommodated, just let me know. [*] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029425 [**] https://opendev.org/opendev/jeepyb/src/commit/8fd3fda/jeepyb/cmd/update_bug.py#L178-L199 -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com Fri Aug 4 13:53:02 2023 From: Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com (Pires Soares, Igor) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 13:53:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada ; Lal, RafalX ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I?m responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com Fri Aug 4 15:27:50 2023 From: Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com (Pires Soares, Igor) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:27:50 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. The core group looks empty to me: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/b654c6ae66bdface82b16ac7e4f322f311dcc71e,members Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Pires Soares, Igor Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 10:53 AM To: Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Lal, RafalX ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada ; Lal, RafalX ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I?m responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Fri Aug 4 18:03:36 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 18:03:36 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230804180336.elpcfd7admxskgxa@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-04 15:27:50 +0000 (+0000), Pires Soares, Igor wrote: > It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. [...] It looks like a typographical error in the group name was missed in review. The (empty) starlingx-intel-ethernet-operator-core group has code review/approval permissions, while a separate starlingx-app-intel-ethernet-operator-core group (which Scott asked me to add him to) has permission to abandon changes for that repository. I've pushed up a change to switch the review/approval permissions to the starlingx-app-intel-ethernet-operator-core group, if someone can confirm that was the actual intent: https://review.opendev.org/890569 -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Fri Aug 4 21:05:40 2023 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 21:05:40 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 04-08-2023 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's doc team meeting minutes. Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Fridays 6:00 a.m. PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 04-August-23 Status: We had 10 participants at today's meeting. We encourage the community to join our Doc meetings on Fridays. - Stx 9.0 Release Tracking Spreadsheet: Doc Stories are tracked in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing. - To add stories that are planned for Stx 9.0 - AR Juanita - WIP - Update the "Install StarlingX Kuberbetes in a virtual environment" docs; https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/deploy_install_guides/release/index-install-r7-8966076f0e81.html - Discussion about Merging the Installation Guides ; Virtual env with the Bare metal docs. WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/876107 - Split the docs and retain them as separate guides at a high level. Resue content from Bare Metal in the Virtual env docs. - Opensource Project versions - Add Opensource Project versions in the Stx 9.0 RN - AR Juanita - Create a story to track and update - DONE - https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010866 Gerrit reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 3 Reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 7 outstanding bugs- Closed 3- The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP. Teams to add all the impacted Releases when raising a LP bug Miscellaneous Updates: - Manju asked how much HW is required including add-ons, nvidia etc. for a small organization - Ron directed Manju to the Stx discuss group - Manju to raise questions in the Stx discuss group or at the Community Meeting held on Wednesdays each week. - AR Manju - We have a fault that is preventing LPs from closing when the corresponding Gerrit WFs. Ron spoke with Jeremy Stanley, who reproduced the bug and is investigating. - Ghada sent out an email to the Stx discuss group; https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014361.html - Pending - Ron to update the Verified H/W page with the automated script updates https://www.windriver.com/studio/operator/self-validated-and-certified-hosts# - Currently Commented out - Script needs to be updated- Waiting for updates to the script -AR Ron - WIP - Bruno Muniz showed interest in creating DOC Videos supporting the StarlingX Installation Process. To check with Ildiko / Greg whether this is ok. These Videos can be hosted in a location in StarlingX. The Installation Docs can point to these videos - AR Bruno to get approvals from Ildiko / Greg - Future Update - Sphinx Tools - Need to have further discussions about the version used upstream vs. downstream - AR Ron -To determine version. - Docker Container upstream / downstream - AR Ron (Discuss it with Greg / Ildiko) - a long term project - Pending - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Engineering Status: StarlingX Eng Stx Status: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status StarlingX Eng Status 2023 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores ____________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Sat Aug 5 11:08:17 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2023 11:08:17 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] TSC portion of TSC+Community meeting cancelled for Aug.9 & Aug.16 Message-ID: All, I will be out-of-office the next couple of weeks, so the TSC portion of the "TSC+Community" meeting will be cancelled for Aug.9 & Aug.16 . The COMMUNITY portion of the meeting will still be held. Greg. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kennelson11 at gmail.com Mon Aug 7 17:00:02 2023 From: kennelson11 at gmail.com (Kendall Nelson) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 12:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Fwd: vPTG October 2023 Team Signup Deadline Approaching! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Everyone, Sign up your team up for the next virtual Project Teams Gathering (PTG), which will be held from Monday, October 23 to Friday, October 27 2023! If you haven't already done so and your team is interested in participating, you need to complete the survey[1] by August 20, 2023 at 7:00 UTC. Then make sure to register[2] - it?s free :) Thanks! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] Team Survey: https://openinfrafoundation.formstack.com/forms/oct2023_ptg_team_signup [2] PTG Registration: http://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rafalx.lal at intel.com Mon Aug 7 18:00:55 2023 From: rafalx.lal at intel.com (Lal, RafalX) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:00:55 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It looks empty to me also. Regards, Rafal From: Pires Soares, Igor Sent: 04 August 2023 17:28 To: Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Lal, RafalX ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. The core group looks empty to me: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/b654c6ae66bdface82b16ac7e4f322f311dcc71e,members Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 10:53 AM To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Pires Soares, Igor >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I'm responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Mon Aug 7 19:22:36 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 19:22:36 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230807192235.24yhxws5xoh46yef@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-07 18:00:55 +0000 (+0000), Lal, RafalX wrote: > It looks empty to me also. [...] Please see my earlier reply about this topic. The presumed fix has been waiting since Friday for someone from the StarlingX community to double-check the suspected typographical error in the ACL for that project. If you can confirm the group name was supposed to be starlingx-app-intel-ethernet-operator-core instead of starlingx-intel-ethernet-operator-core then please +1 https://review.opendev.org/890569 and I'll merge it straight away. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Robert.Church at windriver.com Mon Aug 7 22:47:11 2023 From: Robert.Church at windriver.com (Church, Robert) Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 22:47:11 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: <20230807192235.24yhxws5xoh46yef@yuggoth.org> References: <20230807192235.24yhxws5xoh46yef@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: Thanks Jeremy, LGTM. +1. Regards, Bob From: Jeremy Stanley Date: Monday, August 7, 2023 at 2:28 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. On 2023-08-07 18:00:55 +0000 (+0000), Lal, RafalX wrote: > It looks empty to me also. [...] Please see my earlier reply about this topic. The presumed fix has been waiting since Friday for someone from the StarlingX community to double-check the suspected typographical error in the ACL for that project. If you can confirm the group name was supposed to be starlingx-app-intel-ethernet-operator-core instead of starlingx-intel-ethernet-operator-core then please +1 https://review.opendev.org/890569 and I'll merge it straight away. -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Tue Aug 8 00:35:40 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 00:35:40 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: <20230807192235.24yhxws5xoh46yef@yuggoth.org> Message-ID: <20230808003539.pstofr5q2d2gkfxh@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-07 22:47:11 +0000 (+0000), Church, Robert wrote: > Thanks Jeremy, LGTM. +1. [...] And thanks for the extra set of eyeballs on it. Merged and deployed as of about 45 minutes ago, so people should check again whether they can approve changes for that project now (you may need to force refresh your browser tab if you already have Gerrit open in it). -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From richard.walsh at intel.com Tue Aug 8 10:09:20 2023 From: richard.walsh at intel.com (Walsh, Richard) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 10:09:20 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: @Pires Soares, Igor @Reed, Joshua - is there anything we need to/can help do from the Intel side here ? I see this (with the turn-based set to Joshua I think) [cid:image001.png at 01D9C9E8.C5421BE0] From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 7:01 PM To: Pires Soares, Igor ; Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It looks empty to me also. Regards, Rafal From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: 04 August 2023 17:28 To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. The core group looks empty to me: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/b654c6ae66bdface82b16ac7e4f322f311dcc71e,members Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 10:53 AM To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Pires Soares, Igor >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I'm responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 97196 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com Tue Aug 8 14:09:16 2023 From: Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com (Subramanian, Ramaswamy) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:09:16 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DistCloud/Flock Services Project Meeting Minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: August 8, 2023: * StarlingX 9.0 Release: * Feature development in progress. More details available in the release planning spread sheet. * Stale Code Review Cleanup to keep the review queue sane (more than 1 year old with no activity) * https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/821774 * https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/773296 * Bug cleanup (more than 1 year old with no activity) * Closed. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1838524 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1854367 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1863377 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1875426 * Candidate for Closure. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1883201 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1912421 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com Tue Aug 8 18:24:50 2023 From: Igor.PiresSoares at windriver.com (Pires Soares, Igor) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 18:24:50 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It looks good on the Gerrit side now. I was able to proceed with the review there. Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Walsh, Richard Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:09 AM To: Lal, RafalX ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io ; Kenny, Emma ; Juele, John Rey ; Halim, Abdul Subject: RE: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. @Pires Soares, Igor @Reed, Joshua ? is there anything we need to/can help do from the Intel side here ? I see this (with the turn-based set to Joshua I think) [cid:image001.png at 01D9C9E8.C5421BE0] From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 7:01 PM To: Pires Soares, Igor ; Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It looks empty to me also. Regards, Rafal From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: 04 August 2023 17:28 To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. The core group looks empty to me: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/b654c6ae66bdface82b16ac7e4f322f311dcc71e,members Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 10:53 AM To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Pires Soares, Igor >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I?m responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 97196 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From Joshua.Reed at windriver.com Tue Aug 8 18:49:55 2023 From: Joshua.Reed at windriver.com (Reed, Joshua) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 18:49:55 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Likewise - I was able to take a pass at this review today. Thanks! -Joshua Reed From: Pires Soares, Igor Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 12:25 PM To: Walsh, Richard ; Lal, RafalX ; Little, Scott ; Khalil, Ghada ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Webster, Steven ; Clarke, Kevin ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Kenny, Emma ; Juele, John Rey ; Halim, Abdul Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It looks good on the Gerrit side now. I was able to proceed with the review there. Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Walsh, Richard > Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:09 AM To: Lal, RafalX >; Pires Soares, Igor >; Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >; Kenny, Emma >; Juele, John Rey >; Halim, Abdul > Subject: RE: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. @Pires Soares, Igor @Reed, Joshua - is there anything we need to/can help do from the Intel side here ? I see this (with the turn-based set to Joshua I think) [cid:image001.png at 01D9C9F6.D29FB500] From: Lal, RafalX > Sent: Monday, August 7, 2023 7:01 PM To: Pires Soares, Igor >; Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It looks empty to me also. Regards, Rafal From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: 04 August 2023 17:28 To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code It seems that I cannot +2 on the intel-ethernet-operator repo. The core group looks empty to me: https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/b654c6ae66bdface82b16ac7e4f322f311dcc71e,members Regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Pires Soares, Igor > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2023 10:53 AM To: Little, Scott >; Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code Thanks, Ghada and Scott. I'll be reviewing it shortly. RafalX, in the meantime, feel free to get in touch in case you have any questions about the application framework standards. Best regards, Igor ________________________________ From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 3:19 PM To: Khalil, Ghada >; Lal, RafalX >; Pires Soares, Igor >; Reed, Joshua > Cc: Webster, Steven >; Walsh, Richard >; Clarke, Kevin >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code I've added the core reviewers per your request. Scott On 2023-08-03 12:41, Khalil, Ghada wrote: To clarify, we need at @Little, Scott to add Steve, Johusa, and Igor as core reviews on the new repo: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:starlingx%252Fapp-intel-ethernet-operator Regards, Ghada From: Lal, RafalX Sent: Thursday, August 3, 2023 11:18 AM To: Little, Scott ; Pires Soares, Igor ; Reed, Joshua Cc: Khalil, Ghada ; Webster, Steven ; Walsh, Richard ; Clarke, Kevin Subject: Review of app-intel-ethernet-operator code CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello, I'm responsible for integration of Intel Ethernet Operator into StarlingX 9.0, and we are currently at the stage of pushing application code to opendev/starlingx repository. Review from Steven will be there, but core reviewers are needed to merge this change into the repository. I got suggestion from Ghada that you might be able to do that. This is the mentioned change. I would greatly appreciate if you would have a look at it in your free time. Best Regards Rafal -------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Research and Development Ireland Limited Registered in Ireland Registered Office: Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare Registered Number: 308263 This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 97196 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From kennelson11 at gmail.com Tue Aug 8 19:07:11 2023 From: kennelson11 at gmail.com (Kendall Nelson) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 14:07:11 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Fwd: Call for Mentors & Projects - Boston University Students In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Everyone! As some of you might know, we have had a working relationship with Boston University once a year where students actively participate in our OpenInfra project communities. The semester in which the Fundamentals of Cloud Computing (the course where we collaborate with them)( is approaching. September 5 is when the course begins and it runs until December 21. The course is a senior/graduate-level class that includes a semester-long capstone-like project, with the projects being proposed and supervised by an industry mentor. The projects are completed in teams of 5-7 students, who are expected to spend 5-8 hours per week on the project over the 13-week term, with presentations to the class every two weeks to evaluate their progress. *So! If you know of a project you would like to propose, please let me know ASAP! The professor would like to have the finalized list of projects to offer students by the first week in September. * Let me know if you have any other questions! -Kendall Nelson -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 8 22:06:28 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:06:28 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions Message-ID: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to share some information with you from a call I had with a potential new user. * Industry area, use cases and requirements - The company is in the telecom industry, the person I talked to has been in the area of research - StarlingX use cases + Primarily private wireless and 5G core + Later on potential use cases might include AI, healthcare and more - They are currently prioritizing containerized workloads and later on will be looking into deploying OpenStack as well * Evaluation status - Early stages, they deployed StarlingX, both simplex and duplex, in virtual environments - Looking into bare metal deployment as well * Feedback and questions so far - As they have been looking into the platform, they didn?t seem to be able to find the level of multi-tenancy that they needed + Does the platform support multiple tenants within one Kubernetes cluster and one StarlingX instance? Is there any documentation that describes the available tenant and user configurations within StarlingX? - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. - They had an intern who was working on deploying the platform and has been using the community?s communication channels, including IRC. The intern had a hard time getting responses to their questions, which made it harder to figure out how to overcome the deployment challenges. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 8 22:15:25 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:15:25 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions Message-ID: Hi StarlingX Community, I got the below questions about StarlingX, and need a little help with finding the answers: 1. Can a subcloud-group be rehomed (can see that a subcloud can, but what about a subcloud-group)? 2. Can a subcloud belong to multiple subcloud groups for administrative and monitoring/reporting purposes? - For example, having all subclouds in a given region with the same update/version policies, and at the same time having all instances running a particular application to have specific settings for that application regardless of region setting? 3. Is it possible to provision a specific application to an entire subcloud-group in a single action? 4. Last one - is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. Thank you for your help in advance. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From Bruno.Muniz at encora.com Tue Aug 8 22:49:34 2023 From: Bruno.Muniz at encora.com (Bruno Drugowick Muniz) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 22:49:34 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions In-Reply-To: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> References: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hi, Ildik? and StarlingX Community. I'll add my 2 cents regarding their feedback. > - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. > + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? Regarding the above, the Docs team recently discussed a problem with the Virtual guides being outdated when compared to the bare metal guides. If someone was following the Virtual guides, it could partially account for their confusion. This problem is being tracked as a bug and it's actively being discussed in the Docs team meetings. While I don't represent the Docs team, I participated in the discussion, and I'm assigned to this bug while awaiting the resolution of other blocking factors. The bug in question can be found here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2028272. Therefore, even though there might be additional problems not covered by this bug, addressing the concern with the Virtual guides is indeed part of the community's plan. Regarding the query below: > + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. I'm not sure I fully understand what exactly they meant by "automate the creation of networks for the platform". Could we gather more specific details on this? Regards, -- Bruno. ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 19:06 To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to share some information with you from a call I had with a potential new user. * Industry area, use cases and requirements - The company is in the telecom industry, the person I talked to has been in the area of research - StarlingX use cases + Primarily private wireless and 5G core + Later on potential use cases might include AI, healthcare and more - They are currently prioritizing containerized workloads and later on will be looking into deploying OpenStack as well * Evaluation status - Early stages, they deployed StarlingX, both simplex and duplex, in virtual environments - Looking into bare metal deployment as well * Feedback and questions so far - As they have been looking into the platform, they didn?t seem to be able to find the level of multi-tenancy that they needed + Does the platform support multiple tenants within one Kubernetes cluster and one StarlingX instance? Is there any documentation that describes the available tenant and user configurations within StarlingX? - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. - They had an intern who was working on deploying the platform and has been using the community?s communication channels, including IRC. The intern had a hard time getting responses to their questions, which made it harder to figure out how to overcome the deployment challenges. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 8 22:56:48 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2023 15:56:48 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions In-Reply-To: References: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hi Bruno, Thank you for the quick comments. A few notes in line. > [?] > > Hi, Ildik? and StarlingX Community. > > I'll add my 2 cents regarding their feedback. > > > - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. > > + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? > > Regarding the above, the Docs team recently discussed a problem with the Virtual guides being outdated when compared to the bare metal guides. If someone was following the Virtual guides, it could partially account for their confusion. This problem is being tracked as a bug and it's actively being discussed in the Docs team meetings. While I don't represent the Docs team, I participated in the discussion, and I'm assigned to this bug while awaiting the resolution of other blocking factors. The bug in question can be found here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2028272. > > Therefore, even though there might be additional problems not covered by this bug, addressing the concern with the Virtual guides is indeed part of the community's plan. [Ildiko] That is great to hear, thank you for the updates! > > Regarding the query below: > > > + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. > > I'm not sure I fully understand what exactly they meant by "automate the creation of networks for the platform". Could we gather more specific details on this? > > [?] [Ildiko] While we did not go into deep details on this during our conversation. The person said that the L2 network setup is fine, but the L3 is a bit lacking in terms of setting up NAT, bridges, etc. I?m not sure if the comments were maybe specific to the duplex system or just in general applicable to either virtual deployment options. Does this help? Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Wed Aug 9 00:55:38 2023 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 00:55:38 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20230808T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2023 August 8 (https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230808T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] DX sanity Passed: 19 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 19 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_swact_controller_platform PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_standby PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-True] PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-False] PASS test_force_reboot_host[standby_controller-False] PASS test_bmc_verify_bm_type_ipmi PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Wed Aug 9 12:14:29 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:14:29 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ildiko, I might be able to help with the last question: > 4. Is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. I am pretty sure this is not being tested recently, so we should definitely revisit it and re-test if the community finds it important. What I know from the past is that the stx-openstack application SHOULD BE supported on subclouds and SHOULD NOT BE supported on central (system controller) clouds. If we feel like revisiting this deployment, we can arrange it as part of stx.10 maybe? Hoping it helps you :) Thales ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 7:15 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I got the below questions about StarlingX, and need a little help with finding the answers: 1. Can a subcloud-group be rehomed (can see that a subcloud can, but what about a subcloud-group)? 2. Can a subcloud belong to multiple subcloud groups for administrative and monitoring/reporting purposes? - For example, having all subclouds in a given region with the same update/version policies, and at the same time having all instances running a particular application to have specific settings for that application regardless of region setting? 3. Is it possible to provision a specific application to an entire subcloud-group in a single action? 4. Last one - is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. Thank you for your help in advance. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jackie.Huang at windriver.com Wed Aug 9 14:28:16 2023 From: Jackie.Huang at windriver.com (Huang, Jie (Jackie)) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 14:28:16 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Little, Scott ; Scott Kamp Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support ? Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines ? Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions ? Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN ? Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruno.Muniz at encora.com Wed Aug 9 15:24:18 2023 From: Bruno.Muniz at encora.com (Bruno Drugowick Muniz) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:24:18 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions In-Reply-To: References: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Hi again, folks. Based on our conversation at the Community call today, we split the feedback regarding the network problems into two different things: 1) Get a GPU passthrough for NVIDIA to work on a virtual setup with VirtualBox. I don't have anything that I can add here, but would love to hear from others ? 2) Correctly set up networking for VirtualBox setup. On this second topic, I want to provide some additional info. If you had at any point a working StarlingX setup with VirtualBox (either using the recently merged automated guide or manually installing with the canonical guides) and you're now having problems accessing services running in the VM(s) it could be this: https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/20337#comment:1. In order to figure this out, I check if there's anything listening, on my host, in a port that I know is set up with a port forward in VirtualBox's NatNetwork (8080, for example): netstat -tunlp | grep 8080 If I don't get anything back from that, I then try to restart the NatNetworks with (notice that NatNetwork is the name of the Nat Network that is assigned to one of the VM's network adapters): vboxmanage natnetwork stop --netname NatNetwork vboxmanage natnetwork start --netname NatNetwork If after that the "netstat" is still not showing anything listening on ports that are forwarded between the host and the VM(s), then I also try to recreate the Nat Network from scratch (that worked already at least twice for me): vboxmanage natnetwork remove --netname NatNetwork || true vboxmanage natnetwork add --netname NatNetwork --dhcp off --network 10.10.10.0/24 vboxmanage natnetwork modify --netname NatNetwork --port-forward-4 "SSH:tcp:[]:3122:[10.10.10.3]:22" vboxmanage natnetwork modify --netname NatNetwork --port-forward-4 "HTTP:tcp:[]:8080:[10.10.10.3]:8080" ... and so on. If this is the case with your setup, I'm sorry. I know how frustrating this is and that's why I'm trying to follow up with the VirtualBox community (both on https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/20337 and https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/19651). If not, please let us know and share more details here ?. Regards, -- Bruno. ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 19:56 To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Bruno, Thank you for the quick comments. A few notes in line. > [?] > > Hi, Ildik? and StarlingX Community. > > I'll add my 2 cents regarding their feedback. > > > - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. > > + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? > > Regarding the above, the Docs team recently discussed a problem with the Virtual guides being outdated when compared to the bare metal guides. If someone was following the Virtual guides, it could partially account for their confusion. This problem is being tracked as a bug and it's actively being discussed in the Docs team meetings. While I don't represent the Docs team, I participated in the discussion, and I'm assigned to this bug while awaiting the resolution of other blocking factors. The bug in question can be found here: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.launchpad.net%2Fstarlingx%2F%2Bbug%2F2028272&data=05%7C01%7CBruno.Muniz%40encora.com%7C9439c06058ad4fcfd01108db9862bfe9%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638271322132779517%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=a%2FbPhdkTmLoXT83DCMqAQpvrau4DkcpldQqswm9PmX4%3D&reserved=0. > > Therefore, even though there might be additional problems not covered by this bug, addressing the concern with the Virtual guides is indeed part of the community's plan. [Ildiko] That is great to hear, thank you for the updates! > > Regarding the query below: > > > + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. > > I'm not sure I fully understand what exactly they meant by "automate the creation of networks for the platform". Could we gather more specific details on this? > > [?] [Ildiko] While we did not go into deep details on this during our conversation. The person said that the L2 network setup is fine, but the L3 is a bit lacking in terms of setting up NAT, bridges, etc. I?m not sure if the comments were maybe specific to the duplex system or just in general applicable to either virtual deployment options. Does this help? Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Wed Aug 9 15:26:27 2023 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 15:26:27 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity and Regression - StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build [20230804T200138Z] results - Aug - 4 Message-ID: Hi all, StarlingX + STX-Openstack sanity and regression results: Overall Status: Yellow Build Info: Build date: Aug 4 - 20230804T200138Z ISO: https://mirror.starlingx.windriver.com/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230804T200138Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Helm Chart: https://mirror.starlingx.windriver.com/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230804T200138Z/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-1.stx.64-debian-stable-versioned.tgz AIO-DX Baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=OVS Sanity Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 13 (86.67%) Failed: 2 (13.33%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS??20230808 13:54:20?test_ssh_to_hosts PASS??20230808 13:55:39?test_lock_unlock_host PASS??20230808 14:11:43?test_openstack_services_healthy PASS??20230808 14:12:46?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS??20230808 14:14:43?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS??20230808 14:23:48?test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS??20230808 14:26:34?test_swact_controllers PASS??20230808 14:33:58?test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] FAIL?? 20230808 14:40:32?test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS??20230808 14:48:19?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS??20230808 14:56:54?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL?? 20230808 15:01:17?test_evacuate_vms PASS??20230808 15:46:16?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS??20230808 15:46:32?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS??20230808 15:46:38?test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- test_evacuate_vms failed due to #2030883 - STX Debian: DX VM evacuation failed after reboot active controller . test_migrate_vm failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration Regression Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 9 (75.0%) Failed: 3 (25.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20230808 15:52:32 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20230808 15:53:58 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20230808 15:54:59 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20230808 15:59:34 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] FAIL 20230808 16:20:03 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20230808 16:32:08 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20230808 16:35:00 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20230808 16:40:08 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20230808 16:47:16 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20230808 16:52:33 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20230808 16:58:03 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20230808 17:22:43 test_lock_with_vms ------------------------------------------------------ test_cpu_pol_vm_actions failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration , test_lock_with_vms and test_vm_with_config_drive failed due to :#2030889 - STX | DX Controller-1 is not in locked state Thanks, STX-Openstack Distro Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 9 17:07:15 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 10:07:15 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Upcoming virtual PTG in October - time slots Message-ID: <0025B599-4516-4AC4-AF09-4CFEC7ED4FCD@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, As you might?ve seen the next virtual Project Teams Gathering (PTG)[1] event is scheduled for October 23-27, 2023. I signed up StarlingX to participate, and also created an etherpad to start planning: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2023 Traditionally the community has been choosing time slots on the second and third days of the event. To follow the usual schedule, the time slots for the October event would be the following: * Tuesday (October 24) at 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC * Wednesday (October 25) at 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC Would the above time slots work for the community for the upcoming event? Also, please register[2] for the event if you are planning to attend. Registration is free, and it will ensure that you get all the event related communications to be up to date about how to join the sessions and participate. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? [1] https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ [2] https://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/?_ga=2.118740617.1815757535.1691527932-1627391255.1690284879 ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From kristin at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 9 17:08:29 2023 From: kristin at openinfra.dev (Kristin Barrientos) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 12:08:29 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Exploring the Intersection of AI and Open Source: Aug. 10 at 15 UTC Message-ID: <9A58AA1A-BC71-416E-A9CE-60055460C282@openinfra.dev> Hi everyone, This week?s OpenInfra Live episode is brought to you by open source community leaders. Episode: If you stand at the intersection of AI and open source you?ll find a very active discussion around how each concept can apply to the other but you?ll find few definitive answers. This panel of open source community leaders will discuss the current state of AI & open source, the collaborative efforts underway to improve global understanding of this emerging use case and how open source community members can participate in solving today?s unanswered questions. Date and time: Aug 10, 2023 at 10:00 CST (15:00 UTC) You can watch us live on: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLujjvEIbPk LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/events/7094342351971598337/comments/ WeChat: The recording will be posted on OpenInfra Foundation WeChat after the live stream Speakers: Mark Collier, Pamela Chestek, Stefano Maffulli, Armstrong Foundjem, Stephen O'Grady Have an idea for a future episode? Share it now at ideas.openinfra.live. Thanks, Kristin Barrientos Marketing Coordinator OpenInfra Foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Thu Aug 10 01:21:23 2023 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2023 21:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Creation of Openstack Antelope feature branch, Please Review Message-ID: <550f7eed-d5b3-2b55-20cf-d7ef4c48d9a9@eng.windriver.com> The following list of reviews sets up a feature branch to explore support for OpenStack Antelope: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ansible-playbooks/+/890943 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-dell-storage/+/890944 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-harbor/+/890945 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-istio/+/890989 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-kubernetes-power-manager/+/890946 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-kubevirt/+/890947 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-node-feature-discovery/+/890948 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-oran-o2/+/890990 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-power-metrics/+/890949 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-security-profiles-operator/+/890950 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-sriov-fec-operator/+/890951 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-sts-silicom/+/891002 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/audit-armada-app/+/890952 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/cert-manager-armada-app/+/890953 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/clients/+/890954 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/compile/+/890991 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/890955 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config-files/+/890956 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/containers/+/890957 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/distcloud/+/890992 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/distcloud-client/+/890959 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/890960 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/fault/+/890961 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/gui/+/890993 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ha/+/890962 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/helm-charts/+/890963 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/integ/+/890964 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines/+/890981 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/kernel/+/890994 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/manifest/+/890983 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/manifest/+/890984 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/metal/+/890965 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/metrics-server-armada-app/+/890966 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/monitor-armada-app/+/890967 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/monitoring/+/890995 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/nfv/+/890968 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/nginx-ingress-controller-armada-app/+/890969 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/oidc-auth-armada-app/+/890970 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/openstack-armada-app/+/890996 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/platform-armada-app/+/890971 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/portieris-armada-app/+/890972 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ptp-notification-armada-app/+/890973 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/public-keys/+/890941 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/rook-ceph/+/890997 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/890940 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/SDO-rv-service/+/890942 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/snmp-armada-app/+/890974 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/stx-puppet/+/890975 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/test/+/890976 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890998 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/890999 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/update/+/891000 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/upstream/+/890977 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/utilities/+/890978 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/vault-armada-app/+/890979 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/virt/+/891001 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/virtual-deployment/+/890982 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/zuul-jobs/+/890980 From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Sun Aug 13 17:15:17 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 17:15:17 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Aug 9, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call Aug 9, 2023 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch Debian Builds - Builds are passing, but the container builds weren't publishing images to dockerhub. - This has been addressed and a build is in progress to publish the images. - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/ - stx.6.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green. CENGN transition issues have been resolved. - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.6.0 - stx.7.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green. CENGN transition issues have been resolved. - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.7.0 - stx.8.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/8.0/ - Note: The same issue of not publishing images (as in the main branch) exists for stx.8.0 and will be resolved in the next build. - Sanity - Debian Main Branch Platform Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 9: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014394.html - Status: Green for SX and DX - Debian Main Branch stx-openstack Sanity - No sanity this week - reason: unknown as no reps were on the community call - Last sanity email sent on Aug 1: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014357.html - Status: RED - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029376 Fix merged on Aug 2 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2029378 Fix merged on Aug 3 - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - No Gerrit reviews needing attention this week. - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - Request from Juanita that engineers making contributions to the StarlingX docs copy the doc leads - Action: Juanita to send an email to the stx-discuss mailing list - Matrix setup for community collaboration - Ildiko is working with Jeremy on the setup and room creation - Launchpad status not being automatically updated - This has been addressed now! LPs are updating automatically. - We still suggest that developers check the status as this functionality has been broken multiple times in the past. ARs from Previous Meetings - dockerhub is cracking down on download limits - Davlet introduced an option to workaround this issue by having individual users login instead of using the same corporate IP - Action: Davlet to share this info on the mailing list and also open a stx.docs launchpad to add this info permanently to the project docs - Status: Closed - Email sent by Davlet. Wiki was also updated. - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014337.html - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014338.html - StarlingX docs were not updated as in general the build info in the docs is outdated and needs a bigger activity to clean it up. This is on the Build team's To-Do list. - Another suggestion is to look at an alternative to dockerhub - Examples: quay.io / nexsus-repo community edition / harbour - https://quay.io - From Ildiko: some open-infra projects moved to quay due to the dockerhub limits. Perhaps we can get some input from them. - https://www.sonatype.com/products/sonatype-nexus-repository - This would have to be handled as a feature propsal / spec given the large scope - Work would be required by the Build team - Note: StarlingX uses open-source images as well which are hosted in dockerhub - Allow stx-openstack to be built independently from the platform - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014206.html - The proposal has changed from using a manifest to using a branch. - Action: Build team to propose a timeline based on their priorities/availability - Status: Closed - The proposal has changed from using a manifest to using a branch. - Plan to start this work within a week. Expect to complete by mid-Aug (TBC) - StoryBoard tracking the work: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010797 - Renaming App Repos to remove the "armada" - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014215.html - Minor / cosmetic change. Lower priority, but would be nice to do. Should have no impact on runtime. - Action: Build team to propose a timeline based on their priorities/availability. (lower priority than the manifest repo re-config) - Status: Open - No update. Build team is focused on CENGN transition - Will likely only be planned after splitting the openstack build Open Requests for Help - User Questions - sent by Ildiko - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014391.html - Responses are coming in on the mailing list - Issues raised are related to networking setup. - Bruno/team provided an automated script for virtual installation (vbox) which should handle the networking setup. - As per Bruno, there are some vbox bugs which could be impacting users. Bruno will sent info on these unresolved issues. - Not able to use NVIDIA drivers with StarlingX vbox installation - raised in the meeting by Manju Rupani - NVIDIA drivers should not be required to successfully setup StarlingX vbox installation, so the suggestion is to try w/o them first. - Help w/ Install - Two people asking for help with installation on IRC - Bruno is trying to help them, but it appears that they are in a different timezone. If others can participate, it would be great. - Status: Open - Discussion is continuing between Bruno and others on IRC. This is related to the "User Questions" topic above. - The questions are a mix of how to setup a virtual env as well the installation itself - For virtual env, there are two options currently: vbox & libvirt/kvm - Note: There is recent effort to get libvirt/kvm working. Email reference: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014267.html From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Tue Aug 15 14:05:06 2023 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:05:06 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity and Regression - StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build [20230813T060000Z] results - Aug - 13 Message-ID: Hi all, StarlingX + STX-Openstack sanity and regression results: Overall Status: RED Build Info: Build date: Aug 13 - 20230813T060000Z ISO: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230813T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Helm Chart: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230813T060000Z/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-1.stx.66-debian-stable-versioned.tgz The STX-Openstack application failed to apply during the sanity installs due to #2031401 launchpad: STX-Openstack | fail to apply - kubeapptimeout ( #2031401 launchpad: STX-Openstack | fail to apply - kubeapptimeout). A fix is already being worked on by our development team for our next sanity run. Thanks, STX-Openstack Distro Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peng.Peng at windriver.com Tue Aug 15 14:23:08 2023 From: Peng.Peng at windriver.com (Peng, Peng) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 14:23:08 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20230813T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2023 August 14 (https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230813T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] DX sanity Passed: 19 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 19 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_swact_controller_platform PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_standby PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-True] PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-False] PASS test_force_reboot_host[standby_controller-False] PASS test_bmc_verify_bm_type_ipmi PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Tue Aug 15 18:34:05 2023 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 18:34:05 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Test Status Call - Aug 15, 2023 Message-ID: Hi everyone, Please find below the minutes from this week's StarlingX Test Status Call: Minutes for 08/15/2023 * Open Topics: ? None * Sanity Status: * Sanity on STX 9.0 - Green for SX and DX ? Last execution, August 14, 2023 - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014404.html * Sanity on STX 9.0 plus Openstack - Red ? Launchpad opened to track failure * #2031401 launchpad: STX-Openstack | fail to apply - kubeapptimeout - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2031401 ? Last execution, Aug 4, 2023 - Yellow - Results email:https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014398.html * Feature Test Status: o Feature testing is tracked in the following google sheet: * https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1El3g0ute5K2S5DTR9p_rxa1jQlq8gcUzgMCNCE_sx8g/edit#gid=968103774 ? Some features are in progress, sheet does need updating ACTION: Rob/Nimalini * Regression Testing will be tracked here closer to release end: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NjYk9N0whK91nHViB5HFG2C1-XdJ09StVuLMxsz0KAY/edit?pli=1#gid=1717644237 Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Tue Aug 15 19:04:37 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 19:04:37 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: OpenStack Distro Team Call (Aug 15, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-distro-openstack-meetings Minutes from the OpenStack Distro team call Aug 15, 2023 Build: - Build Issues: None Installation: - Installation Issues: # LP 2031401 - Investigation showed that this issue was introduced by https://opendev.org/starlingx/config/commit/612e70f4e20498a2f6ea528a6aa1072840287477 - Change will be reverted and fixed before a new submission, as peer discussion on LP. Sanity with stx-openstack (main branch): - Last Successful Execution: (OVS) Fri Aug 04 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: YELLOW ??????Sanity - Passed: 13 (86.67%) | Failed: 2 (13.33%) ??????Regression - Passed: 9 (75.0%) | Failed: 3 (25.0%) - Master Build (20230804T200138Z) - Last Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 15 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: RED ??????Sanity - Executed: 0 ??????Regression - Executed: 0 - Master Build (20230813T060000Z) - Installation issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2031401 - Bugs Affecting Weekly Sanity/Regression: - No Reproducible bugs currently open. Only intermittent issues # LP 2023657: STX-O| config-out-of-date alarm won't disappear on controller-1 after swact and reapplying app # LP 2012389: STX-Openstack: Failed to activate binding for port for live migration # LP 2007303: STX-Openstack: "nova live-migration" fails to live migrate after host is forcefully turned off/on - STX 9.0 Features Status: - Containerizing OpenStack clients: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010774 - Development is done (still using Ussuri based clients inside the container) - Documentation updates submitted: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/889646 - Waiting code review - Planning Testing Phase (will include automation framework updates) - OpenStack upversion (Antelope): https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010715 - In progress: developers are testing with locally built docker images (already upversioned) - Locally building the packages: faced an issue with required build dependencies that are higher than our current debian-bullseye.lst entries (oslo-db, sqlalchemy, keystone-auth) - Locally building the docker images: faced similar issue with required build dependencies (upper-constraints mismatches) - pip versioning conflict was solved - We need the platform/application manifest decoupling to finish this work - Build team provided a new/temporary branch 'f/antelope' for our development and build trials (Aug 10th) - Storyboard/Tasks for decoupling platform and application manifests: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010797 - Infra team is prioritizing the CENGN decommission and will act on it after that - 'f/antelope' branch should unblock us for now -- Best Regards, Thales Elero Cervi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Tue Aug 15 22:48:25 2023 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 22:48:25 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Contributions to StarlingX Docs @ https://docs.starlingx.io/ Message-ID: Hello All, Request you to copy one of the following StarlingX doc team members for any contributions made to the StarlingX docs (https://docs.starlingx.io/) to enable us track / participate in editorial reviews. Also, please raise a Story / Launchpad Bug, as required. * Juanita Balaraj (Juanita.balaraj at windriver.com) * Ronald Stone (Ronald.stone at windriver.com) * Elisa (elisamaraaoki.goncalves at windriver.com) Thank you, Regards, Juanita -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 16 03:24:18 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2023 20:24:18 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Thales, Thank you for sharing further information. I have a quick question below. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 9, 2023, at 05:14, Cervi, Thales Elero wrote: > > Hi Ildiko, > > I might be able to help with the last question: > > 4. Is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. > > I am pretty sure this is not being tested recently, so we should definitely revisit it and re-test if the community finds it important. > What I know from the past is that the stx-openstack application SHOULD BE supported on subclouds and SHOULD NOT BE supported on central (system controller) clouds. [Ildiko] This reads a little confusing to me. What does it mean that stx-openstack should not be supported on central clouds? Does that mean that the central cloud is not expected to run workloads? As OpenStack is a cloud platform that powers large data centers, I can see how it might not be implemented to run in sub-clouds, but rather in the central data center. +1 for more targeted testing in this area. > If we feel like revisiting this deployment, we can arrange it as part of stx.10 maybe? Do you mean the central cloud or the sub-cloud deployment? > [?] From Davlet.Panech at windriver.com Wed Aug 16 15:30:18 2023 From: Davlet.Panech at windriver.com (Panech, Davlet) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 15:30:18 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Jackie, CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current build set up is outlined below. You would need a dedicated server: * Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since most build steps run in docker containers * Docker * Kubernetes * Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines * git * git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo Other prerequisites: * You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate limits when pulling images * Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. * The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared functions under vars/ . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. * pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ * pipelines/parts/ : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo * scripts/ : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by Jenkinsfiles) Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: * /localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas * /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to copy & edit: * /localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping me if you have any more questions. Hope this helps, D. ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: August 9, 2023 10:28 AM To: Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, Linda Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io ; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Little, Scott ; Scott Kamp Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support ? Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines ? Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions ? Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN ? Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Joshua.Reed at windriver.com Wed Aug 16 16:00:26 2023 From: Joshua.Reed at windriver.com (Reed, Joshua) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:00:26 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Armada Deprecation Storyboard Link Message-ID: Hello All, At the 8/16/23 community meeting there was discussion about Armada deprecation, and I had an action to create a storyboard issue and provide the link. Turns out one already existed. Here is the link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010560. There are several tasks that need to be added still and some that already exist for work in progress. As additional work is put into motion, that is, the work we spoke about with the build team renaming git repositories that bear "armada" in the name then the tasks will be added to this story. Thanks! Joshua Reed -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vitalinobr at gmail.com Wed Aug 16 19:22:58 2023 From: vitalinobr at gmail.com (Vitalino Borges) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:22:58 -0300 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Message-ID: Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 16 20:17:41 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2023 13:17:41 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues Message-ID: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> Hi Scott, I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From Jackie.Huang at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 01:04:10 2023 From: Jackie.Huang at windriver.com (Huang, Jie (Jackie)) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 01:04:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Davlet, Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu and I will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are any more questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Panech, Davlet Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, Linda Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Jackie, CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current build set up is outlined below. You would need a dedicated server: ? Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since most build steps run in docker containers ? Docker ? Kubernetes ? Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines ? git ? git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo Other prerequisites: ? You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate limits when pulling images ? Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. ? The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared functions under vars/ . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. ? pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ ? pipelines/parts/ : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo ? scripts/ : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by Jenkinsfiles) Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: ? /localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas ? /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to copy & edit: ? /localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping me if you have any more questions. Hope this helps, D. ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Sent: August 9, 2023 10:28 AM To: Little, Scott >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li >; Wang, Linda > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Little, Scott >; Scott Kamp > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support * Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines * Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions * Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN * Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 02:23:28 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 02:23:28 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] IMPORTANT: ACTION REQUIRED: stx.9.0 Upcoming Milestone-3 Message-ID: Hello Project / Feature Leads, The stx.9.0 Milestone-3 [1] is coming up next week on August 23. There are currently many features with overdue forecast dates and no recent updates. The release team and TSC need the most up-to-date information to make the decision on this milestone as well as the rest of the stx.9.0 release plans. Release / Feature Planning Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit#gid=1107209846 Actions for each feature prime: - evaluate whether their feature still fits in the stx.9.0 time-frame based on the current milestones in the "Release Milestones" worksheet. - update column H (Final Disposition) with "In" or "Out" in the "Release Candidates" worksheet - update column P (Code Merged Forecast) and S (Feature Tested Forecast) for any overdue dates. - update column Q (Code Merged Actual) and T (Feature Tested Actual) with actuals if completed - add a comment in column W (Comments) with the any relevant comments; especially features that will not make it. Updates are required from Bruce Jones, Ram S, Veerasenareddy Burru, Rafal Lal, Nimalini Rasa, Carlos Fleck, Douglas Pereira, Guilherme Leite Please plan to complete the requested updates no later than Tuesday August 22, so we an review the information in the upcoming TSC/community meeting. References: [1] Milestone Criteria: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Release_Plan#Release_Milestones Milestone-3: - Feature code merged and feature testing completing within an acceptable timeframe - No blocking issues from Automated Sanity and Regression - No critical issues severely impacting system stability or release test activities - Release regression testing starting - Documentation plan defined; including a prioritized list of the various documentation items - Blog Posts available Regards Ghada - stx release prime From douglas.pereira at encora.com Thu Aug 17 11:24:23 2023 From: douglas.pereira at encora.com (Douglas Lopes Pereira) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:24:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vitalinobr at gmail.com Thu Aug 17 12:50:00 2023 From: vitalinobr at gmail.com (Vitalino Borges) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 09:50:00 -0300 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira < douglas.pereira at encora.com> escreveu: > Hi Vitalino, > > have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute > your tests? > > Regards, > Doug > > Douglas Lopes Pereira > Software Development Manager > > *M: *+55 (19) 99212-3212 > Campinas, BR > [image: Encora] > [image: We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering > services by Zinnov zones] > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM > *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with > only one NIC > > You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is > important > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Hi > > I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is > suggested to use three NICs. > > Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it > to only use one network interface? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruno.Muniz at encora.com Thu Aug 17 14:05:10 2023 From: Bruno.Muniz at encora.com (Bruno Drugowick Muniz) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 14:05:10 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at eng.windriver.com Thu Aug 17 14:47:23 2023 From: scott.little at eng.windriver.com (Scott.Little) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Here is a sample from a failed build ... docker build . --no-cache ... Sending build context to Docker daemon? 37.68MB Step 1/9 :FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating andupgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem.? We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. Scott On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Scott, > > I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: > > - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?:https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx > - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?:https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ > - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore > > Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? > > Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vitalinobr at gmail.com Thu Aug 17 14:51:33 2023 From: vitalinobr at gmail.com (Vitalino Borges) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:51:33 -0300 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz < Bruno.Muniz at encora.com> escreveu: > Hey, Vitalino. > > You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of > an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following > and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: > > * Ubuntu 20.04 > * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) > * 32 GiB of memory > * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 > *To:* Douglas Lopes Pereira > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex > with only one NIC > > You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is > important > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. > > My environment has 1 machine with: > * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 > * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 > * 240 GiB SSD Sata > * 1 NIC > > > > > Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira < > douglas.pereira at encora.com> escreveu: > > Hi Vitalino, > > have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute > your tests? > > Regards, > Doug > > Douglas Lopes Pereira > Software Development Manager > > *M: *+55 (19) 99212-3212 > Campinas, BR > [image: Encora] > [image: We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering > services by Zinnov zones] > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM > *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with > only one NIC > > You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is > important > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Hi > > I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is > suggested to use three NICs. > > Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it > to only use one network interface? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 15:16:44 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:16:44 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vitalino, OpenStack services are provided by applying the stx-openstack application to your system. This application is not applied/installed by default. So, you will need to download the application and apply it to your system. Before doing it though, you should refer to the documentation with instructions on how to plan and prepared your system to have the OpenStack application deployed: * Planning - OpenStack: https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/planning/index-planning-332af0718d15.html * Node labels: https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/node_management/openstack/using-labels-to-identify-openstack-nodes.html * StarlingX OpenStack installation: https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/deploy_install_guides/release/openstack/index-install-r7-os-adc44604968c.html Please pay attention to the amount of physical hardware you will be able to provide to your system. In theory you can apply the app on a virtualized installation of StarlingX and launch VMs within it, but it all boils down to how much computational resources you will be able to provide. You mentioned 4 cores (8 Threads), you need to discount the minimum number of CPU cores required to be assigned to the platform (i.e., 2 cores if I'm not wrong) and the remaining number of CPU cores will be available for both the application (i.e., kubernets pods) and the VMs you will launch with it. Then you can start by using shared cores and if you have enough room, play with configuring dedicated cores for your VMs. I personally had a hard time on launching VMs from within a virtual deployment with only 4 cores available, but I did not have 8 threads on that system. Hope this is helpful for you to get started and please do not hesitate in contacting the stx-openstack community using this mail list or the StarlingX Matrix room. By the way, our team meets every other week on Tuesdays at 11:00am Pacific Time. Next team meeting is planned for Aug 29th. You can find information about our meetings here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings#11:00am_Pacific_-_Distro_OpenStack_Team_Call_.28Bi-Weekly.29 Regards, Thales Cervi ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 AM To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 14:40:21 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> Here is a sample from a failed build ... docker build . --no-cache ... Sending build context to Docker daemon 37.68MB Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem.? We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Scott, > > I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: > > - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx > - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ > - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore > > Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? > > Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 14:44:42 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 10:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Here is a sample from a failed build ... docker build . --no-cache ... Sending build context to Docker daemon? 37.68MB Step 1/9 :FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating andupgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem.? We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. Scott On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Scott, > > I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: > > - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?:https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx > - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?:https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ > - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore > > Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? > > Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 15:47:47 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 11:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> There is also ... https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins Which contains the current state of the StarlingX jenkins setup, less a few credentials. It includes 'Debian_build_server.txt' with crude documentation of how the server was setup. Scott On 2023-08-16 21:04, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: > > Hi Davlet, > > Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu and I > will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are any more > questions. > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Panech, Davlet > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM > *To:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott > ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, > Linda > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) > *Subject:* Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Jackie, > > CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & > automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current > build set up is outlined below. > > You would need a dedicated server: > > ?Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since > most build steps run in docker containers > > ?Docker > > ?Kubernetes > > ?Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines > > ?git > > ?git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo > > Other prerequisites: > > ?You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate > limits when pulling images > > ?Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled > account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. > > Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: > https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to > define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the > corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. > > ?The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared > functions under vars/ > > . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. > > ?pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile > > : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ > > ?pipelines/parts/ > > : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a > Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs > pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo > > ?scripts/ > > : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by > Jenkinsfiles) > > Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: > > ?/localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas > > ?/localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives > > At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example > configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to > copy & edit: > > ?/localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example > > There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also > source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in > > > Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). > > Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping > me if you have any more questions. > > Hope this helps, > > D. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Sent:* August 9, 2023 10:28 AM > *To:* Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet > ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, > Linda > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > ; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) > *Subject:* RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Scott and Davlet, > > As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the > questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you > can, thanks! > > There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 > for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we > want to know is: > > 1.What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? > > 2.What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the > 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? > > a.E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? > > b.What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. > > c.Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? > > 3.How many efforts and how long will it take? > > 4.Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission > to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team > and I can also help > > on that if we got enough information. > > Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM > *To:* Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > ; Little, Scott > ; Scott Kamp > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Subject:* RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, > > I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | > OpenDev Etherpad : > > oARM Support > > ?_Action:_?Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide > assistance/access to some arm machines > > ?_Action:_?Scott Little to respond regarding build questions > > ?Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we > transition away from CENGN > > ?_Action:_?Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily > > So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: > > There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 > for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we > want to know is: > > 1.What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? > > a.E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? > > b.What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. > > c.Are there any docs for these setups? > > 2.How many efforts and how long will it take? > > 3.Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just > providing useful information? > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Trevor Tao > *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM > *To:* Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Cc:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Subject:* StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Steve, StarlingX: > > From the OS distro meeting > > yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to > our community to do the CI/CD related work. > > So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment > on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the > CI/CD issue here. > > Thanks, > > Best Regards, > > Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) > > ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd > > ?????????????? > > Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park?, > > No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China > > ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 > > Cell: ? +86-153 7109 6192 > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose > the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or > copy the information in any medium. Thank you. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Thu Aug 17 19:01:40 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 19:01:40 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Ildiko, Unfortunately, I am not the best person to talk about a Distributed Cloud deployment, don't have much experience with such installation. I will add this to my list to directly ping Greg once he is back from his vacation and we can elaborate on this topic for you and for the community. How does it sound? Thanks, Thales ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 12:24 AM To: Cervi, Thales Elero Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Thales, Thank you for sharing further information. I have a quick question below. Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 9, 2023, at 05:14, Cervi, Thales Elero wrote: > > Hi Ildiko, > > I might be able to help with the last question: > > 4. Is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. > > I am pretty sure this is not being tested recently, so we should definitely revisit it and re-test if the community finds it important. > What I know from the past is that the stx-openstack application SHOULD BE supported on subclouds and SHOULD NOT BE supported on central (system controller) clouds. [Ildiko] This reads a little confusing to me. What does it mean that stx-openstack should not be supported on central clouds? Does that mean that the central cloud is not expected to run workloads? As OpenStack is a cloud platform that powers large data centers, I can see how it might not be implemented to run in sub-clouds, but rather in the central data center. +1 for more targeted testing in this area. > If we feel like revisiting this deployment, we can arrange it as part of stx.10 maybe? Do you mean the central cloud or the sub-cloud deployment? > [?] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruno.Muniz at encora.com Thu Aug 17 20:27:58 2023 From: Bruno.Muniz at encora.com (Bruno Drugowick Muniz) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 20:27:58 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hun, sorry, I didn't go this far. We were able to run all the commands to install OpenStack (based on the documentation) but I personally haven't done anything more than that. We have a Review in progress working on this installation and setup of OpenStack on top of the Virtualbox install. ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Some people who received this message don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Aug 17 22:26:00 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:26:00 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7470937B-376D-410E-A029-5D31212D7DB3@openinfra.dev> Hi Thales, No worries, thank you for looking into it and offering to give a heads up to Greg as well when he?s back from vacation. Are there others with experience with Distributed Cloud setup to chime in? Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 17, 2023, at 12:01, Cervi, Thales Elero wrote: > > Hi Ildiko, > > Unfortunately, I am not the best person to talk about a Distributed Cloud deployment, don't have much experience with such installation. > I will add this to my list to directly ping Greg once he is back from his vacation and we can elaborate on this topic for you and for the community. > How does it sound? > > Thanks, > Thales > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 12:24 AM > To: Cervi, Thales Elero > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Thales, > > Thank you for sharing further information. I have a quick question below. > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > On Aug 9, 2023, at 05:14, Cervi, Thales Elero wrote: > > > > Hi Ildiko, > > > > I might be able to help with the last question: > > > 4. Is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. > > > > I am pretty sure this is not being tested recently, so we should definitely revisit it and re-test if the community finds it important. > > What I know from the past is that the stx-openstack application SHOULD BE supported on subclouds and SHOULD NOT BE supported on central (system controller) clouds. > > [Ildiko] This reads a little confusing to me. What does it mean that stx-openstack should not be supported on central clouds? Does that mean that the central cloud is not expected to run workloads? > > As OpenStack is a cloud platform that powers large data centers, I can see how it might not be implemented to run in sub-clouds, but rather in the central data center. > > +1 for more targeted testing in this area. > > > If we feel like revisiting this deployment, we can arrange it as part of stx.10 maybe? > > Do you mean the central cloud or the sub-cloud deployment? > > > [?] From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Aug 17 22:51:59 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2023 15:51:59 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Space and Rooms on Matrix Message-ID: <7AF26C1B-83AA-444E-9C96-35F1B723AD8A@openinfra.dev> A StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you with exciting news. Jeremy helped to set up the new StarlingX space, which is now available on Matrix, on the opendev.org server! As the community favored to set up a room for each project team, we decided to also create a ?space? on Matrix that groups all the StarlingX rooms together. The available rooms are the following: - StarlingX General - StarlingX Build - StarlingX Containers - StarlingX Distro - StarlingX DistCloud - StarlingX Docs - StarlingX Flock - StarlingX Networking - StarlingX OpenStack - StarlingX Release - StarlingX Test You can access the StarlingX space here: https://matrix.to/#/#starlingx:opendev.org As a reminder, you can use the following resources to pick a client, register and join the new space: - Information about Matrix: https://matrix.org - There are different options to use as a browser or desktop client. Many of them are also available on smartphones: + Element (one of the more popular ones, this is what I?m using) - https://element.io + Some other options include ~ Weechat - https://github.com/poljar/weechat-matrix ~ SchildiChat - https://schildi.chat/ ~ FluffyChat - https://fluffychat.im/ + There is documentation available in the Zuul community?s docs about how to register - https://zuul-ci.org/docs/zuul/latest/howtos/matrix.html#create-an-account - Once you have your account set up, you can access the StarlingX space by searching for #starlingx:opendev.org + After you joined the space itself, you can choose which rooms you would like join in addition I?m still working on room descriptions, please let me know if your team has a preference to add! Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From Jackie.Huang at windriver.com Fri Aug 18 05:33:21 2023 From: Jackie.Huang at windriver.com (Huang, Jie (Jackie)) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 05:33:21 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> References: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> Message-ID: Hi Scott, Thanks for sharing, it?s very helpful. Thanks, Jackie From: Little, Scott Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:48 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Panech, Davlet ; Tianyu Li Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform There is also ... https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins Which contains the current state of the StarlingX jenkins setup, less a few credentials. It includes 'Debian_build_server.txt' with crude documentation of how the server was setup. Scott On 2023-08-16 21:04, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: Hi Davlet, Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu and I will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are any more questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Panech, Davlet Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, Linda Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Jackie, CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current build set up is outlined below. You would need a dedicated server: 1. Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since most build steps run in docker containers 2. Docker 3. Kubernetes 4. Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines 5. git 6. git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo Other prerequisites: 1. You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate limits when pulling images 2. Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. 1. The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared functions under vars/ . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. 2. pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ 3. pipelines/parts/ : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo 4. scripts/ : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by Jenkinsfiles) Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas 2. /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to copy & edit: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping me if you have any more questions. Hope this helps, D. ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Sent: August 9, 2023 10:28 AM To: Little, Scott >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li >; Wang, Linda > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Little, Scott >; Scott Kamp > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support ? Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines ? Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions ? Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN ? Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From douglas.pereira at encora.com Fri Aug 18 11:50:01 2023 From: douglas.pereira at encora.com (Douglas Lopes Pereira) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:50:01 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Space and Rooms on Matrix In-Reply-To: <7AF26C1B-83AA-444E-9C96-35F1B723AD8A@openinfra.dev> References: <7AF26C1B-83AA-444E-9C96-35F1B723AD8A@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Very good! Thank you Ildiko and Jeremy. I managed to join the space and the mentioned rooms. Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 7:51 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Space and Rooms on Matrix External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. A StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you with exciting news. Jeremy helped to set up the new StarlingX space, which is now available on Matrix, on the opendev.org server! As the community favored to set up a room for each project team, we decided to also create a ?space? on Matrix that groups all the StarlingX rooms together. The available rooms are the following: - StarlingX General - StarlingX Build - StarlingX Containers - StarlingX Distro - StarlingX DistCloud - StarlingX Docs - StarlingX Flock - StarlingX Networking - StarlingX OpenStack - StarlingX Release - StarlingX Test You can access the StarlingX space here: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmatrix.to%2F%23%2F%23starlingx%3Aopendev.org&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098522985769%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4S30eW8%2BkaON7%2Fw4AVG75dRLpgUHVWiJehyqQHS3aAM%3D&reserved=0 As a reminder, you can use the following resources to pick a client, register and join the new space: - Information about Matrix: https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmatrix.org%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098522985769%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=51hZGX2JMN4zBev3rtdbLN8iQ%2Bc3gfuQXYEioNXQmig%3D&reserved=0 - There are different options to use as a browser or desktop client. Many of them are also available on smartphones: + Element (one of the more popular ones, this is what I?m using) - https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felement.io%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098522985769%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=b42auUAGgoD3jKD69ThhlOmXowZJkITKX9PUuU1YfnQ%3D&reserved=0 + Some other options include ~ Weechat - https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fpoljar%2Fweechat-matrix&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098522985769%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=t9GxpxwJ%2B19fYcL4DIFrIKpyi%2BUM%2FyHl%2FN6D9WWH8YM%3D&reserved=0 ~ SchildiChat - https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fschildi.chat%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098523142573%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rVJOK1ehn%2FwwEudYf7MGnOwVPSW0OLGu8Q6M%2BkJt7rs%3D&reserved=0 ~ FluffyChat - https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffluffychat.im%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098523142573%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=anpsJhenWq%2FQ%2Fy3O6Pex0wNDxekw14wAuRRaoNLsf%2Bw%3D&reserved=0 + There is documentation available in the Zuul community?s docs about how to register - https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzuul-ci.org%2Fdocs%2Fzuul%2Flatest%2Fhowtos%2Fmatrix.html%23create-an-account&data=05%7C01%7Cdouglas.pereira%40encora.com%7C58d9fa912ead482a194c08db9f755604%7C1e0c92b0f1bd441ebbe6c778f9ced553%7C0%7C0%7C638279098523142573%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fwO64UCZoUUy8pkz19XP5zfTTyHKOydJcKBGyrE0Ktk%3D&reserved=0 - Once you have your account set up, you can access the StarlingX space by searching for #starlingx:opendev.org + After you joined the space itself, you can choose which rooms you would like join in addition I?m still working on room descriptions, please let me know if your team has a preference to add! Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From douglas.pereira at encora.com Fri Aug 18 11:54:06 2023 From: douglas.pereira at encora.com (Douglas Lopes Pereira) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 11:54:06 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vitalino, perhaps you could share what you are trying to accomplish. My initial suggestion was to create a VM using VirtualBox on your Ubuntu that was supposed to be deployed on bare metal. If you are planning to start VMs on top of StarlingX you will need stx-openstack as Thales and Bruno indicated. By the way, Bruno and his team created a set of scripts to automate the installation of starlingX on a virtualbox setup. Perhaps Bruno could share a link for those scripts. Regards, Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 AM To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Some people who received this message don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruno.Muniz at encora.com Fri Aug 18 12:41:06 2023 From: Bruno.Muniz at encora.com (Bruno Drugowick Muniz) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:41:06 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The instructions to use the script Douglas mentioned were recently merged to the Docs: https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/release/virtual/automated_install.html ________________________________ From: Douglas Lopes Pereira Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 08:54 To: Vitalino Borges ; Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Hi Vitalino, perhaps you could share what you are trying to accomplish. My initial suggestion was to create a VM using VirtualBox on your Ubuntu that was supposed to be deployed on bare metal. If you are planning to start VMs on top of StarlingX you will need stx-openstack as Thales and Bruno indicated. By the way, Bruno and his team created a set of scripts to automate the installation of starlingX on a virtualbox setup. Perhaps Bruno could share a link for those scripts. Regards, Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 AM To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Some people who received this message don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vitalinobr at gmail.com Fri Aug 18 13:29:47 2023 From: vitalinobr at gmail.com (Vitalino Borges) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 10:29:47 -0300 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I have one machine with: - Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 - 32 GiB of memory DDR4 - 240 GiB SSD Sata - 1 NIC I want to set up a full environment (StarlingX and OpenStack) with just this machine. The idea is to be able to provision instances and explore other OpenStack features (only for test purposes, not production). I installed the starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso on this machine in "stx aio-sx" mode. But looking at the documentation, the Simplex mode requires 3 NICs. I don't have any experience with StarlingX, I would like to hear from you the best practices for testing it. I imagine the path is something like this: - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/deploy_install_guides/release/bare_metal/aio_simplex_install_kubernetes.html - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/deploy_install_guides/release/openstack/install.html But I don't know if having only one NIC is a problem. Em sex., 18 de ago. de 2023 ?s 09:41, Bruno Drugowick Muniz < Bruno.Muniz at encora.com> escreveu: > The instructions to use the script Douglas mentioned were recently merged > to the Docs: > https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/release/virtual/automated_install.html > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Douglas Lopes Pereira > *Sent:* Friday, August 18, 2023 08:54 > *To:* Vitalino Borges ; Bruno Drugowick Muniz < > Bruno.Muniz at encora.com> > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex > with only one NIC > > Hi Vitalino, > > perhaps you could share what you are trying to accomplish. My initial > suggestion was to create a VM using VirtualBox on your Ubuntu that was > supposed to be deployed on bare metal. If you are planning to start VMs on > top of StarlingX you will need stx-openstack as Thales and Bruno indicated. > > By the way, Bruno and his team created a set of scripts to automate the > installation of starlingX on a virtualbox setup. Perhaps Bruno could share > a link for those scripts. > > Regards, > > Douglas Lopes Pereira > Software Development Manager > > *M: *+55 (19) 99212-3212 > Campinas, BR > [image: Encora] > [image: We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering > services by Zinnov zones] > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 AM > *To:* Bruno Drugowick Muniz > *Cc:* Douglas Lopes Pereira ; > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex > with only one NIC > > Some people who received this message don't often get email from > vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important > > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Cool. > > And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via > Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? > > Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz < > Bruno.Muniz at encora.com> escreveu: > > Hey, Vitalino. > > You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of > an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following > and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: > > * Ubuntu 20.04 > * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) > * 32 GiB of memory > * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 > *To:* Douglas Lopes Pereira > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex > with only one NIC > > You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is > important > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. > > My environment has 1 machine with: > * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 > * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 > * 240 GiB SSD Sata > * 1 NIC > > > > > Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira < > douglas.pereira at encora.com> escreveu: > > Hi Vitalino, > > have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute > your tests? > > Regards, > Doug > > Douglas Lopes Pereira > Software Development Manager > > *M: *+55 (19) 99212-3212 > Campinas, BR > [image: Encora] > [image: We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering > services by Zinnov zones] > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Vitalino Borges > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM > *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io < > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io> > *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with > only one NIC > > You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is > important > External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you > recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > Hi > > I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is > suggested to use three NICs. > > Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it > to only use one network interface? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From douglas.pereira at encora.com Fri Aug 18 16:58:38 2023 From: douglas.pereira at encora.com (Douglas Lopes Pereira) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:58:38 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I'm pretty sure you will need the three NICs if you want to run it directly on bare metal. That is why I suggested you run it on Virtual Box first. Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 10:29 AM To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira ; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have one machine with: - Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 - 32 GiB of memory DDR4 - 240 GiB SSD Sata - 1 NIC I want to set up a full environment (StarlingX and OpenStack) with just this machine. The idea is to be able to provision instances and explore other OpenStack features (only for test purposes, not production). I installed the starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso on this machine in "stx aio-sx" mode. But looking at the documentation, the Simplex mode requires 3 NICs. I don't have any experience with StarlingX, I would like to hear from you the best practices for testing it. I imagine the path is something like this: - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/deploy_install_guides/release/bare_metal/aio_simplex_install_kubernetes.html - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/deploy_install_guides/release/openstack/install.html But I don't know if having only one NIC is a problem. Em sex., 18 de ago. de 2023 ?s 09:41, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: The instructions to use the script Douglas mentioned were recently merged to the Docs: https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/release/virtual/automated_install.html ________________________________ From: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 08:54 To: Vitalino Borges >; Bruno Drugowick Muniz > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Hi Vitalino, perhaps you could share what you are trying to accomplish. My initial suggestion was to create a VM using VirtualBox on your Ubuntu that was supposed to be deployed on bare metal. If you are planning to start VMs on top of StarlingX you will need stx-openstack as Thales and Bruno indicated. By the way, Bruno and his team created a set of scripts to automate the installation of starlingX on a virtualbox setup. Perhaps Bruno could share a link for those scripts. Regards, Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:51 AM To: Bruno Drugowick Muniz > Cc: Douglas Lopes Pereira >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC Some people who received this message don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Cool. And pod of OpenStack Nova does provision KVM VMs (and networks) via Libvirtd running bare metal on your Ubuntu? Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 11:05, Bruno Drugowick Muniz > escreveu: Hey, Vitalino. You should be able to get an All-in-one Simplex (AIO-SX) running on top of an Operating System via VirtualBox with that hardware. I have the following and I'm able to run an AIO-SX: * Ubuntu 20.04 * Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-8265U CPU @ 1.60GHz (4 cores, 8 threads) * 32 GiB of memory * 512 GiB SSD (but you might be good with only 240) ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 09:50 To: Douglas Lopes Pereira > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I think that I do not have resources for running StarlingX virtualized. My environment has 1 machine with: * Intel Xeon E5-2667V4 * 32 GiB of memory DDR4 * 240 GiB SSD Sata * 1 NIC Em qui., 17 de ago. de 2023 ?s 08:24, Douglas Lopes Pereira > escreveu: Hi Vitalino, have you tried to run StarlingX on a virtualized environment to execute your tests? Regards, Doug Douglas Lopes Pereira Software Development Manager M: +55 (19) 99212-3212 Campinas, BR [Encora] [We are proud to be recognized as Leaders in digital engineering services by Zinnov zones] ________________________________ From: Vitalino Borges > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 4:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX All-in-one (AIO) Simplex with only one NIC You don't often get email from vitalinobr at gmail.com. Learn why this is important External Mail: Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi I saw that in the All-in-one Simplex configuration documentation, it is suggested to use three NICs. Just for testing purposes with StarlingX, is it possible to configure it to only use one network interface? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Fri Aug 18 19:13:17 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 12:13:17 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> Message-ID: <4E226ECC-6367-485D-94CA-EBB10389CFB0@openinfra.dev> Hi Scott, Great, thank you for the pointers. I reached out to Docker on the channel that is dedicated for their open source program, and also included the links that you added below so they have the full context. I will get back with updates on this thread, if I receive anything beyond what you got on the forums already. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:40, Scott Little wrote: > > Here is a sample from a failed build ... > > docker build . --no-cache ... > Sending build context to Docker daemon 37.68MB > > Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 > toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit > make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 > > One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem. We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. > > I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... > > https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 > > https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 > > We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. > > > > On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: >> >> - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx >> - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ >> - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore >> >> Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? >> >> Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Director of Community >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Mon Aug 21 00:53:54 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 00:53:54 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: StarlingX Release Meeting - Aug 16/2023 Message-ID: Agenda/Minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-releases Release Team Meeting - Aug 16 2023 stx.9.0 - Release/Feature Planning: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing - Upcoming Release Milestones - Milestone-3: Aug 23 - Feature Status - Not getting up-to-date feature updates from the various primes - Action: Ghada to send an email to the mailing list highlighing that MS-3 is coming up and that we need the feature info to make the decision. - Status: Done - Once this data is available, review the status with the steering committee and decide on next steps: - Do we re-forecast MS-3 or move forward with it with the current content? - Are there must-have features that we need to delay the release for? - Feature Status/Risks - Openstack Rebase to Antelope is at risk of delivery within the stx.9.0 release timeframe - Development was delayed due to multiple issues. Currently doing development on an experimental branch. - Merging back to the main branch is a large effort. Estimate is not fully understood. - This will require feature size work for the build team as well - Action: Thales bring this topic to the TSC on Aug 23. Also suggested to send an email with this topic to the mailing list prior to the meeting. - Release Verification Status - Individual feature testing is progressing. - As per Rob Cooke (Test PL), release regression is at risk due to resourcing - Need to get a better view of the release content to better assess the verification status. Blogs - FEC Device Configurability (fec-operator Integration) for ACC100 & N3000 - Prime: Balendu (Mouli) Burla - Forecast: May 1 >> May 19 >> Aug 15 - Status: Confirmed / Not posted - PTP O-RAN Compliant API Notification - Prime: Ghada Khalil - Forecast: Jun 30 >> Oct 15 - Status: Confirmed / Not posted From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Mon Aug 21 01:09:58 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 01:09:58 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Aug 16, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call Aug 16, 2023 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch Debian Builds - Green. Issue with publishing images to dockerhub has been addressed. - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/ - Antelope Feature Branch Debian Builds - Green - stx.6.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.6.0 - stx.7.0 Weekly RC Builds - Red. Build failed due to disk space error; even though there should be enough - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.7.0 - stx.8.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/8.0/ - Note: The same issue of not publishing images (as in the main branch) exists for stx.8.0 and will be resolved in the next build. - Sanity - Debian Main Branch Platform Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 13: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014404.html - Status: Green for SX and DX - Debian Main Branch stx-openstack Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 13: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014403.html - Status: Red / Blocked - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2031401 - Introduced by a recent code change which was reverted. Should not impact the next sanity - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - ARM Spec Review - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/specs/+/890514 - Has +1 from Chris. ScottL will review today. Greg is only available next week. - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - stx.9.0 Release Status - Ghada Khalil - Milestone-3 is planned for next week - Not enough information is available from the feature primes to make the decision on the milestone and follow-up release plans - Risk was also raised for release verification due to resourcing constraints - ARM Enablement - Jackie Huang - The ARM team is providing 6 servers to the StarlingX community, but there is no place to host them. - The ARM team is not able to host them directly for public community access - Steve Geary has been trying to find space to host these machines, but not much traction to date over many weeks - Need a forum to escalate this issue. Agreed to start with the TSC and go from there - Action: Steve/Jackie to raise this issue w/ the TSC on Aug 23. - The ARM team also have questions about how to setup a CI/CD on those machines - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014396.html - Action: Davlet to reply to the email with some initial responses - dockerhub changed StarlingX from free-team to team - Scott Little - This was done automatically by dockerhub. Not clear what the reason is. - The cost is $300/year. Mike Matteson was following up - Action: Scott to connect Ildiko with Mike - Action: Ildiko to raise the topic of looking for alternatives to dockerhub with the TSC - Ultimately, this will become a community resoucing discussion - Looking for community members to participate in US gov security initiative - Manju Rupani - Suggested to introduce the topic on the mailing list and see if there is any interest - Action: Manju to send to the mailing list. ARs from Previous Meetings - Request from Juanita that engineers making contributions to the StarlingX docs copy the doc leads - Action: Juanita to send an email to the stx-discuss mailing list - Status: Closed. Email sent to mailing list: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014407.html - Renaming App Repos to remove the "armada" - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014215.html - Minor / cosmetic change. Lower priority, but would be nice to do. Should have no impact on runtime. - Work required by Build team and Container/Apps team. - Action: Joshua Reed to create a story board to track this work. - Update: 8/16/23 - Storyboard link: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010560 Open Requests for Help - User Questions - sent by Ildiko - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014391.html - Responses are coming in on the mailing list - Issues raised are related to networking setup. - Bruno/team provided an automated script for virtual installation (vbox) which should handle the networking setup. - As per Bruno, there are some vbox bugs which could be impacting users. Bruno will sent info on these unresolved issues. - Status: Open - Bruno responded with suggestions to the mailing list, but haven't received further feedback - Not able to use NVIDIA drivers with StarlingX vbox installation - raised in the meeting by Manju Rupani - NVIDIA drivers should not be required to successfully setup StarlingX vbox installation, so the suggestion is to try w/o them first. - Status: Open - Still no success; looking for an alternative machine to setup the vbox installation - Help w/ Install - Two people asking for help with installation on IRC - Bruno is trying to help them, but it appears that they are in a different timezone. If others can participate, it would be great. - Status: Open - Discussion is continuing between Bruno and others on IRC. This is related to the "User Questions" topic above. - The questions are a mix of how to setup a virtual env as well the installation itself - For virtual env, there are two options currently: vbox & libvirt/kvm - Note: There is recent effort to get libvirt/kvm working. Email reference: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014267.html From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Mon Aug 21 14:25:57 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:25:57 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX 9.0 - OpenStack upversion to Atenlope (2023.1) release Message-ID: Hi community and TSC, I'm writing this e-mail as part of my action point from our last Release meeting, to bring up this topic prior to our next TSC call. I explicitly added the TSC members to this email Cc list, as peer request. We have this OpenStack upversion planned as a feature for next StarlingX release (9.0), but during the development of it we found that the most difficult part is to properly build it without affecting the platform, since several components are shared. First, the OpenStack client packages that we currently build, we build along with platform packages as part of the starlingx/upstream repository (see discussion: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014222.html). We started relocating the clients packages to starlingx/openstack-armada-app, but also realized that there are several package dependencies that would conflict versions against what is currently used by other platform packages. This is also true for our docker images and the necessary packages/wheels that we install when building it. Mainly, there would be two repositories with points of conflict: starlingx/root and starlingx/tools. Therefore, the splitting is not straightforward and would require extra investigation (along with the Build team) to be done. So, the Build team helped us providing a "feature branch" (i.e., f/antelope) in which we can move and change all that we need in order to have a buildable application that will use OpenStack clients and services on the Antelope (2023.1) release. That unblocked us, but did not solve all of the problems, since when the time comes for us to make the official StarlingX 9.0 releasee, code-freeze and branching, we will do it from master and not from the feature branch. We would have to bring what we changed in "f/antelope" to "master" prior to our release, but that would require not only the manifest split but also a solution for the shared/conflicting dependencies on starlingx/root and starlingx/tools. Scott already told us what are the only two options we have for this merge: 1. We find a way to separate the packages dependencies by repository, something like moving this list of dependencies and versions from starlingx/root and starlingx/tools to the specific repo. This option would be ideal, since it is less error prone (i.e., do not affect other starlingx repositories/packages) but is also the option the required more work/investigation. Scott thinks it would be an entirely new feature for the build team. 2. We decide that the dependencies (i.e., packages) versions will now be matching the Antelope needed versions for all packages. This would affect not only the build but also the runtime of so many parts of the platform, that would require a careful testing procedure and it is unpredictable on how many side-effects and extra-fixes would be needed. Tried to keep this summary short enough to bring everyone the context of this problem before our next TSC meeting. Best regards, Thales Elero Cervi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Mon Aug 21 14:40:03 2023 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:40:03 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 11-08-2023 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are the week of August 11th doc team meeting minutes. Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Fridays 6:00 a.m. PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 11-August-23 Status: - Stx 9.0 Release Tracking Spreadsheet: Doc Stories are tracked in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing. - To add stories that are planned for Stx 9.0 - AR Juanita - WIP - Update the "Install StarlingX Kuberbetes in a virtual environment" docs; https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/deploy_install_guides/release/index-install-r7-8966076f0e81.html - Discussion about Merging the Installation Guides ; Virtual env with the Bare metal docs. WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/876107 - Split the docs and retain them as separate guides at a high level. Resue content from Bare Metal in the Virtual env docs. - Opensource Project versions - Add Opensource Project versions in the Stx 9.0 RN - AR Juanita - Create a story to track and update - DONE https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010866 - Discussion about the tox version : https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/890833 - AR Ron / Bruno (Allow list to be reviewed) - AR Ron - Doc gerrit reviews raised - Process to be followed. All core doc reviewers to be copied - AR Juanita to send out an email to the community. - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/backup/kubernetes/backing-up-starlingx-system-data.html - AR Ron to create a LP bug to remove the Important notice or change the version string if the notice is required. - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/889408 - AR Ron to check if this impacts other releases Gerrit reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 3 Reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 7 outstanding bugs- Closed 3- The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP. Teams to add all the impacted Releases when raising a LP bug Miscellaneous Updates: - We have a fault that is preventing LPs from closing when the corresponding Gerrit WFs. Ron spoke with Jeremy Stanley, who reproduced the bug and is investigating. - Pending - Ghada sent out an email to the Stx discuss group; https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014361.html - Ron to update the Verified H/W page with the automated script updates https://www.windriver.com/studio/operator/self-validated-and-certified-hosts# - Currently Commented out - Script needs to be updated- Waiting for updates to the script -AR Ron - WIP - Bruno Muniz showed interest in creating DOC Videos supporting the StarlingX Installation Process. To check with Ildiko / Greg whether this is ok. These Videos can be hosted in a location in StarlingX. The Installation Docs can point to these videos - AR Bruno to get approvals from Ildiko / Greg - Future Update - Sphinx Tools - Need to have further discussions about the version used upstream vs. downstream - AR Ron -To determine version. - Docker Container upstream / downstream - AR Ron (Discuss it with Greg / Ildiko) - a long term project - Pending - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Engineering Status: StarlingX Eng Stx Status: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status StarlingX Eng Status 2023 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores ____________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From fungi at yuggoth.org Mon Aug 21 14:47:50 2023 From: fungi at yuggoth.org (Jeremy Stanley) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:47:50 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 11-08-2023 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20230821144749.vapgaavbjs5ea5z4@yuggoth.org> On 2023-08-21 14:40:03 +0000 (+0000), Balaraj, Juanita wrote: [...] > We have a fault that is preventing LPs from closing when the > corresponding Gerrit WFs. Ron spoke with Jeremy Stanley, who > reproduced the bug and is investigating. - Pending - Ghada sent > out an email to the Stx discuss group; > https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014361.html [...] See the reply[*] to that message, this should be working since August 3, but please do follow up if it still doesn't seem to be. [*] https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014366.html -- Jeremy Stanley -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 963 bytes Desc: not available URL: From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Mon Aug 21 14:57:03 2023 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 14:57:03 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 18-08-2023 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are last week's doc team meeting minutes. Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Fridays 6:00 a.m. PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 18-August-23 Status: - Stx 9.0 Release Tracking Spreadsheet: Doc Stories are tracked in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing. - To add stories that are planned for Stx 9.0 - AR Juanita - WIP (add / replan as required) - Update the "Install StarlingX Kuberbetes in a virtual environment" docs; https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.8.0/deploy_install_guides/release/index-install-r7-8966076f0e81.html - Discussion about Merging the Installation Guides ; Virtual env with the Bare metal docs. WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/876107 - Split the docs and retain them as separate guides at a high level. Resue content from Bare Metal in the Virtual env docs. - Discussion about the tox version : https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/890833 - AR Ron / Bruno (Allow list to be reviewed) - AR Ron - Doc gerrit reviews raised - Process to be followed - See the Documentation Contributor Guide - https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/doc_contribute_guide.html - AR Juanita - DONE sent an email to the Starlingx discuss group. - Documentation Contributor Guide - StarlingX documentation - https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/doc_contribute_guide.html - All to update the Contributor guide on an ongoing basis for new Styles / Standards implemented. - Stories that are in master should this be picked to r8 - AR Juanita - Confirmed this is not required and stays in Stx master. DONE - https://docs.starlingx.io/r/stx.7.0/backup/kubernetes/backing-up-starlingx-system-data.html - AR Ron to create a LP bug to remove the Important Notice or fix the version string - DONE version string fixed. - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/889408 - AR Ron to check if this impacts other releases Gerrit reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 3 Reviews Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 11 outstanding bugs. The DOC team to create LP defects corresponding with any DS defects - WIP. Teams to add all the impacted Releases when raising a LP bug. Miscellaneous Updates: - We have a fault that is preventing LPs from closing when the corresponding Gerrit WFs. Ron spoke with Jeremy Stanley, who reproduced the bug and is investigating. - Pending - Ghada sent out an email to the Stx discuss group; https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014361.html - Awaiting Closure - Ron to update the Verified H/W page with the automated script updates https://www.windriver.com/studio/operator/self-validated-and-certified-hosts# - Currently Commented out - Script needs to be updated- Waiting for updates to the script -AR Ron - WIP - Bruno Muniz showed interest in creating DOC Videos supporting the StarlingX Installation Process. To check with Ildiko / Greg whether this is ok. These Videos can be hosted in a location in StarlingX. The Installation Docs can point to these videos - AR Bruno to get approvals from Ildiko / Greg for a future Update - Sphinx Tools - Need to have further discussions about the version used upstream vs. downstream - AR Ron -To determine version. - Docker Container upstream / downstream - AR Ron (Discuss it with Greg / Ildiko) - a long term project - Pending - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Engineering Status: StarlingX Eng Stx Status: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status StarlingX Eng Status 2023 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores ____________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Mon Aug 21 15:36:11 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2023 08:36:11 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <4E226ECC-6367-485D-94CA-EBB10389CFB0@openinfra.dev> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> <4E226ECC-6367-485D-94CA-EBB10389CFB0@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <3D52AA13-4300-4C7E-BCBD-4268997C3F7D@openinfra.dev> Hi Scott, I also just recognized, that the snipped that you copied in refers to a golang image: ?Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit.?. DO you have the same issue with StarlingX images as well? Or is it always the golang step that fails? Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 18, 2023, at 12:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi Scott, > > Great, thank you for the pointers. > > I reached out to Docker on the channel that is dedicated for their open source program, and also included the links that you added below so they have the full context. I will get back with updates on this thread, if I receive anything beyond what you got on the forums already. > > Thanks and Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > >> On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:40, Scott Little wrote: >> >> Here is a sample from a failed build ... >> >> docker build . --no-cache ... >> Sending build context to Docker daemon 37.68MB >> >> Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 >> toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit >> make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 >> >> One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem. We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. >> >> I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... >> >> https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 >> >> https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 >> >> We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. >> >> >> >> On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>> >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: >>> >>> - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx >>> - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ >>> - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore >>> >>> Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? >>> >>> Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. >>> >>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>> Director of Community >>> Open Infrastructure Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 03:52:35 2023 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 03:52:35 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StartlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS Meeting: July 25, 2023 Message-ID: July 25, 2023 Attendees: Trevor Tao, Linda, Davelet, Mark, Charles, Jackie Huang, Steve G., Scott L. 1. Generic Topics * 1.1 Split package list between repositories (ISO and container images) * Separation of the list is done per Davlet. * AI: Devlet will check the documentation on package list. * 1.2 Log into the git before download the source. * How to pass the credential through the tooling layer when log into git repo. * workaround: currently use repo sync outside of the containers. * AI: Scott to write up a feature request for the tool - file a request in Story Board. * Created: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010777 * 1.3 Pre-patch ISO (Luis Sampaio?) (Carols Pocahy replacing Luis Barbosa) * AI: to invite Carlos Pocahy to this meeting to discuss Pre-patch ISO. [Done] * Carlos to confirm if Luis Sampaio is the person who will be working on this feature. * Note: Luis S. is out on leave. Need someone from the community to help with the feature. * AI: follow up on who will be picking up this feature request [lwang] 2. ARM support * CENGN: move to another provider. Early development don't expect anything for at least 2 months. * Wind River will be provide it. Will be available via WindRiver Lab. * a. Equipment * Ampere provided 6 servers * They like to know where the new location is, so that they can send the servers to the new location? * A: We do NOT have rack space or power for the proposed equipment at this time. Ampere will have to find a location on their own. * Jackie: last week had a meeting with ARM. Steve G said will have the location in 2 weeks. * The CENGN lab is now moved to the current Ottawa office lab. * 6 Ampere servers will go to where the CENGN lab is going to be. 2 for build, 4 for testing. * Can the community support the lab? * AI: ARM is still waiting on a location to host these servers. AI: Steve is help looking for a location to host these servers. * AI: who from the community can help set up these servers? and support the CI/CD on ARM platform * b. Porting still in progress (Jackie) * finished all packages built, started with StartlingX 8.0 master for ARM. * RT kernel fixed. * Some kernel modules don't work * QEMU is not working yet. Waiting on kernel up-rev, then and see if QEMU can be fixed then. * Container Image * For ARM Build, already push the container image for ARM arch. and push them to docker hub, and startlingX. * Test on simplex, duplex, Low latency profile, standard control, 2 kernels, and 2 storage nodes. * Packages for x86_64 are in CNGN, need to push ARM packages there. * Secureboot is disabled for now. Will do it in the future. * ELF SDK is used to build image. Need to push the SDK to CNGN, no permission to push to CNGN yet, it is on local disk. * Need to change meta-lat layer for ELF SDK, but want to link the task to different repo, but can't. * meta-lat layer is not in the StartlingX repo, but its in github repo. fork it.. do a pull request to github lab for any changes. * meta-lat used is with the WR's repo, not community one. Will migrate later. * Naming * How to moderate source code, add the machine-type = aarch 64/arm, add another name for UIO for ARM. * Package name: Jackie is changing the naming mechanism from x86_64 to arm64. Use hard coded name. * AI: Send a couple package's name for code review. * Branch Name: the branching name. How to build ARM branch in addition to X86_64. [Meeting ended here due to time constraints] * 'Build server stats' email, Scott replied to the email on the mailing list: * Build server recommendation: At least 4 disks, and 12 T storage space, 128 G memory. possible ram disk for builds * AI#5 Test server config: Scott will check with QA team to provide needed info. 3.0 StartlingX 8.0 * SPEC from Chuck on OSTree generation on the controller, pending review. * Work is being done, but the SPEC will need to be rewritten. Deferred. Next Meeting: Aug 9th, 2023 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Linda.Wang at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 03:52:47 2023 From: Linda.Wang at windriver.com (Wang, Linda) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 03:52:47 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Bi-Weekly StartlingX OS Distro & Multi-OS Meeting: Aug 9, 2023 Message-ID: Aug 9, 2023 Attendees: Jackie Huang, Tianyu Li, Charles, Mark, Scott, Davlet, Juanita 1. General Topics * 1.1 Split package list between repositories (ISO and container images) * Separation of the list is done per Davlet. * AI: Devlet will check the documentation on package list. * 1.2 Log into the git before download the source. * How to pass the credential through the tooling layer when log into git repo. * workaround: currently use repo sync outside of the containers. * AI: Scott to write up a feature request for the tool - file a request in Story Board. * Created: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010777 * 1.3 Pre-patch ISO (Luis Sampaio is back, will ping him to join us next time) * ARM Support * CENGN move is done. Got a build done it is working. * a. Equipment * Ampere provided 6 servers * Still waiting on exact location where the servers should be sent from Steve G. of the CTO office * 6 Ampere servers will go to where the CENGN lab is going to be. 2 for build, 4 for testing. * Can the community support the lab? * AI: ARM is still waiting on a location to host these servers. AI: Steve is help looking for a location to host these servers. * AI: who from the community can help setup these servers? and support the CI/CD on ARM platform * b. CI/CD Setup (Jackie) * Who can help explain the CI/CD method to Jackie, Tiayu. * A lot of left over work with CNGN transition. Scott/Davlet can help answer some of the quetions. * CI/CD is not very well documented. * c. Porting still in progreess (Jakie) * rewrote the coding to support build system for both x86 and arm * build system will detect the arch, and if it is arm, it will build arm arch. * Wrote up the SPEC on the implementtaion., and now waiting on SPEC to be review * SPEC review first then will send code for code review. * Some kernel modules don't work * QEMU is not working yet. Waiting on kernel up-rev, then and see if QEMU can be fixed then. * Created 2 wikipages for setting up the build environment for ARM arch: * https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/StarlingX_Debian_on_ARM_Information_Guide * https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/DebianArmBuildEnvironment * d. Packages for x86_64 are in CNGN, need to push ARM packages there. * hopefully within a week, the packages can be pushed to CNGN. Hopefully next week sometime when the CNGN moved finish. * Secureboot is disabled for now. Will do it in the future. * ELF SDK is used to build image. Need to push the SDK to CNGN, no permission to push to CNGN yet, it is on local disk. * Need to change meta-lat layer for ELF SDK, but want to link the task to different repo, but can't. * meta-lat layer is not in the StartlingX repo, but its in github repo. fork it.. do a pull request to github lab for any changes. * meta-lat used is with the WR's repo, not community one. Will migrate later. * e. Naming * package names, and Branch Names, resolved. are all in the SPEC> * f. Build server configurations resolved. Amper and ARM have the configuration setup. * 3.0 StartlingX 8.0 * SPEC from Chuck on OSTree generation on the controller, pending review. * Work is being done, but the SPEC will need to be rewritten. Deferred. Next Meeting: Aug 25, 2023 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 12:24:06 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:24:06 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Agree with Thales in that openstack testing in DC Environment has been limited lately. In previous releases of STX, openstack has been tested on DC Subclouds. openstack is NOT supported on the central cloud (SystemController) ... believe there really just hasn't been a requirement for this, so not tested or supported. Greg. From: Cervi, Thales Elero Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 3:02 PM To: Ildiko Vancsa Cc: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions Hi Ildiko, Unfortunately, I am not the best person to talk about a Distributed Cloud deployment, don't have much experience with such installation. I will add this to my list to directly ping Greg once he is back from his vacation and we can elaborate on this topic for you and for the community. How does it sound? Thanks, Thales ________________________________ From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 12:24 AM To: Cervi, Thales Elero > Cc: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Thales, Thank you for sharing further information. I have a quick question below. Thanks, Ildik? --- Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 9, 2023, at 05:14, Cervi, Thales Elero > wrote: > > Hi Ildiko, > > I might be able to help with the last question: > > 4. Is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. > > I am pretty sure this is not being tested recently, so we should definitely revisit it and re-test if the community finds it important. > What I know from the past is that the stx-openstack application SHOULD BE supported on subclouds and SHOULD NOT BE supported on central (system controller) clouds. [Ildiko] This reads a little confusing to me. What does it mean that stx-openstack should not be supported on central clouds? Does that mean that the central cloud is not expected to run workloads? As OpenStack is a cloud platform that powers large data centers, I can see how it might not be implemented to run in sub-clouds, but rather in the central data center. +1 for more targeted testing in this area. > If we feel like revisiting this deployment, we can arrange it as part of stx.10 maybe? Do you mean the central cloud or the sub-cloud deployment? > [...] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 12:24:46 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:24:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Can you respond to the subcloud questions below ? thanks, Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 6:15 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I got the below questions about StarlingX, and need a little help with finding the answers: 1. Can a subcloud-group be rehomed (can see that a subcloud can, but what about a subcloud-group)? 2. Can a subcloud belong to multiple subcloud groups for administrative and monitoring/reporting purposes? - For example, having all subclouds in a given region with the same update/version policies, and at the same time having all instances running a particular application to have specific settings for that application regardless of region setting? 3. Is it possible to provision a specific application to an entire subcloud-group in a single action? 4. Last one - is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. Thank you for your help in advance. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 12:46:19 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:46:19 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions In-Reply-To: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> References: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: See in-lined comments/responses below, Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 6:06 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to share some information with you from a call I had with a potential new user. * Industry area, use cases and requirements - The company is in the telecom industry, the person I talked to has been in the area of research - StarlingX use cases + Primarily private wireless and 5G core + Later on potential use cases might include AI, healthcare and more - They are currently prioritizing containerized workloads and later on will be looking into deploying OpenStack as well * Evaluation status - Early stages, they deployed StarlingX, both simplex and duplex, in virtual environments - Looking into bare metal deployment as well * Feedback and questions so far - As they have been looking into the platform, they didn?t seem to be able to find the level of multi-tenancy that they needed + Does the platform support multiple tenants within one Kubernetes cluster and one StarlingX instance? Is there any documentation that describes the available tenant and user configurations within StarlingX? [Greg] In the context of StarlingX infrastructure management, there is absolutely no multiple tenant support. There is one, and only one, tenant that manages the hosts and the services that make up the StarlingX Bare Metal Infrastructure Management. In the context of the StarlingX Kubernetes cluster, ? sort of, but nothing more than vanilla K8S gives you ? ? there is some documentation on how you can manage non-admin type k8s users, and groups of k8s users, in different namespaces, with restricted RBAC, restricted security policies and restricted resource management, etc. ( https://docs.starlingx.io/security/kubernetes/index-security-kub-81153c1254c3.html#manage-non-admin-type-users ) o ? all using common K8S mechanisms ? ? sort of a very soft multi-tenancy ? ? but we have not done anything else o areas that we would LIKE to look into for kubernetes multi-tenancy is to basically look at the projects under the Kubernetes Working Group for Multi-Tenancy ( https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/ ), e.g. ? Benchmarks: a set of benchmarks (i.e., compliance tests) to determine if your clusters are well-configured for multitenancy. ? Hierararchical namespaces (aka HNC): allows namespaces to own each other, policy propagation between related namespaces, and delegated namespace creation. ? Virtual clusters: run multiple virtualized cluster on a single underlying cluster, allowing for hard(er) multitenancy. - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. [Greg] Would be interesting to have a discussion with them to understand their difficulty in understanding the platform networks. I.e. I?m assuming it is the ?platform? networks that they are having trouble understanding ? i.e. https://docs.starlingx.io/_images/starlingx-deployment-options-controller-storage.png - They had an intern who was working on deploying the platform and has been using the community?s communication channels, including IRC. The intern had a hard time getting responses to their questions, which made it harder to figure out how to overcome the deployment challenges. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 12:49:02 2023 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:49:02 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity and Regression - StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build [20230820T060000Z] results - Aug - 20 Message-ID: Hi all, StarlingX + STX-Openstack sanity and regression results: Overall Status: Yellow Build Info: Build date: Aug 20 - 20230820T060000Z ISO: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230820T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Helm Chart: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230820T060000Z/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-1.stx.68-debian-stable-versioned.tgz AIO-DX Baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=OVS Sanity Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 13 (86.67%) Failed: 2 (13.33%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS??20230821 17:31:35?test_ssh_to_hosts PASS??20230821 17:32:58?test_lock_unlock_host PASS??20230821 17:50:28?test_openstack_services_healthy PASS??20230821 17:51:33?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS??20230821 17:53:36?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS??20230821 18:02:47?test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS??20230821 18:02:59?test_swact_controllers PASS??20230821 18:11:13?test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] FAIL??20230821 18:17:33?test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS??20230821 18:25:00?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS??20230821 18:29:24?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL??20230821 18:33:41?test_evacuate_vms PASS??20230821 19:09:21?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS??20230821 19:09:38?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS??20230821 19:09:45?test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- test_evacuate_vms failed due to #2030883 - STX Debian: DX VM evacuation failed after reboot active controller . test_migrate_vm failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration Regression Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 9 (75.0%) Failed: 3 (25.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20230821 19:16:18 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20230821 19:17:44 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20230821 19:18:45 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20230821 19:23:20 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] FAIL 20230821 19:43:19 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20230821 19:54:44 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20230821 19:57:37 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20230821 20:03:15 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20230821 20:10:22 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20230821 20:15:48 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20230821 20:22:15 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20230821 20:46:58 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- test_cpu_pol_vm_actions failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration , test_lock_with_vms and test_vm_with_config_drive failed due to :#2030889 - STX | DX Controller-1 is not in locked state Thanks, STX-Openstack Distro Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 12:58:27 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:58:27 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Upcoming virtual PTG in October - time slots In-Reply-To: <0025B599-4516-4AC4-AF09-4CFEC7ED4FCD@openinfra.dev> References: <0025B599-4516-4AC4-AF09-4CFEC7ED4FCD@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: I am good with your suggested timeslots. Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, August 9, 2023 1:07 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Upcoming virtual PTG in October - time slots CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, As you might?ve seen the next virtual Project Teams Gathering (PTG)[1] event is scheduled for October 23-27, 2023. I signed up StarlingX to participate, and also created an etherpad to start planning: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-ptg-planning-october-2023 Traditionally the community has been choosing time slots on the second and third days of the event. To follow the usual schedule, the time slots for the October event would be the following: * Tuesday (October 24) at 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC * Wednesday (October 25) at 1300 UTC - 1700 UTC Would the above time slots work for the community for the upcoming event? Also, please register[2] for the event if you are planning to attend. Registration is free, and it will ensure that you get all the event related communications to be up to date about how to join the sessions and participate. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? [1] https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ [2] https://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/?_ga=2.118740617.1815757535.1691527932-1627391255.1690284879 ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Tee.Ngo at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 13:56:46 2023 From: Tee.Ngo at windriver.com (Ngo, Tee) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 13:56:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry I missed the original email. Please see responses inline. Tee -----Original Message----- From: Waines, Greg Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 8:25 AM To: Ngo, Tee Cc: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions Can you respond to the subcloud questions below ? thanks, Greg. -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 6:15 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I got the below questions about StarlingX, and need a little help with finding the answers: 1. Can a subcloud-group be rehomed (can see that a subcloud can, but what about a subcloud-group)? [TN] No as the parameters required for rehoming are specific to each subcloud. Having said that, development has started for Geo redundancy capability which will enable subclouds that are registered with system peers to be re-homed as a group (subcloud-peer-group). 2. Can a subcloud belong to multiple subcloud groups for administrative and monitoring/reporting purposes? - For example, having all subclouds in a given region with the same update/version policies, and at the same time having all instances running a particular application to have specific settings for that application regardless of region setting? [TN] From DC management perspective, subcloud group was designed for the purpose of orchestrated operation planning/scheduling/execution. For instance, subclouds belonging to a particular group can be patched/upgraded separately from other subclouds in the same DC in order to run a particular version of the custom app(s). There isn't a means to establish a relation between subcloud group and custom applications otherwise. 3. Is it possible to provision a specific application to an entire subcloud-group in a single action? [TN] There isn't a dcmanager/system command for this. One would need to write a small script for this custom provisioning. 4. Last one - is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. [TN] As OpenStack can run in a StarlingX standalone system, it should run in a subcloud as well. However, there were some issues with OpenStack on StarlingX since the switch to Debian which only got resolved since June this year. There is no support of OpenStack in the system controller. The system controller was designed to monitor and manage the subclouds. It's not meant to run custom apps/workloads that are not for these purposes. Keep in mind that StarlingX subcloud can be a simplex or multi-node with many workers and storage. Thank you for your help in advance. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 14:29:16 2023 From: Ramaswamy.Subramanian at windriver.com (Subramanian, Ramaswamy) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:29:16 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DistCloud/Flock Services Project Meeting Minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: August 22, 2023: * StarlingX 9.0 Release: * Feature development in progress. More details are available in the release planning spread sheet. * Stale Code Review Cleanup to keep the review queue sane (more than 1 year old with no activity) * https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/838703 * Bug cleanup (more than 1 year old with no activity) * Closed. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1912421 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1883201 * Candidate for Closure. * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1918722 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2026759 * https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2018409 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Suhailath.Valavil at windriver.com Tue Aug 22 15:34:09 2023 From: Suhailath.Valavil at windriver.com (Valavil, Suhailath) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:34:09 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20230820T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2023 August 21 (https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230820T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] DX sanity Passed: 19 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 19 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_swact_controller_platform PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_standby PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_1p_1pod_AIO PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-True] PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-False] PASS test_force_reboot_host[standby_controller-False] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 22 18:40:57 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:40:57 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8EF80C52-C9E1-4773-84B1-9A36C11255EA@openinfra.dev> Great, thank you for the clarifications. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 22, 2023, at 06:56, Ngo, Tee wrote: > > Sorry I missed the original email. Please see responses inline. > > Tee > > -----Original Message----- > From: Waines, Greg > Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2023 8:25 AM > To: Ngo, Tee > Cc: Ildiko Vancsa ; StarlingX ML > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions > > Can you respond to the subcloud questions below ? > thanks, > Greg. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2023 6:15 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User questions > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I got the below questions about StarlingX, and need a little help with finding the answers: > > 1. Can a subcloud-group be rehomed (can see that a subcloud can, but what about a subcloud-group)? > [TN] No as the parameters required for rehoming are specific to each subcloud. Having said that, development has started for Geo redundancy capability which will enable subclouds that are registered with system peers to be re-homed as a group (subcloud-peer-group). > > 2. Can a subcloud belong to multiple subcloud groups for administrative and monitoring/reporting purposes? > - For example, having all subclouds in a given region with the same update/version policies, and at the same time having all instances running a particular application to have specific settings for that application regardless of region setting? > [TN] From DC management perspective, subcloud group was designed for the purpose of orchestrated operation planning/scheduling/execution. For instance, subclouds belonging to a particular group can be patched/upgraded separately from other subclouds in the same DC in order to run a particular version of the custom app(s). There isn't a means to establish a relation between subcloud group and custom applications otherwise. > > 3. Is it possible to provision a specific application to an entire subcloud-group in a single action? > [TN] There isn't a dcmanager/system command for this. One would need to write a small script for this custom provisioning. > > 4. Last one - is it possible to run OpenStack in subclouds? Most of the documentation only seems to mention K8s. > [TN] As OpenStack can run in a StarlingX standalone system, it should run in a subcloud as well. However, there were some issues with OpenStack on StarlingX since the switch to Debian which only got resolved since June this year. > There is no support of OpenStack in the system controller. The system controller was designed to monitor and manage the subclouds. It's not meant to run custom apps/workloads that are not for these purposes. Keep in mind that StarlingX subcloud can be a simplex or multi-node with many workers and storage. > > Thank you for your help in advance. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 22 18:59:57 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:59:57 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] User feedback and questions In-Reply-To: References: <4A7441AD-CADD-4691-A40B-8E2B8281FA22@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <109C4918-4B20-41A9-B36D-8F629CC116F7@openinfra.dev> Hi Greg, Thank you for the clarifications. Please see a few more notes in line. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > [?] > > * Feedback and questions so far > - As they have been looking into the platform, they didn?t seem to be able to find the level of multi-tenancy that they needed > + Does the platform support multiple tenants within one Kubernetes cluster and one StarlingX instance? Is there any documentation that describes the available tenant and user configurations within StarlingX? > [Greg] > In the context of StarlingX infrastructure management, there is absolutely no multiple tenant support. > There is one, and only one, tenant that manages the hosts and the services that make up the StarlingX Bare Metal Infrastructure Management. > > In the context of the StarlingX Kubernetes cluster, ? sort of, but nothing more than vanilla K8S gives you ? > ? there is some documentation on how you can manage non-admin type k8s users, and groups of k8s users, in different namespaces, with restricted RBAC, restricted security policies and restricted resource management, etc. ( https://docs.starlingx.io/security/kubernetes/index-security-kub-81153c1254c3.html#manage-non-admin-type-users ) > ? ? all using common K8S mechanisms > ? ? sort of a very soft multi-tenancy > ? ? but we have not done anything else > ? areas that we would LIKE to look into for kubernetes multi-tenancy is to basically look at the projects under the Kubernetes Working Group for Multi-Tenancy ( https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/multi-tenancy/ ), e.g. > ? Benchmarks: a set of benchmarks (i.e., compliance tests) to determine if your clusters are well-configured for multitenancy. > ? Hierararchical namespaces (aka HNC): allows namespaces to own each other, policy propagation between related namespaces, and delegated namespace creation. > ? Virtual clusters: run multiple virtualized cluster on a single underlying cluster, allowing for hard(er) multitenancy. [Ildiko] I understand the infrastructure management constraints. When it comes to Kubernetes, is there a way to utilize the multi-tenancy concept from OpenStack, without running the Kubernetes pieces and containers in virtual machines? > - The networking setup has been hard to figure out for StarlingX, they found that it's not very well documented. > + Is it in the roadmap to document the networking setup for StarlingX with more details? > + Would it be possible to automate the creation of networks for the platform? Especially for the virtual deployment option, since that is most commonly deployed by new users, who are evaluating the platform. > [Greg] > Would be interesting to have a discussion with them to understand their difficulty in understanding the platform networks. > I.e. I?m assuming it is the ?platform? networks that they are having trouble understanding ? i.e. https://docs.starlingx.io/_images/starlingx-deployment-options-controller-storage.png [Ildiko] We haven?t gone into deep details on this topic. They also had an intern working on setting StarlingX up, who might?v had less overall experience in networking that could?ve contributed to some of the challenges. Networking related questions are common on IRC too, so it is definitely an area that can benefit from more examples for people who are less experienced. > [?] From kennelson11 at gmail.com Tue Aug 22 21:39:18 2023 From: kennelson11 at gmail.com (Kendall Nelson) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 16:39:18 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Fwd: vPTG October 2023 Teams List In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello Everyone! The October 2023 Project Teams List is official! Projects + Teams - OpenInfra Foundation Teams - - Diversity & Inclusion Working Group - OpenInfra Edge Computing Group - Environmental Sustainability Working Group - StarlingX - OpenStack - - Services - - Blazar - Cinder - CloudKitty - Designate - Glance - Horizon - Ironic - Kolla - Manila - Neutron - Nova - Octavia - OpenStack Charms - OpenStack-Helm - Quality Assurance - OpenStackSDK/CLI - Swift - Tacker - Other OpenStack Teams - - Interoperability Working Group - OpenStack Security SIG - PublicCloud SIG If your team was planning to meet and isn?t on this list, please contact ptg at openinfra.dev IMMEDIATELY. Soon I will be contacting moderators to sign up for time via the PTGBot[1] once I have it configured for the teams that are signed up to attend the event. Otherwise, please don't forget to register[2] ? It's FREE! As usual, feel free to let us know if you have any questions! Thanks! -Kendall (diablo_rojo) [1] PTGBot Docs: https://github.com/openstack/ptgbot#open-infrastructure-ptg-bot [2] PTG Registration: http://ptg2023.openinfra.dev/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Wed Aug 23 15:22:29 2023 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 15:22:29 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Test Status Call - Aug 22, 2023 Message-ID: Hi everyone, Please find below the minutes from this week's StarlingX Test Status Call: Minutes for 08/22/2023 * Open Topics: * Concerns around ability to perform STX9.0 release regression within current release schedule - resourcing problem * This item will be discussed in the TSC call * Sanity Status: o Sanity on STX 9.0 - Green for SX and DX ? Last execution, August 21, 2023 - Results email:https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014451.html * Sanity on STX 9.0 plus Openstack: ? Last execution, Aug 22, 2023 - Yellow - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014447.html * Launchpads opened to track failures o test_evacuate_vms failed due to #2030883 - STX Debian: DX VM evacuation failed after reboot active controller - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2030883 * test_migrate_vm failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2030888 * Feature Test Status: o Feature testing is tracked in the following google sheet: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1El3g0ute5K2S5DTR9p_rxa1jQlq8gcUzgMCNCE_sx8g/edit#gid=968103774 ? Some features are in progress, sheet does need updating ACTION: Rob/Nimalini * Regression Testing will be tracked here closer to release end: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NjYk9N0whK91nHViB5HFG2C1-XdJ09StVuLMxsz0KAY/edit?pli=1#gid=1717644237 Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kristin at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 23 17:20:50 2023 From: kristin at openinfra.dev (Kristin Barrientos) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2023 12:20:50 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Cyber Resilience Act: What Now? Aug 24 at 9 AM (CST) / 14:00 UTC Message-ID: Hi everyone, This week?s OpenInfra Live episode is brought to you by open source community leaders. Episode: On this episode of OpenInfra Live, we will discuss the EU Cyber Resilience Act's impact on open source software. The OpenInfra Foundation and many other open source organizations have expressed concerns about the proposed text, urging the European lawmakers to take into account the specificity of open source open collaboration in the legislation. Join and engage live with our expert panelists as they discuss the current state of the proposal, its potential consequences, what we can still do about it, and what other pieces of upcoming legislation we should watch for. Date and time: Aug 24, 2023 at 9:00 AM CST (14:00 UTC) You can watch us live on: YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6Dh0nXivqM LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/events/7095407763538763776/comments/ WeChat: The recording will be posted on OpenInfra Foundation WeChat after the live stream Speakers: Thierry Carrez, Allison Randal, Mike Milinkovich, Ciar?n O'Riordan Have an idea for a future episode? Share it now at ideas.openinfra.live. Thanks, Kristin Barrientos Marketing Coordinator OpenInfra Foundation -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Jackie.Huang at windriver.com Thu Aug 24 12:57:36 2023 From: Jackie.Huang at windriver.com (Huang, Jie (Jackie)) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:57:36 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> Message-ID: Hi Scott / Davlet, As we discussed on the OS Distro call, a local CENGEN like server is needed for the local CI/CD setup, Could you please share the info of how to setup a CENGEN like server, specifically how to prepare the package mirror, we need to get it setup and prepare the mirror for ARM deb packages, and for the LAT-SDK for ARM as well. Thanks! Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 1:33 PM To: Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet ; Tianyu Li Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott, Thanks for sharing, it?s very helpful. Thanks, Jackie From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:48 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Wang, Linda > Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform There is also ... https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins Which contains the current state of the StarlingX jenkins setup, less a few credentials. It includes 'Debian_build_server.txt' with crude documentation of how the server was setup. Scott On 2023-08-16 21:04, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: Hi Davlet, Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu and I will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are any more questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Panech, Davlet Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, Linda Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Jackie, CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current build set up is outlined below. You would need a dedicated server: 1. Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since most build steps run in docker containers 2. Docker 3. Kubernetes 4. Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines 5. git 6. git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo Other prerequisites: 1. You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate limits when pulling images 2. Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. 1. The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared functions under vars/ . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. 2. pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ 3. pipelines/parts/ : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo 4. scripts/ : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by Jenkinsfiles) Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas 2. /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to copy & edit: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping me if you have any more questions. Hope this helps, D. ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Sent: August 9, 2023 10:28 AM To: Little, Scott >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li >; Wang, Linda > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Little, Scott >; Scott Kamp > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support ? Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines ? Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions ? Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN ? Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 24 13:56:23 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:56:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Feedback Requested: stx.9.0 feature content Message-ID: Hello community members, The stx release team has recently compiled an updated list of features that are on track for inclusion in the stx.9.0 release. Based on feedback from various feature primes, a number of features which were initially targeted for stx.9.0 will not be ready in time. Please review the list below and respond if you have any concerns about the current content. Thanks, Ghada == - Features that are IN stx.9.0: 24 - Armada Deprecation / Replacement - FluxCD (cont'd) - K8S Upversion Duration Reduction for AIO-SX - Upversion Helm (v3.9.4) - Upversion FluxCD - Containerization Component Refresh - k8s 1.25 / 1.26 - Support for Silicom TimeSync Server Adaptor - Platform Admin Network Introduction - L3 Firewalls for all Platform Interfaces - Platform Application Upversion - FEC Operator 2.6.1 - Platform Application Upversion - FEC Operator 2.7.1 & pf-bb-config - Platform Application Upversion - Istio - Redundant / HA PTP timing clock sources - Intel Ethernet Operator StarlingX Integration - AppArmor Support - Platform Application Upversion - Vault - Platform Application Upversion - Portieris - Platform Application Upversion - oidc - Platform Application Upversion - ingress-nginx - Platform Application Upversion - cert-manager - PSP Removal in support of transition to k8s 1.25/1.26 - WAD Users sudo and local linux group assignment - Subcloud Error Root Cause Correction Action - Containerize OpenStack application clients - Configurable Power Manager - Features that are OUT of stx.9.0: 16 - K8S Control Plane Scalability - Kata Container Runtime support (fix) in Debian - remove Armada - Securing/Encrypting local traffic on Platform L2 Networks - QAT/GPU Device Plugin Refresh - Link Bonding for SR-IOV PF interfaces - Platform Management Network Reconfiguration for AIO-SX - K8s API CLI oidc auth with local LDAP backend - Internal Management of ETCD Certificates - Full Disk Encryption Support via SDEs - Support for long latency between SystemController and Subclouds - Subcloud Install or Restore of Previous Release - Harbor Registry Integration in StarlingX - code merged, but no resources to test - Marvell Octeon NIC Accelerator Integration - StarlingX Container Image Updates for CVE fixes - Features that are TBD: 1 - Openstack services upversion: Ussuri -> Antelope << handled as a separate item due to visibility From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Thu Aug 24 13:32:24 2023 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 13:32:24 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX9.0 release regression and system test Message-ID: Hi everyone, As discussed in the TSC call this week, there is a concern that the STX test team does not have the bandwidth to perform release regression and system testing activities within the current STX9.0 release timeframe. There were a couple of options that were discussed in the call: 1. Release STX9.0 as a "tech preview" which would mean release with limited to no release regression or system testing having been performed 2. Have other volunteers within the community take on the responsibility of performing the release regression and system test activities 3. Push the STX9.0 dates back into Q1 2024 when test team resources free up to perform the planned regression and system test We are looking for community feedback on either of those options, so if you have opinions or have resources who can perform the activities, please reply to this email and we'll engage on the conversation. Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruce.Jones at windriver.com Thu Aug 24 16:26:30 2023 From: Bruce.Jones at windriver.com (Jones, Bruce) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:26:30 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Restarting bi-weekly Container-Infra call Message-ID: We are re-starting the bi-weekly container-infra call. The first call will be Tuesday August 29th at 6:30AM Pacific time. Call in links and meeting agenda/notes can be found here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings#6:30am_Pacific_-_StarlingX_Infrastructure_Containerization_sub-project_bi-weekly_call brucej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com Thu Aug 24 20:58:42 2023 From: Ghada.Khalil at windriver.com (Khalil, Ghada) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 20:58:42 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Community Call (Aug 23, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status Minutes from the community call Aug 23, 2023 Standing topics - Build - Main Branch Debian Builds - Green - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/ - Antelope Feature Branch Debian Builds - Green - stx.6.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/6.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.6.0 - stx.7.0 Weekly RC Builds - Failed with the same error as last week; failed due to disk space error; even though there should be enough - Need to investigate more. Will attempt to shift the build schedule to avoid concurrent builds to see if this resolves the issue - Build Output: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/ - Note: No container image builds are done for stx.7.0 - stx.8.0 Weekly RC Builds - Green - Build Output: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/8.0/ - Note: The same issue of not publishing images (as in the main branch) exists for stx.8.0 and will be resolved in the next build. - Sanity - Debian Main Branch Platform Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 22: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014451.html - Status: Green for SX and DX - Debian Main Branch stx-openstack Sanity - Last sanity email sent on Aug 29: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014447.html - Status: Yellow (issue which caused a red sanity last week was resolved) - Two New LPs - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2030883 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/2030888 - Team is currently focusing on Antelope, so it will take a while to investigate. Will also monitor if the issues are reproduced in the upcoming sanity runs. - Gerrit Reviews in Need of Attention - ARM Spec Review - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/specs/+/890514 - No progress in terms of review since last week. - ScottL and Greg are planning to review this week. It was also suggested that MarkA and Yue Tao (OS team) to review - Memory Utilization Documentation - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/890816/4/doc/source/deploy_install_guides/release/bare_metal/aio_duplex_install_kubernetes.rst#290 - Looking for input from the community on what to recommend in terms of memory usage. - ChrisF provided some input on the call; suggesting that the default values may need to be discussed instead of suggesting that each user has to change the defaults - The values maybe dependent on the config used (ex: deploying stx-openstack app) - Reference Links: - Active Branch (open): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:open+branch:+master - Active Branch (merged): https://review.opendev.org/q/projects:starlingx+is:merged+branch:master Topics for this week - stx.9.0 Release Status - Ghada Khalil - Discussed in the TSC portion - See: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores - Milestone-3 will not be declard today. - Action: Ghada to send a summary of the feature cotent to the mailing list and get feedback - Email sent: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014458.html / waiting for feedback until next week - October PTG (virtual) - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014454.html - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014448.html - Time slots have been proposed on the mailing list. - Container Lights-On Activities - The container team has a number of lights-on activity every release - like upgrading to new version of k8s. - Is a spec needed for that type of work? - Greg suggested to have one high-level spec every stx release to summarize the planned upversioning work - including k8s, CNIs, applications, kernel, etc. - Agreed to have a spec starting in stx.10.0 ARs from Previous Meetings - ARM Enablement - Jackie Huang - The ARM team is providing 6 servers to the StarlingX community, but there is no place to host them. - The ARM team is not able to host them directly for public community access - Steve Geary has been trying to find space to host these machines, but not much traction to date over many weeks - Need a forum to escalate this issue. Agreed to start with the TSC and go from there - Action: SteveG/Jackie to raise this issue w/ the TSC on Aug 23. - Status: Open. Not discussed in the TSC on Aug 23 / SteveG on vacation; added to TSC agenda for Aug 30. - The ARM team also have questions about how to setup a CI/CD on those machines - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014396.html - Action: Davlet to reply to the email with some initial responses - Status: In progress. Under discussion on the mailing list - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014409.html - dockerhub changed StarlingX from free-team to team - Scott Little - This was done automatically by dockerhub. Not clear what the reason is. - The cost is $300/year. Mike Matteson was following up - Action: Scott to connect Ildiko with Mike - Status: In progress. Ildiko is talking to dockerhub people. Mike will sync up with Ildiko. Deadline for payment is Aug 24. - Action: Ildiko to raise the topic of looking for alternatives to dockerhub with the TSC. Ultimately, this will become a community resoucing discussion - Status: Open. Not discussed in the TSC on Aug 23; added to TSC agenda for Aug 30. - Looking for community members to participate in US gov security initiative - Manju Rupani - Suggested to introduce the topic on the mailing list and see if there is any interest - Action: Manju to send to the mailing list. - Status: Open. Not sent yet - Renaming App Repos to remove "armada" from the name - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-June/014215.html - Minor / cosmetic change. Lower priority, but would be nice to do. Should have no impact on runtime. - Work required by Build team and Container/Apps team. - Action: Joshua Reed to create a story board to track this work. - Update: 8/16/23 - Storyboard link: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010560 - Status: Closed. Build and Container/Apps team to work together to determine the timeline/resourcing for this item Open Requests for Help not discussed this week - User Questions - sent by Ildiko - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014391.html - Responses are coming in on the mailing list - Issues raised are related to networking setup. - Bruno/team provided an automated script for virtual installation (vbox) which should handle the networking setup. - As per Bruno, there are some vbox bugs which could be impacting users. Bruno will sent info on these unresolved issues. - Status: Open - Bruno responded with suggestions to the mailing list, but haven't received further feedback - Not able to use NVIDIA drivers with StarlingX vbox installation - raised in the meeting by Manju Rupani - NVIDIA drivers should not be required to successfully setup StarlingX vbox installation, so the suggestion is to try w/o them first. - Status: Open - Still no success; looking for an alternative machine to setup the vbox installation - Help w/ Install - Two people asking for help with installation on IRC - Bruno is trying to help them, but it appears that they are in a different timezone. If others can participate, it would be great. - Status: Open - Discussion is continuing between Bruno and others on IRC. This is related to the "User Questions" topic above. - The questions are a mix of how to setup a virtual env as well the installation itself - For virtual env, there are two options currently: vbox & libvirt/kvm - Note: There is recent effort to get libvirt/kvm working. Email reference: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-July/014267.html From ildiko at openinfra.dev Fri Aug 25 04:34:14 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 21:34:14 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Docker org owner Message-ID: <30E5198F-4CB8-4F4F-ADDD-4EBF9E4FE424@openinfra.dev> Hi, I?m reaching out to you about the Docker OSS program that StarlingX is part of. After I reached to them asking about the issue the build team has been facing, they sent a separate email that warns about StarlingX?s membership to the Docker-Sponsored Open Source Program is set to expire. I started to fill out the application form to renew, but it is asking for a user Docker ID< that is the owner of the StarlingX organization. I logged in and it doesn?t seem that my user is an owner. Does anyone know if it is possible to add my user to the owner group? My user ID is ildikov. Or alternatively, who is the owner of the StarlingX org? Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com Fri Aug 25 22:01:59 2023 From: Juanita.Balaraj at windriver.com (Balaraj, Juanita) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 22:01:59 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [docs] [meeting] Docs team notes 25-08-2023 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Here are this week's doc team meeting minutes. Details in [2]. Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet on Fridays 6:00 a.m. PST. [1] Call logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings [2] Tracking Etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Thanks, Juanita Balaraj ============ 25-August-23 Action Items / Status: - Stx 9.0 Release Tracking Spreadsheet: Doc Stories are tracked in https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit?usp=sharing. - To add stories that are planned for Stx 9.0 - AR Juanita - WIP (add / replan as required). Features have been removed from Stx 9.0. See https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores for more details. - Discussion about Merging the Installation Guides ; Virtual env with the Bare metal docs. WIP - https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/876107 - AR Juanita to talk to Greg - Split the docs and retain them as separate guides at a high level. Resue content from Bare Metal in the Virtual env docs. - Discussion about the tox version : https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/890833 - AR Ron / Bruno (Allow list to be reviewed) - AR Bruno / Ron - Documentation Contributor Guide - StarlingX documentation - https://docs.starlingx.io/contributor/doc_contribute_guide.html - All to update the Contributor guide on an ongoing basis for new Styles / Standards implemented - The team to familiarize themselves with the Styles and Standards Guide. Gerrit reviews: - Open Reviews pending; https://review.opendev.org/q/starlingx/docs+status:open - Merged 2 Reviews. To get closure of the open reviews at the earliest. Launchpad Doc Bugs: - https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.docs Total 10 outstanding bugs. - Closed 2 LP bugs. Miscellaneous Updates: Stx. Virtual PTG Meeting: https://openinfra.dev/ptg/ - Stx Doc team is encouraged to participate in sessions as required. - Ron to update the Verified H/W page with the automated script updates https://www.windriver.com/studio/operator/self-validated-and-certified-hosts# - Currently Commented out - Script needs to be updated- Waiting for updates to the script -AR Ron - WIP - Bruno Muniz showed interest in creating DOC Videos supporting the StarlingX Installation Process. To check with Ildiko / Greg whether this is ok. These Videos can be hosted in a location in StarlingX. The Installation Docs can point to these videos - AR Bruno to get approvals from Ildiko / Greg for a future Update - Sphinx Tools - Need to have further discussions about the version used upstream vs. downstream - AR Ron -To determine version. - Docker Container upstream / downstream - AR Ron (Discuss it with Greg / Ildiko) - a long term project - Pending - Operations Guide Archive - On Hold until further clarifications are discussed with Greg (https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/822030) Engineering Status: StarlingX Eng Stx Status: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-status StarlingX Eng Status 2023 https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-cores StarlingX OS Status: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-distro-other ____________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Fri Aug 25 22:16:50 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2023 15:16:50 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX is certified as a Kubernetes v1.26 conformant platform Message-ID: <61730432-8A89-457E-B9DC-375E02079BE1@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, I?m reaching out to you with some exciting news! The StarlingX Test team executed the Kubernetes conformance test suit on a snapshot of StarlingX 9.0 with success. After submitting the test results and re-submitting the application form, the PR to add StarlingX as a certified platform is now accepted and merged! You can find the PR here: https://github.com/cncf/k8s-conformance/pull/2731 Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From manjrupani at gmail.com Mon Aug 28 17:15:22 2023 From: manjrupani at gmail.com (Manju Rupani) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:15:22 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Security Initiatives Message-ID: Hello all, I was wondering if there is interest in collaborating on security initiatives. Thanks, Manju Rupani 6304455096 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruce.Jones at windriver.com Tue Aug 29 13:46:31 2023 From: Bruce.Jones at windriver.com (Jones, Bruce) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:46:31 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Container sub-project meeting Aug 29 2023 Message-ID: We held the first of the restarted Container sub-project calls today. Here are the notes. The next call will be in two weeks. brucej Agenda & Notes for August 29th 2023 Meeting * Introductions * StarlingX 9.0 features and plans o https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aTjYzUkExodfayt-rjTv466jE-DP8b_YjrTHhXW6G9w/edit#gid=1107209846 o Feature list & status: ? Armada Deprecation / Replacement - FluxCD (cont'd) * Story: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010560 ? K8S Upversion Duration Reduction for AIO-SX ? K8S Control Plane Scalability - OUT ? Kata Container Runtime support (fix) in Debian - OUT but code available for review ? Upversion Helm (v3.9.4) ? Upversion FluxCD ? remove Armada - Partially complete ? Containerization Component Refresh - k8s 1.25 / 1.26 * STX 10.0 feature candidates o K8S Up-version duration reduction for multi-node o Kubevirt validation and fixes o Helm, FluxCD and K8s upversions o Kata containers for Debian * Joshua is working on running sysinv service as a stand-alone program - ease of debugging and testing * We have our own Matrix channel "StarlingX Containers" - please use it :) * Requests for help? o None today -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Suhailath.Valavil at windriver.com Tue Aug 29 16:58:54 2023 From: Suhailath.Valavil at windriver.com (Valavil, Suhailath) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 16:58:54 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20230828T060000Z Message-ID: Sanity Test from 2023 August 28 (https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230828T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso) Status: GREEN SX sanity Passed: 17 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 17 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_2p_2_big_pod_best_effort_HT_AIO PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_single_pod[1-1-lock/unlock] PASS test_sriovdp_netdev_connectivity_ipv4[1-1-calico-ipam] PASS test_sriovdp_mixed_add_vf_interface[1] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] DX sanity Passed: 19 (100.0%) Failed: 0 (0.0%) Total Executed: 19 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS test_system_health_pre_session[pods] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[alarms] PASS test_system_health_pre_session[system_apps] PASS test_horizon_host_inventory_display PASS test_lock_unlock_host PASS test_swact_controller_platform PASS test_pod_to_pod_connection PASS test_pod_to_service_connection PASS test_host_to_service_connection PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_active PASS test_push_docker_image_to_local_registry_standby PASS test_upload_charts_via_helm_upload PASS test_host_operations_with_custom_kubectl_app PASS test_isolated_1p_1pod_AIO PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-True] PASS test_force_reboot_host[active_controller-False] PASS test_force_reboot_host[standby_controller-False] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] Regards, PV team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com Tue Aug 29 19:27:26 2023 From: ThalesElero.Cervi at windriver.com (Cervi, Thales Elero) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 19:27:26 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: OpenStack Distro Team Call (Aug 29, 2023) Message-ID: Etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-distro-openstack-meetings Minutes from the OpenStack Distro team call Aug 29, 2023 Build: - Build Issues: None Installation: - Installation Issues: None Sanity with stx-openstack (main branch): - Last Successful Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 22 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: YELLOW ??????Sanity - Passed: 13 (86.67%) | Failed: 2 (13.33%) ??????Regression - Passed: 9 (75.0%) | Failed: 3 (25.0%) - Master Build (20230820T060000Z) - Last Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 29 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: RED ??????Sanity - Executed: 0 ??????Regression - Executed: 0 - Installation issue: Internal infra issue when installing our test labs. - Bugs Affecting Weekly Sanity/Regression: - No Reproducible bugs currently open. Only intermittent issues # LP 2023657: STX-O| config-out-of-date alarm won't disappear on controller-1 after swact and reapplying app # LP 2012389: STX-Openstack: Failed to activate binding for port for live migration # LP 2007303: STX-Openstack: "nova live-migration" fails to live migrate after host is forcefully turned off/on - STX 9.0 Features Status: - Containerizing OpenStack clients: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010774 - Tests planned to start this week - OpenStack upversion (Antelope): https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2010715 - In progress: developers are testing with locally built docker images (already upversioned) - Needed/Proposed changes to build system are listed below: ????????* Allow multiple package versions in aptly bin repo: (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/893075 Currently, when downloader tries to delete a package, it uses ONLY the package name when searching for it, so if we have multiple versions of the same package, only the latest one would be considered. This proposal updates the deletion method to use both the package name and version, enabling multiple version support. Not mandatory, but a nice to have. ????????* Create specific aptly bin repo per build layer: stx-tools (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/893105 build-tools (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/893095 Currently all layers -- common, flock, distro, compiler, etc -- share the same aptly binary repository: `deb-local-binary`. This proposal updates the build system to create a separate aptly bin repo for each layer, enabling each layer to have its own version of a given package. ????????* Add openstack build layer (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/892166 ????????* Update wheels with Antelope versions (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/892245 ????????* Application specific manifest: Create STX-Openstack manifest (master): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/manifest/+/891875 Remove starlingx/openstack-armada-app from default manifest (master): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/manifest/+/893085 Remove unnecessary Openstack Debian packages and images from starlingx/upstream (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/upstream/+/892689 Uncomment packages on openstack-armada-app and change build layer (f/antelope): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/openstack-armada-app/+/892391 -- Best Regards, Thales Elero Cervi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From scott.little at windriver.com Tue Aug 29 19:48:31 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <3D52AA13-4300-4C7E-BCBD-4268997C3F7D@openinfra.dev> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> <4E226ECC-6367-485D-94CA-EBB10389CFB0@openinfra.dev> <3D52AA13-4300-4C7E-BCBD-4268997C3F7D@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <1545ff0e-e882-4025-bc21-1109733548c5@windriver.com> It was hitting many images, not just golang.? I just don't have any logs left from those failures. I don't see the OSS mark on the golang images, so perhaps those images drove our quota down to zero. However once the quota hit zero, then any anonymous download of an image could trigger the download failure, including OSS ones. The strange part was that the OSS download failures are only seen within build containers.? The same image could be anonymously download on the containers host just fine.? Both container and host were being billed to the same IP address. Scott On 2023-08-21 11:36, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi Scott, > > I also just recognized, that the snipped that you copied in refers to a golang image: ?Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit.?. DO you have the same issue with StarlingX images as well? Or is it always the golang step that fails? > > Thanks, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > >> On Aug 18, 2023, at 12:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> Great, thank you for the pointers. >> >> I reached out to Docker on the channel that is dedicated for their open source program, and also included the links that you added below so they have the full context. I will get back with updates on this thread, if I receive anything beyond what you got on the forums already. >> >> Thanks and Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Director of Community >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:40, Scott Little wrote: >>> >>> Here is a sample from a failed build ... >>> >>> docker build . --no-cache ... >>> Sending build context to Docker daemon 37.68MB >>> >>> Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 >>> toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit >>> make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 >>> >>> One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem. We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. >>> >>> I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... >>> >>> https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 >>> >>> https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 >>> >>> We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>> >>>> Hi Scott, >>>> >>>> I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: >>>> >>>> - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx >>>> - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ >>>> - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore >>>> >>>> Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? >>>> >>>> Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. >>>> >>>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>>> Ildik? >>>> >>>> ??? >>>> >>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>> Director of Community >>>> Open Infrastructure Foundation >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From ildiko at openinfra.dev Tue Aug 29 20:15:41 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 13:15:41 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub rate limit issues In-Reply-To: <1545ff0e-e882-4025-bc21-1109733548c5@windriver.com> References: <2E3BFA94-F03F-4545-AA3A-7ABAF885B923@openinfra.dev> <92826b45-9daa-19db-7ae2-9717eb0fbceb@windriver.com> <4E226ECC-6367-485D-94CA-EBB10389CFB0@openinfra.dev> <3D52AA13-4300-4C7E-BCBD-4268997C3F7D@openinfra.dev> <1545ff0e-e882-4025-bc21-1109733548c5@windriver.com> Message-ID: <9783AC48-EDCF-40B0-99BC-88ADA27F4443@openinfra.dev> Hi Scott, Thank you for the additional details. Another quick question to clarify. When you say "drove our quota down?, what does that mean exactly? What is ?our? in this context? And is that quota assigned to the IP address, or to a DockerHub user, or the images themselves? Thanks, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 29, 2023, at 12:48, Scott Little wrote: > > It was hitting many images, not just golang. I just don't have any logs left from those failures. > > I don't see the OSS mark on the golang images, so perhaps those images drove our quota down to zero. However once the quota hit zero, then any anonymous download of an image could trigger the download failure, including OSS ones. The strange part was that the OSS download failures are only seen within build containers. The same image could be anonymously download on the containers host just fine. Both container and host were being billed to the same IP address. > > Scott > > > On 2023-08-21 11:36, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> I also just recognized, that the snipped that you copied in refers to a golang image: ?Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit.?. DO you have the same issue with StarlingX images as well? Or is it always the golang step that fails? >> >> Thanks, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Director of Community >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Aug 18, 2023, at 12:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>> >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> Great, thank you for the pointers. >>> >>> I reached out to Docker on the channel that is dedicated for their open source program, and also included the links that you added below so they have the full context. I will get back with updates on this thread, if I receive anything beyond what you got on the forums already. >>> >>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>> Ildik? >>> >>> ??? >>> >>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>> Director of Community >>> Open Infrastructure Foundation >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Aug 17, 2023, at 07:40, Scott Little wrote: >>>> >>>> Here is a sample from a failed build ... >>>> >>>> docker build . --no-cache ... >>>> Sending build context to Docker daemon 37.68MB >>>> >>>> Step 1/9 : FROMgolang:1.19 >>>> toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading:https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit >>>> make: *** [builder-build] Error 1 >>>> >>>> One thing to note, It's pulls from within our build container that hits the problem. We don't see it when pulling from bare metal hardware. >>>> >>>> I've tried raising the issue with the docker community here ... >>>> >>>> https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/46092#issuecomment-1654243988 >>>> >>>> https://forums.docker.com/t/inconsistent-behaviour-of-docker-pull-rate-limit/136896/2 >>>> >>>> We seem to be avoiding the rate limit by using docker login. Formal StarlingX builds are using a couple of service accounts. Designers were asked establish there own personal accounts with dockerhub. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2023-08-16 16:17, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >>>>> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! >>>>> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. >>>>> >>>>> Hi Scott, >>>>> >>>>> I looked into the DockerHub download issue again, to the capacity that I could. To confirm what was mentioned already, I have not found anything that would explain what the community is experiencing in terms of rate limits: >>>>> >>>>> - The StarlingX project is still listed as ?Sponsored OSS?: https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx >>>>> - The DockerHub docs point to a blog post that says ?we will suspend data pull rate restrictions, where no egress restrictions will apply to any Docker users pulling images from the approved OSS namespaces?: https://www.docker.com/blog/expanded-support-for-open-source-software-projects/ >>>>> - I haven?t received any notifications from DockerHub recently about not meeting the criteria to participate in their open source program anymore >>>>> >>>>> Can you please share a screenshot or the error message that you are getting about hitting a pull rate limit? Also, are you getting that on every repo, or just specific ones? >>>>> >>>>> Once having more background information, I will reach out to the DockerHub team to see what the background issue might be. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and Best Regards, >>>>> Ildik? >>>>> >>>>> ??? >>>>> >>>>> Ildik? V?ncsa >>>>> Director of Community >>>>> Open Infrastructure Foundation >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > From Rob.Cooke at windriver.com Tue Aug 29 20:47:23 2023 From: Rob.Cooke at windriver.com (Cooke, Rob) Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 20:47:23 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: Test Status Call - Aug 29, 2023 Message-ID: Hi everyone, Please find below the minutes from this week's StarlingX Test Status Call: Minutes for 08/29/2023 * Open Topics: ? Email sent to the community around the challenges with performing release regression/system test under current STX9.0 schedule - https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014459.html * So far no responses have been received from the community on the options presented * Sanity Status: o Sanity on STX 9.0 - Green for SX and DX ? Last execution, August 28, 2023 - Results email: https://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2023-August/014467.html * Sanity on STX 9.0 plus Openstack: ? Last Successful Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 22 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: YELLOW * Sanity - Passed: 13 (86.67%) | Failed: 2 (13.33%) * Regression - Passed: 9 (75.0%) | Failed: 3 (25.0%) * Master Build (20230820T060000Z) ? Last Execution: (OVS) Tue Aug 29 12:39:12 UTC 2023 - Overall status: RED * Sanity - Executed: 0 * Regression - Executed: 0 * Installation issue: Internal infra issue when installing our test labs. ? Bugs Affecting Weekly Sanity/Regression: * No Reproducible bugs currently open. Only intermittent issues o # LP 2023657: STX-O| config-out-of-date alarm won't disappear on controller-1 after swact and reapplying app o # LP 2012389: STX-Openstack: Failed to activate binding for port for live migration o # LP 2007303: STX-Openstack: "nova live-migration" fails to live migrate after host is forcefully turned off/on * Feature Test Status: o Feature testing is tracked in the following google sheet: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1El3g0ute5K2S5DTR9p_rxa1jQlq8gcUzgMCNCE_sx8g/edit#gid=968103774 ? Some features are in progress, sheet does need updating ACTION: Rob/Nimalini * Regression Testing will be tracked here closer to release end: ? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1NjYk9N0whK91nHViB5HFG2C1-XdJ09StVuLMxsz0KAY/edit?pli=1#gid=1717644237 Thanks, Rob -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com Wed Aug 30 12:31:46 2023 From: Gabriel.CalixtodePaula at windriver.com (Calixto de Paula, Gabriel) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:31:46 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity and Regression - StarlingX + STX-Openstack MASTER build [20230829T060000Z] results - Aug - 29 Message-ID: StarlingX + STX-Openstack sanity and regression results: Overall Status: Yellow Build Info: Build date: Aug 29 - 20230829T060000Z ISO: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230829T060000Z/outputs/iso/starlingx-intel-x86-64-cd.iso Helm Chart: https://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/debian/monolithic/20230829T060000Z/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-1.stx.69-debian-stable-versioned.tgz AIO-DX Baremetal with VSWITCH_TYPE=OVS Sanity Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 13 (86.67%) Failed: 2 (13.33%) Total Executed: 15 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS??20230830 01:42:33?test_ssh_to_hosts PASS??20230830 01:43:52?test_lock_unlock_host PASS??20230830 01:59:42?test_openstack_services_healthy PASS??20230830 02:00:44?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-0] PASS??20230830 02:02:31?test_reapply_stx_openstack_no_change[controller-1] PASS??20230830 02:10:31?test_horizon_create_delete_instance PASS??20230830 02:13:06?test_swact_controllers PASS??20230830 02:20:51?test_ping_between_two_vms[tis-centos-guest-virtio-virtio] FAIL?? 20230830 02:27:11?test_migrate_vm[tis-centos-guest-live-None] PASS??20230830 02:44:26?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-pause-unpause] PASS??20230830 02:48:50?test_nova_actions[tis-centos-guest-dedicated-suspend-resume] FAIL?? 20230830 02:53:12?test_evacuate_vms PASS??20230830 03:27:28?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[core_dumps] PASS??20230830 03:27:44?test_system_coredumps_and_crashes[crash_reports] PASS??20230830 03:27:51?test_system_alarms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- test_migrate_vm and test_evacuate_vms failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration Regression Results: Overall Status: Yellow Automated Test Results Summary: ------------------------------------------------------ Passed: 9 (75.0%) Failed: 3 (25.0%) Total Executed: 12 List of Test Cases: ------------------------------------------------------ PASS 20230830 03:33:02 test_lldp_neighbor_remote_port PASS 20230830 03:34:28 test_kernel_module_signatures PASS 20230830 03:35:46 test_delete_heat_after_swact[OS_Cinder_Volume.yaml] PASS 20230830 03:40:21 test_multiports_on_same_network_vm_actions[virtio_x4] FAIL 20230830 04:00:47 test_cpu_pol_vm_actions[2-dedicated-image-volume] PASS 20230830 04:12:20 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[2048] PASS 20230830 04:15:30 test_vm_mem_pool_default_config[1048576] PASS 20230830 04:21:08 test_resize_vm_positive[local_image-4_1_512-5_2_1024-image] PASS 20230830 04:28:07 test_server_group_boot_vms[affinity-2] PASS 20230830 04:33:16 test_server_group_boot_vms[anti_affinity-2] FAIL 20230830 04:38:43 test_vm_with_config_drive FAIL 20230830 05:01:24 test_lock_with_vms ----------------------------------------------------------------------- test_cpu_pol_vm_actions failed due to #2030888 - STX | Unexpected failure of live migration, test_lock_with_vms and test_vm_with_config_drive failed due to :#2030889 - STX | DX Controller-1 is not in locked state Thanks, STX-Openstack Distro Team -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Tianyu.Li at arm.com Wed Aug 30 07:32:21 2023 From: Tianyu.Li at arm.com (Tianyu Li) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 07:32:21 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> Message-ID: Thanks Davlet and Scott for information, I tried to setup the Jenkins pipeline jobs on local Arm server, after applied Jackie's Arm porting patches[0] with environment variable PATCH_LIST, the build job passed some stage and failed at 'download-prerequisites' with following log[1], looks like the downloader still trying to download some x86 packages. Any idea what could cause this? I have another general question regarding testing stage in CI/CD process, What is the minimum automation test case should be done after image is done? If Davlet and Scott are not familiar with this area, who can help on this? FYI, this is our plan to support StartingX CI/CD on Arm. 1. Reproduce the build CI/CD on arm in our internal lab 2. Verify procedure to trigger test cases for CI/CD on arm machine (internal lab) with few selected cases 3. Discuss with community to merge code changes to enable CI/CD on arm in community lab once arm servers are in place. 4. Fix build and ?minimal test set? errors by all maintainers of community 5. Enable voting right by community per necessary [0] https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:arm64/20230725-stx-master-native [1] downloaderERROR "The cache has no package named 'gcc-alpha-linux-gnu'" Thanks, Tianyu ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2023 8:57 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet ; Tianyu Li Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io ; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott / Davlet, As we discussed on the OS Distro call, a local CENGEN like server is needed for the local CI/CD setup, Could you please share the info of how to setup a CENGEN like server, specifically how to prepare the package mirror, we need to get it setup and prepare the mirror for ARM deb packages, and for the LAT-SDK for ARM as well. Thanks! Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Friday, August 18, 2023 1:33 PM To: Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet ; Tianyu Li Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott, Thanks for sharing, it?s very helpful. Thanks, Jackie From: Little, Scott > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:48 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Wang, Linda > Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform There is also ... https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins Which contains the current state of the StarlingX jenkins setup, less a few credentials. It includes 'Debian_build_server.txt' with crude documentation of how the server was setup. Scott On 2023-08-16 21:04, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: Hi Davlet, Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu and I will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are any more questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Panech, Davlet Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM To: Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Little, Scott ; Tianyu Li ; Wang, Linda Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) Subject: Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Jackie, CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & automated testing. I know little about test automation, the current build set up is outlined below. You would need a dedicated server: 1. Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter since most build steps run in docker containers 2. Docker 3. Kubernetes 4. Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines 5. git 6. git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo Other prerequisites: 1. You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate limits when pulling images 2. Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to Docker Hub. Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. 1. The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with shared functions under vars/ . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. 2. pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ 3. pipelines/parts/ : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in git repo 4. scripts/ : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by Jenkinsfiles) Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas 2. /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an example configuration file in the project build area that you are expected to copy & edit: 1. /localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example There are many options with comments in it; the example file is also source controlled under scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs etc). Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and ping me if you have any more questions. Hope this helps, D. ________________________________ From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Sent: August 9, 2023 10:28 AM To: Little, Scott >; Panech, Davlet >; Tianyu Li >; Wang, Linda > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io >; Scott Kamp >; Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Scott and Davlet, As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as you can, thanks! There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? 2. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? 3. How many efforts and how long will it take? 4. Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu from Arm team and I can also help on that if we got enough information. Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. Thanks, Jackie From: Huang, Jie (Jackie) Sent: Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM To: Trevor Tao >; Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; Little, Scott >; Scott Kamp > Cc: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status | OpenDev Etherpad: o ARM Support * Action: Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to provide assistance/access to some arm machines * Action: Scott Little to respond regarding build questions * Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we transition away from CENGN * Action: Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment configs), what we want to know is: 1. What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? a. E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? b. What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. c. Are there any docs for these setups? 2. How many efforts and how long will it take? 3. Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or just providing useful information? Thanks, Jackie From: Trevor Tao > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM To: Geary, Stephen (Steve) >; starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Cc: Huang, Jie (Jackie) > Subject: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform Hi Steve, StarlingX: From the OS distro meeting yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community to do the CI/CD related work. So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD environment on the arm platform, and any other useful information/details for the CI/CD issue here. Thanks, Best Regards, Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ?????????????? Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park? , No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 Cell: +86-153 7109 6192 IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Bruce.Jones at windriver.com Wed Aug 30 14:18:11 2023 From: Bruce.Jones at windriver.com (Jones, Bruce) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 14:18:11 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Kata containers in STX 9.0... Message-ID: As discussed in the community meeting today, re-storing support for Kata containers in StarlingX is not likely to make the STX 9.0 release. I'm looking for community feedback as to whether or not we should try to complete this work for the release. The work is in progress and reviews are posted. More eyes on the reviews are always welcome! https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/virt/+/885342 and related reviews: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/tools/+/885946 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/integ/+/886252 https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/integ/+/883893 brucej -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 30 15:13:45 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 08:13:45 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application Message-ID: <04F095B8-21E1-4A82-8C94-2DE792BB4941@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, I just submitted the form to renew our participation in Docker?s OSS Program on DockerHub. They have a 30-day window to respond to this request. I will keep the community up to date as I receive further information. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation From scott.little at windriver.com Wed Aug 30 20:20:02 2023 From: scott.little at windriver.com (Scott Little) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:20:02 -0400 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform In-Reply-To: References: <0d974610-db91-4729-9083-240478b3e03c@windriver.com> Message-ID: The Jenkins setup at https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins has 99% of what is needed to populate a StarlingX mirror. The Jenkins jobs assume that writing to /export/mirror/ is populating https://mirror.starlingx.windriver.com/mirror/ ... formerly http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/? . The webserver imports the same filesystem as /starlingx/mirror/ The webserver nginx config is ... /etc/nginx/sites-available/default server { ?? ?listen????????????? 80; ?? ?listen????????????? 443 ssl default_server; ?? ?listen????????????? [::]:443 ssl default_server; ?? ?server_name???????? mirror.starlingx.windriver.com; ?? ?ssl_certificate /etc/ssl/certs/mirror_starlingx_windriver_com-full.crt; ?? ?ssl_certificate_key /etc/ssl/private/mirror_starlingx_windriver_com.key; ?? ?ssl_protocols?????? TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3; ?? ?ssl_ciphers HIGH:!aNULL:!MD5; ?? ?root /var/www/html; ?? ?index index.html index.htm index.nginx-debian.html; ?? ?location / { ?? ???? try_files $uri $uri/ =404; ?? ?} ??????? location /mirror/ { ??????????? alias /starlingx/mirror/; ??????????? autoindex on; ??????????? autoindex_exact_size off; ??????????? autoindex_format html; ??????????? autoindex_localtime off; ??????? } } You'll need to substitute your own server name and ssl certificate. Tracking down and substituting all the references to mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca in the StarlingX source code is the trick.?? I need to do something similar to replace mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca with mirror.starlingx.windriver.com. Attached is a tarfile with the content of /export/config/debian/ It drives which debian repo's are mirrored.? You'll need to adapt it for arm. The last piece you need is a /export/config/debian/mirrorkeyring for the keys validate the debian sources you are pulling down. Scott On 2023-08-24 08:57, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: > > Hi Scott / Davlet, > > As we discussed on the OS Distro call, a local CENGEN like server is > needed for the local CI/CD setup, > > Could you please share the info of how to setup a CENGEN like server, > specifically how to prepare the > > package mirror, we need to get it setup and prepare the mirror for ARM > deb packages, and for the > > LAT-SDK for ARM as well. Thanks! > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Sent:* Friday, August 18, 2023 1:33 PM > *To:* Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet > ; Tianyu Li > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda > > *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for sharing, it?s very helpful. > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Little, Scott > *Sent:* Thursday, August 17, 2023 11:48 PM > *To:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) ; Panech, Davlet > ; Tianyu Li > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) ; Wang, Linda > > *Subject:* Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > There is also ... > > https://github.com/starlingx-staging/jenkins > > > Which contains the current state of the StarlingX jenkins setup, less > a few credentials. > > It includes 'Debian_build_server.txt' with crude documentation of how > the server was setup. > > Scott > > On 2023-08-16 21:04, Huang, Jie (Jackie) wrote: > > Hi Davlet, > > Thanks for the detailed answers, which are very helpful, Tianyu > and I will start by familiarizing ourselves and check if there are > any more questions. > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Panech, Davlet > > *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2023 11:30 PM > *To:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) > ; Little, Scott > ; > Tianyu Li ; Wang, > Linda > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor > Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) > > *Subject:* Re: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Jackie, > > CI/CD can be thought of as 2 somewhat disconnected parts - build & > automated testing. I know little about test automation, the > current build set up is outlined below. > > You would need a dedicated server: > > 1.Linux : we currently use Debian 11, but it shouldn't matter > since most build steps run in docker containers > > 2.Docker > > 3.Kubernetes > > 4.Jenkins: integrated with k8s and able to run k8s pipelines > > 5.git > > 6.git-repo https://gerrit.googlesource.com/git-repo > > > Other prerequisites: > > 1.You would need some DockerHub account to avoid DockerHub's rate > limits when pulling images > > 2.Once your ARM set up is ready we can replace that with a > controlled account that we manage in order to push the images to > Docker Hub. > > Jenkins job definitions (Jenkinsfiles) are source-controlled here: > https://opendev.org/starlingx/jenkins-pipelines > > . You would need to define Jenkins jobs manually in the GUI, and > point them to the corresponding Jenkinsfiles in this git repo. > > 1.The repo itself acts as a pipeline library in Jenkins with > shared functions under vars/ > > . The library must be defined at Jenkins' folder level. > > 2.pipelines/monolithic.Jenkinsfile > > : top-level job that calls other jobs under parts/ > > 3.pipelines/parts/ > > : directory containing sub-job Jenkinsfiles. You would create a > Jenkins folder in the GUI called "parts" and define individual > jobs pointing to individual Jenkinsfiles from this subdirectory in > git repo > > 4.scripts/ > > : shell scripts that implement individual build steps (called by > Jenkinsfiles) > > Required directories on the server, owned by jenkins user: > > 1./localdisk/designer/jenkins/ root for per-project build areas > > 2./localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/ root for per-project build archives > > At first execution the monolithic job will fail, but create an > example configuration file in the project build area that you are > expected to copy & edit: > > 1./localdisk/designer/jenkins/$PROJECT/build.cond.example > > There are many options with comments in it; the example file is > also source controlled under > scripts/templates/build.conf.example.in > > > Builds are slow and would greatly benefit from fast storage (SSDs > etc). > > Please start by familiarizing yourself with this repository and > ping me if you have any more questions. > > Hope this helps, > > D. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:*Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Sent:* August 9, 2023 10:28 AM > *To:* Little, Scott ; Panech, Davlet > ; Tianyu Li ; > Wang, Linda > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > ; Scott Kamp > ; Trevor Tao ; Geary, > Stephen (Steve) > *Subject:* RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Scott and Davlet, > > As mentioned in the Multi-OS call, I?m re-sending this with all > the questions about StarlingX CI/CD, please help answer as many as > you can, thanks! > > There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for > CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment > configs), what we want to know is: > > 1.What?s the current status of StarlingX CICD for x86-64? > > 2.What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how after > the 6 ARM servers are ready and hosted in the lab? > > a.E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? > > b.What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. > > c.Are there any docs or info of the steps for these setups? > > 3.How many efforts and how long will it take? > > 4.Can this only be done by specific person? Or anyone have > permission to access to the servers? If the later, I think Tianyu > from Arm team and I can also help > > on that if we got enough information. > > Tianyu, please add if you have any other questions. > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2023 12:57 PM > *To:* Trevor Tao ; Geary, Stephen (Steve) > ; Little, Scott > ; Scott Kamp > *Cc:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Subject:* RE: StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi, Scott Kamp and Scott Little, > > I found the following actions in the meeting minutes in stx-status > | OpenDev Etherpad > : > > oARM Support > > ?_Action:_?Scott Kamp to respond to Jackie/the mailing list to > provide assistance/access to some arm machines > > ?_Action:_?Scott Little to respond regarding build questions > > ?Cannot mirror more files on CENGN; will need to wait until we > transition away from CENGN > > ?_Action:_?Scott Kamp to explore providing a hosting env temporarily > > So I think you might be able to help on Trevor?s and my questions: > > There would be 6 Arm servers contributed to our community for > CI/CD (2 for build, 4 for testing of different deployment > configs), what we want to know is: > > 1.What needs to be done for the CICD workflow setup and how? > > a.E.g. how to setup build servers and testing env? > > b.What CICD tools need to be setup? Zuul/Jenkins/etc. > > c.Are there any docs for these setups? > > 2.How many efforts and how long will it take? > > 3.Is there a CICD team or someone that can help on the setup or > just providing useful information? > > Thanks, > > Jackie > > *From:*Trevor Tao > *Sent:* Thursday, July 27, 2023 5:06 PM > *To:* Geary, Stephen (Steve) ; > starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Cc:* Huang, Jie (Jackie) > *Subject:* StarlingX CI/CD setup on Arm platform > > Hi Steve, StarlingX: > > From the OS distro meeting > > yesterday, we knew that there would be 6 Arm servers contributed > to our community to do the CI/CD related work. > > So we would like to ask who can help on the setup of CI/CD > environment on the arm platform, and any other useful > information/details for the CI/CD issue here. > > Thanks, > > Best Regards, > > Zijin Tao(Trevor Tao, ???) > > ARM Electronic Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd > > ?????????????? > > Building 11, Shanghai Busininess Park?, > > No.1016 Tianlin Rd, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200233 China > > ?????????1016???????2??10??200233 > > Cell: ? +86-153 7109 6192 > > IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments > are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the > intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do > not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any > purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: mirror.cfg.tgz Type: application/x-compressed-tar Size: 754 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Wed Aug 30 22:24:42 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 15:24:42 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application - APPROVED In-Reply-To: <04F095B8-21E1-4A82-8C94-2DE792BB4941@openinfra.dev> References: <04F095B8-21E1-4A82-8C94-2DE792BB4941@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <6B52CDD9-91F3-45BD-BB01-86CECE3ABFE9@openinfra.dev> Hi StarlingX Community, I have an exciting update! I just received the following note from Docker: ?Congratulations! Your project has been approved for the Docker-Sponsored Open Source program. A Docker Team subscription will be allocated to the project organization Docker ID specified in your application within the next 3 weeks. In addition to a Team subscription, you now have: * free autobuilds * rate-limit removal for all users pulling public images from your project namespace * special badging on Docker Hub (this will be visible within two weeks)" I will keep an eye on the DockerHub organization to see when they update the subscription. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 30, 2023, at 08:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I just submitted the form to renew our participation in Docker?s OSS Program on DockerHub. They have a 30-day window to respond to this request. I will keep the community up to date as I receive further information. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Aug 31 11:58:53 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:58:53 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Security Initiatives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Absolutely. What were you interested in looking into wrt StarlingX Security ? Greg. From: Manju Rupani Sent: Monday, August 28, 2023 1:15 PM To: starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Security Initiatives CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello all, I was wondering if there is interest in collaborating on security initiatives. Thanks, Manju Rupani 6304455096 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Greg.Waines at windriver.com Thu Aug 31 11:59:55 2023 From: Greg.Waines at windriver.com (Waines, Greg) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 11:59:55 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application - APPROVED In-Reply-To: <6B52CDD9-91F3-45BD-BB01-86CECE3ABFE9@openinfra.dev> References: <04F095B8-21E1-4A82-8C94-2DE792BB4941@openinfra.dev> <6B52CDD9-91F3-45BD-BB01-86CECE3ABFE9@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: Woohoo .... nice work Ildiko. Greg. p.s. can someone confirm that the rate limits are removed ? -----Original Message----- From: Ildiko Vancsa Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 6:25 PM To: StarlingX ML Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application - APPROVED CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi StarlingX Community, I have an exciting update! I just received the following note from Docker: ?Congratulations! Your project has been approved for the Docker-Sponsored Open Source program. A Docker Team subscription will be allocated to the project organization Docker ID specified in your application within the next 3 weeks. In addition to a Team subscription, you now have: * free autobuilds * rate-limit removal for all users pulling public images from your project namespace * special badging on Docker Hub (this will be visible within two weeks)" I will keep an eye on the DockerHub organization to see when they update the subscription. Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 30, 2023, at 08:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I just submitted the form to renew our participation in Docker?s OSS Program on DockerHub. They have a 30-day window to respond to this request. I will keep the community up to date as I receive further information. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io From Steven.Webster at windriver.com Thu Aug 31 14:19:01 2023 From: Steven.Webster at windriver.com (Webster, Steven) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:19:01 +0000 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Minutes: networking sub-team meeting 08-31-23 Message-ID: ======== Next meeting: 09-14-23 Meeting logistics: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings Agenda/Detailed minutes are posted at: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-networking ======== Feature Updates: Intel Ethernet Operator Support: - Most of the code has merged - now down to publishing/tagging of UFT image * Main app has merged: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/app-intel-ethernet-operator/+/890199 * Manifest has merged (as of 08/30/2023): https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/manifest/+/890433 * Once the image shows up on dockerhub (if image builds pass and are published), the tagging can occur: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/root/+/893029 Intel FEC Operator * Doc review for FEC update: https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/docs/+/893111 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From manjrupani at gmail.com Thu Aug 31 12:06:53 2023 From: manjrupani at gmail.com (Manju Rupani) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 07:06:53 -0500 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Security Initiatives In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Greg, Thanks for your email. I am interested in taking a deeper dive into understanding all security loopholes. What sort of hardware is ideal? Can information in transmission for IOT applications be compromised? I have worked in linux only in my research work and have never had to worry about security issues. Thanks for continuing this conversation. Regards, Manju Rupani 6304455096 On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 6:58?AM Waines, Greg wrote: > Absolutely. > > What were you interested in looking into wrt StarlingX Security ? > > > > Greg. > > > > *From:* Manju Rupani > *Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2023 1:15 PM > *To:* starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > *Subject:* [Starlingx-discuss] Security Initiatives > > > > *CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!* > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and > know the content is safe. > > Hello all, > > I was wondering if there is interest in collaborating on security > initiatives. > > > > Thanks, > > Manju Rupani > > 6304455096 > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ildiko at openinfra.dev Thu Aug 31 22:35:30 2023 From: ildiko at openinfra.dev (Ildiko Vancsa) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:35:30 -0700 Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application - ACTION NEEDED In-Reply-To: References: <04F095B8-21E1-4A82-8C94-2DE792BB4941@openinfra.dev> <6B52CDD9-91F3-45BD-BB01-86CECE3ABFE9@openinfra.dev> Message-ID: <92AE57E5-4F60-406C-9FC5-94B99C836AE7@openinfra.dev> Hi, Thanks Greg. Please be aware of the 3-week window that they specified as the time might be needed for this to go through their system. __Documentation REQUIREMENT__ I also got a separate email to remind our community that it is a requirement to add documentation to the repos on DockerHub: ?However, all the repositories under the starlingx namespace (https://hub.docker.com/u/starlingx) lack adequate documentation which is a requirement (https://www.docker.com/community/open-source/application/#:~:text=Qualification%20Criteria) of the Docker-Sponsored Open Source program. We kindly ask you to update the documentation for your repositories within 2 working weeks. Please keep in mind that failure to provide the necessary updates may result in the de-provisioning of your benefits." I received the email on August 30, which makes the deadline __September 13__. I added a short description and a very high-level and generic text about StarlingX, including links to docs and how to contribute, to every repo under the ?starlingx? DockerHub organization. I, however, do not have enough knowledge to describe the images that are in the various repos and cannot fill out the overview docs with that information. Please extend the repo overview docs to meet the recommendations that can be found here: https://docs.docker.com/docker-hub/repos/create/?_gl=1*xor6rh*_ga*ODMwOTI5NzE5LjE2OTIxOTYzNzQ.*_ga_XJWPQMJYHQ*MTY5MzUyMTA2Ni4xNS4xLjE2OTM1MjEwNjkuNTcuMC4w#add-a-repository-overview Thanks and Best Regards, Ildik? ??? Ildik? V?ncsa Director of Community Open Infrastructure Foundation > On Aug 31, 2023, at 04:59, Waines, Greg wrote: > > Woohoo .... nice work Ildiko. > Greg. > > p.s. can someone confirm that the rate limits are removed ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ildiko Vancsa > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 6:25 PM > To: StarlingX ML > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] DockerHub OSS Program application - APPROVED > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account! > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. > > Hi StarlingX Community, > > I have an exciting update! > > I just received the following note from Docker: > > ?Congratulations! Your project has been approved for the Docker-Sponsored Open Source program. A Docker Team subscription will be allocated to the project organization Docker ID specified in your application within the next 3 weeks. In addition to a Team subscription, you now have: > > * free autobuilds > * rate-limit removal for all users pulling public images from your project namespace > * special badging on Docker Hub (this will be visible within two weeks)" > > I will keep an eye on the DockerHub organization to see when they update the subscription. > > Best Regards, > Ildik? > > ??? > > Ildik? V?ncsa > Director of Community > Open Infrastructure Foundation > > > > > >> On Aug 30, 2023, at 08:13, Ildiko Vancsa wrote: >> >> Hi StarlingX Community, >> >> I just submitted the form to renew our participation in Docker?s OSS Program on DockerHub. They have a 30-day window to respond to this request. I will keep the community up to date as I receive further information. >> >> Best Regards, >> Ildik? >> >> ??? >> >> Ildik? V?ncsa >> Director of Community >> Open Infrastructure Foundation >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io > > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss at lists.starlingx.io