<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0in;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:black;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;
color:black;}
span.timestamp
{mso-style-name:timestamp;}
span.EmailStyle24
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext">Scott, I assume you meant to provide a link to this load:
<a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210514T224518Z/outputs/iso/">
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/202105<b>14T224518Z</b>/outputs/iso/</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:windowtext"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="color:windowtext"> Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com>
<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, May 15, 2021 2:58 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Problem with STX 5.0 builds from CENGN<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We have a valid iso. The build was time stamp 20210514T224518Z<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210512T230401Z/outputs/iso/">
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/202105<span style="color:red">12T230401Z</span>/outputs/iso/</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">We do NOT yet have a successful build of the docker images<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">The failed images are:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<pre><span class="timestamp"><b>00:19:18</b> </span>stx-openstackclients<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span class="timestamp"><b>00:19:18</b> </span>stx-placement<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span class="timestamp"><b>00:19:18</b> </span>stx-platformclients<o:p></o:p></pre>
<pre><span class="timestamp"><b>00:19:18</b> </span>stx-vault-manager<o:p></o:p></pre>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 2021-05-15 2:41 p.m., Scott Little wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">I can confirm the build is now using the intended branch. <br>
<br>
The following packages were 'rolled back' to these earlier versions ... <br>
<br>
cgts-client-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
cgts-client-wheels-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
collectd-extensions-1.0-0.tis.60.x86_64.rpm <br>
controllerconfig-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
controllerconfig-wheels-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-client-dcmanagerclient-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-client-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-dccommon-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-dcdbsync-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-dcmanager-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-dcorch-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm <br>
distributedcloud-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm <br>
fm-api-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
fm-api-doc-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
fm-api-wheels-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
fm-doc-1.0-36.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
io-scheduler-1.0-2.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-common-dev-1.0-139.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-debuginfo-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-dev-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-hostw-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-hwmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-lmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
mtce-pmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-client-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-common-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-plugins-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-tools-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-vim-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
nfv-wheels-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
pam-config-1.0-7.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-kickstarts-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-kickstarts-extracfgs-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-kickstarts-pxeboot-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-util-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-util-controller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-util-noncontroller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
platform-util-wheels-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
playbookconfig-1.0-518.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
puppet-manifests-1.0.0-754.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-wheels-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-wheels-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-oidc-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-oidc-wheels-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-openstack-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-openstack-wheels-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-portieris-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-portieris-wheels-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-wheels-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-rook-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-rook-wheels-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-vault-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
python-k8sapp-vault-wheels-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
sm-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
sm-debuginfo-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
starlingx-dashboard-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
starlingx-dashboard-wheels-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-cert-manager-helm-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-oidc-auth-helm-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-openstack-helm-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-portieris-helm-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-ptp-notification-helm-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-rook-ceph-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
stx-vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
sysinv-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
sysinv-wheels-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
systemd-config-1.0-9.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
tsconfig-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
tsconfig-wheels-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm <br>
workerconfig-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
workerconfig-standalone-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
workerconfig-subfunction-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 2021-05-14 4:19 p.m., Scott Little wrote: <br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">I regret to say that all STX 5.0 build to date have been invalid.
<br>
<br>
They have been picking up unintended content from the master branch. <br>
<br>
The problem was first spotted several weeks ago, and we thought we had it fixed, but it turns out a build optimization has kept the the invalid content in place, rather than overwriting it with the correct STX.5.0 content.
<br>
<br>
I'm working to fix fully this time. Expect to see a few unscheduled builds this weekend. I'll let you know when I'm confident of the result.
<br>
<br>
With apologies, <br>
<br>
Scott <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Starlingx-discuss mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io">Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io</a>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss">http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Starlingx-discuss mailing list <br>
<a href="mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io">Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io</a>
<br>
<a href="http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss">http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss</a>
<o:p></o:p></p>
</blockquote>
<p><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>