<div dir="ltr">HI team/Marcela<div><br></div><div>Following this experiment,  here are the results of building the stx SRPMs with simple mock build system: </div><div><br></div><div><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kWrV3A28tTc3xgKiYtbir3ymcI4pew3VosE0jfB9_Fo/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kWrV3A28tTc3xgKiYtbir3ymcI4pew3VosE0jfB9_Fo/edit?usp=sharing</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Marcela, we can work on fixing them one by one. If I am missing something on the list of SRPMs that need to be built, please let me know </div><div><br></div><div>I also updated the script and Makefile based on the patch from Dean ( thanks )</div><div><br></div><div>Regards</div><div><br></div><div>Victor Rodriguez</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 12:03 PM Victor Rodriguez <<a href="mailto:vm.rod25@gmail.com">vm.rod25@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Awesome, thanks!<br>
<br>
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 9:35 AM Scott Little <<a href="mailto:scott.little@windriver.com" target="_blank">scott.little@windriver.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> The server multi-thread, and only one server thread had lost<br>
> connectivity of the ceph back end.  It's fixed now.<br>
><br>
> Scott<br>
><br>
> On 2019-08-14 6:42 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote:<br>
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 2:18 PM Scott Little <<a href="mailto:scott.little@windriver.com" target="_blank">scott.little@windriver.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> I've never seen a 404 or 403 myself, outside of the 3 or 4 extended<br>
> >> outages attributed to know issues at cengn.<br>
> > [...]<br>
> >> How many folks have seen this?  What was the time of the event?  How<br>
> >> long did it persist?  Please report events in UTC.<br>
> > So I've been poking at this for the last few minutes, so around 2200-2230 UTC<br>
> ><br>
> > These links work:<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190811T053000Z/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190811T053000Z/</a><br>
> > <a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190813T033000Z/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190813T033000Z/</a><br>
> ><br>
> > These do not:<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190812T033004Z/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190812T033004Z/</a><br>
> > <a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190814T053000Z/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190814T053000Z/</a><br>
> ><br>
> > Until I tried them again to write this email, then they swapped.<br>
> ><br>
> > Is there perchance a load balancer in front of multiple web servers<br>
> > and one of the backends is having trouble?  Even if that isn't the<br>
> > case that seems to describe the observed behaviour well enough.<br>
> ><br>
> > dt<br>
> ><br>
><br>
</blockquote></div>