<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 11:54 AM Victor Rodriguez <<a href="mailto:vm.rod25@gmail.com">vm.rod25@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi team<br>
<br>
After some research on the topic and the great help from Numan's team,<br>
I came into this great presentation about how to use OPNFV for<br>
performance metrics (video available at [0]):<br>
<br>
<a href="https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/OpenStack-Summit-Vancouver-OPNFV-Test-tools-2.pdf" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.openstack.org/assets/presentation-media/OpenStack-Summit-Vancouver-OPNFV-Test-tools-2.pdf</a><br>
<br>
It was presented on May 2018 OpenStack Summit, Here is described<br>
Yardstick Test Case for performance measurement, They do have a very<br>
good wiki on how to do :<br>
<br>
Installation and run:<br>
<a href="http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/colorado/2.0/docs/userguide/index.html#document-07-installation" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://artifacts.opnfv.org/yardstick/colorado/2.0/docs/userguide/index.html#document-07-installation</a><br>
<br>
Description of every test case :<br>
<a href="https://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-fraser/submodules/yardstick/docs/testing/user/userguide/15-list-of-tcs.html" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://docs.opnfv.org/en/stable-fraser/submodules/yardstick/docs/testing/user/userguide/15-list-of-tcs.html</a><br>
<br>
After a quick view, Yardstick has the capability to measure<br>
performance in 3 sections:<br>
<br>
* Compute<br>
* Storage<br>
* Network<br>
<br>
With multiple tests cases for each one ( slide 13 of presentation )<br>
<br>
This is a simple update to keep the community informed about the<br>
progress on this topic, if someone has any feedback, please let me<br>
know.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I haven't used Yardstick, but it sounds like a step in the right direction. Perhaps we can find things to push back upstream to OPNFV.<br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">What I'm hoping is that we can use the Packet.com resources that should be available soon to run automated performance tests and then publish the results on a continual basis. I'm definitely interested in helping out. :)</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Thanks,</div><div style="font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Curtis<br></div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Numan/ Peng thanks a lot for the document, after reading I realize it<br>
is focused on Tempest ( which is used by OPNFV but as part of<br>
Functest, which is the test framework provided to answer the question:<br>
Does my infrastructure simply work as expected?.<br>
<br>
Regards<br>
<br>
BTW, sorry for the long delay of an update for this topic<br>
<br>
Victor Rodriguez<br>
<br>
[0] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxMbF8ILl-M" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxMbF8ILl-M</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Starlingx-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" target="_blank">Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">Blog: <a href="http://serverascode.com" target="_blank">serverascode.com</a></div></div>