<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Yes, your analysis is correct. Our patch (e5712fe) can be dropped because the issue has now been addressed by upstream commit (e45add7b07e5c72c43047d18e10af1c4ae307b0f).<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Allain<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">Allain Legacy</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">, Software Developer, Wind River</span><span style="color:#1F497D"><br>
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">direct 613.270.2279 fax
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#333333">613.492.7870 skype allain.legacy<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#404040">350 Terry Fox Drive, Suite 200, Ottawa, Ontario, K2K 2W5<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><br>
<br>
</span><a href="http://www.windriver.com/" title=""Innovators Start Here" "><span style="font-family:"Arial",sans-serif;color:#CC0000;text-decoration:none"><img border="0" width="160" height="92" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image001.png@01D4620B.6BAB55A0" alt="WIND"></span></a><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b>From:</b> Qin, Kailun [mailto:kailun.qin@intel.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, October 12, 2018 6:33 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Peters, Matt<br>
<b>Cc:</b> starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [Starlingx-discuss] Question about patch upstreaming for e5712fe<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Matt,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We’re looking into the patch e5712fe, which indicates a possible inconsistency/mismatch of tag values between dnsmasq option files and dnsmasq command line.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">From the commit message: “This seems to be happening because of how dhcp_rpc.py::_group_by_network_id would behave if the list of subnets coming from the database was ordered different or contained different values.” After checking, we
found that the latest Neutron seems to already have subnets sorted: <a href="https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/api/rpc/handlers/dhcp_rpc.py#L150L154">
https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/api/rpc/handlers/dhcp_rpc.py#L150L154</a>.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Would you please kindly help double check on this? Let me know if any question. Thank you!<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">BR,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kailun<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>