October 2018 - Starlingx-discuss

[Starlingx-discuss] Agenda: Weekly StarlingX non-OpenStack Distro meeting, 10/24
by Xie, Cindy 23 Oct '18

23 Oct '18

Please let me know if any specific topics you'd like to discuss on 10/24. Below are the agendas I have: Agenda for 10/24 meeting: - bug review for non-openstack distro (Cindy) - non-Openstack patch refactor status (Zhipeng) - non-Openstack patch upstream status (Saul) - Ceph upgrade status (Vivian/Dehao) - Opens (All) -----Original Appointment----- From: Xie, Cindy Sent: Friday, August 24, 2018 9:38 AM To: Xie, Cindy; 'Ildiko Vancsa'; Wold, Saul; Chen, Yan; Somerville, Jim; Wang, Yi C; Khalil, Ghada; starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io; Sun, Austin; Rowsell, Brent; Lin, Shuicheng Cc: Hu, Yong; Martinez Monroy, Elio; 'Leo Xu'; 'Young, Ken'; Gomez, Juan P; Shang, Dehao; 'Eslimi, Dariush'; Qi, Mingyuan; Hernandez Gonzalez, Fernando; 'Waines, Greg'; Perez Rodriguez, Humberto I; Zhu, Vivian; Arce Moreno, Abraham; 'Chen, Jacky'; Jones, Bruce E; Cobbley, David A; 'Komiyama, Takeo'; Hu, Wei W; 'Seiler, Glenn' Subject: Weekly StarlingX non-OpenStack Distro meeting When: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:00 PM-10:00 PM (UTC+08:00) Beijing, Chongqing, Hong Kong, Urumqi. Where: https://zoom.us/j/342730236 . Cadence and time slot: o Wednesday 9AM EDT (9PM China time) . Call Details: o Zoom link: https://zoom.us/j/342730236 o Dialing in from phone: o Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 669 900 6833 or +1 646 876 9923 o Meeting ID: 342 730 236 o International numbers available: https://zoom.us/u/ed95sU7aQ . Meeting Agenda and Minutes: o https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-distro-other

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] make file updation
by Rajesh Jha 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hi, This is an observation which we made while doing the build for an iso image for StarlingX, which we think can be looked into and improved upon. The observation is given below. $ make build can we look at the make file and ensure that it doesn't look for components which are not yet part of official StarlingX release. Best Regards, Rajesh Jha The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. R Systems has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment.

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [ Test ] October release status - 10-22-18
by Cabrales, Ada 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Sanity on stx-2018-10-22-32-r-2018.10.iso 31 TCs PASS, 0 TCs FAIL. - "Error on system restore attempt" [0] created today, happened on duplex bare metal configuration. However this was not reproduced in other configurations. Will go into deeper debug. - "Cannot launch an instance with local storage" [1] seen in multi node with local storage, both bare metal and virtual. Assigned for debugging. - Execution complete on Simplex Bare metal, Duplex bare metal and virtual, multinode local storage bare metal and virtual, multinode external storage bare metal. - Execution on Simplex virtual began today. - Testing report for this release WIP (failures, verification of those, decisions made, etc). - Execution progress (Fail/Pass/Pending/Total) Simplex bare metal - 2/4/0/76 - done Simplex virtual - 1/11/55/67 Duplex bare metal - 5/93/0/98 - done Duplex virtual - 3/100/0/103 - done Multinode local storage bare metal - 5/113/0/118 - done Multinode local storage virtual - 11/115/0/126 - done Multinode external storage bare metal - 3/112/0/115 - done Multinode external storage virtual - 6/107/5/118 Full report in the wiki [2] [0] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1799271 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1799312 [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/stx.2018.10_TestingSummary

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build]Build report ww42 Oct 14 - Oct 21
by Lara, Cesar 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Build report Oct 14 - Oct 21 Intel build Release Branch 9 successful builds 0 Failed builds Master Branch 3 successful builds 1 Failed, expected error solved, config issues Changes - >From repo: stx-config.git ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE COMMIT MESSAGE AUTHOR ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2018-10-15 13:58:36 -0400 a7cdb4c OVS: fix memory pool allocation for virtual environment steven.webster(a)windriver.com<mailto:steven.webster@windriver.com> 2018-10-17 13:41:00 -0400 fb3f45d Set neutron dhcp host agent scheduler to host-based teresa.ho(a)windriver.com<mailto:teresa.ho@windriver.com> 2018-10-19 17:29:11 +0000 07d89cb Merge "OVS: fix memory pool allocation for virtual environment" into r/2018.10 zuul(a)review.openstack.org<mailto:zuul@review.openstack.org> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mirror Update [mirror-downloader][#115] Missing packages. Results report: - Missing: logs/L1_srpms_missing_centos3rdparties.log kernel-rt-3.10.0-862.11.6.rt56.819.el7.src.rpm python2-pysocks-1.6.7-1.el7.noarch.rpm - Missing GPG key ./output/stx-r1/CentOS/pike/Source/libvirt-python-4.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm: RSA sha1 ((MD5) PGP) md5 NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: (MD5) PGP#596bea5d) The team is already taking care of missing packages and manifest update. Regards Cesar Lara Software Engineering Manager OpenSource Technology Center

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build][meetings] build team meeting minutes 10/18/2018
by Lara, Cesar 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Build team meeting 10/17/2018 Attendees Jason, Scott, Saul, Abraham , Memo, Hayde, Marcela, Mario, Chuy, Felipe, Erich, Cesar Agenda - Cengn status for external mirror - Use cases review/discussion - Opens Cengn Status - Waiting for access to bare metal server, once we have access we will start populating the mirror. Use case review/discussion - We will start with mail sent to ML by Jason[1], this will address most use cases coming from WR developers that have been working on StarlingX the most, Mexico team will meet to find a way to implement these use cases in code to feed the Stxb tool, this proposed mapping will be presented in a follow up session. The intention is to start coding necessary pieces in python, but since there is a concern about too many moving pieces in the build scripts , a full analysis is required to avoid losing functionality, that might lead to keep some of the bash scripting as part of the build tools. Opens - New steps required for build process to generate new kubernetes files and configuration, We will keep an eye on this requirement as is not crystal clear today, but we will need to add this in the near future. - Mexico team refactoring download script on python - probably the best one to start with, we might have a couple of efficiencies on this effort. -As part of multiOS effort we are setting up a Koji instance to work with Clear Linux - there are a complete set of extra instructions to make Koji work as a provider for rpms and ISO files, this will require further discussion, next week we will have Victor Rodriguez which is building up Koji for Clear Linux to give us a walk thru of the system and necessary steps to build the OS. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/Build#Use_Cases_for_Stxb Regards Cesar Lara Software Engineering Manager OpenSource Technology Center

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Question - Using 1Gb mem pages
by Perez, Ricardo O 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hello, I'm trying to execute a test, which his goal is to made use of huge pages (2M / 1G) launching a VM. I have already verified the configuration of the controllers GRUB options and we have defined the variable hugepagesz=1G, however, inside the same parameters list, there is a "default_hugepagesz=2M". The default hugepagesz, has been modified to 1G, and the compute has been restarted with no issues. The flavor has been modified, with the following option: " hw:mem_page_size=104875" (1G) page. However when I launch a VM using the modified flavor it creates the VM, but if I check the field values of the VM using " openstack server show <vm_name>". I'm getting the following value for pgsize: wrs-res:topology | node:0, 512MB, pgsize:2M, vcpus:0, pol:sha | So, seems like it's still taking the 2M pagesize instead of the 1G. What I have already tried is to: * Change also the image metadata: hw:mem_page_size=large and also 104875. Result, VM launched successfully, but pgsize value still 2M. * Leave the GRUB default values, and use modified flavor to hw:mem_page_size=104875, launch the VM with ERROR status. * Leave the GRUB default values, and use modified flavor to hw:mem_page_size=2048, launch the VM with success, , pgsize value is 2M, which is expected, ok. * Leave the GRUB default values, and use modified flavor to hw:mem_page_size=small launch the VM with success, , pgsize value is 4k, which is expected, ok. * Leave the GRUB default values, and use modified flavor to hw:mem_page_size=any launch the VM with success, , pgsize value is 2M, which is expected, ok. Could be this an issue trying to use 1G mem pages or do I'm missing some other configuration parameter? Thanks in advance for your help

3 8

[Starlingx-discuss] [Feature] Refactor init/config related non-openstack patches.
by Liu, ZhipengS 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hi all, I'd like you to review the feature spec submitted by me for the topic of refactoring init/config related patches. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612292/ For RPM patches related to adding or changing StarlingX specific systemd service files, configuration files or other types, 1) If they are not overwriting files already delivered by the upstream RPM, refactor and have an specific config rpm that delivers the new file instead of original patch 2) If they need to change files delivered by the upstream RPM, use puppet to change it instead of original patch. Related story is below link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003768 Also attached word version FYI. Thx! -zhipeng

1 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Community Feedbacks for RFE(patch 4ae5a58) for StartlingX upstreaming
by Xu, Chenjie 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hi Matt, For patch 4ae5a58, the RFE “Enable other subprojects to extend l2pop fdb information” has been draft and is under reviewing for now. Community provide some feedbacks and could you please help review and comment！ 1. The link for the RFE is below: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1793653 2. The link for the code is below: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/599319/ 3. The link for the BP mentioned by Slawek is below: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/native-l2pop 4. The link for the RFE related to the BP is below: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1630981 For patch 9f926a5, the RFE “Add l2pop support for floating ip resources” has been draft and is under internal reviewing for now. This RFE depends on the RFE “Enable other subprojects to extend l2pop fdb information” Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] [Feature] Refactor init/config related non-openstack patches.
by Liu, ZhipengS 22 Oct '18

22 Oct '18

Hi all, I'd like you to review the feature spec submitted by me for the topic of refactoring init/config related patches. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612292/ For RPM patches related to adding or changing StarlingX specific systemd service files, configuration files or other types, 1) If they are not overwriting files already delivered by the upstream RPM, refactor and have an specific config rpm that delivers the new file instead of original patch 2) If they need to change files delivered by the upstream RPM, use puppet to change it instead of original patch. Related story is below link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003768 Thx! -zhipeng

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Anybody know how to create project manually in storyboard?
by Fang, Liang A 21 Oct '18

21 Oct '18

Hi I want to do some backport work for stx-cinder, and want to trace the work in storyboard. But stx-cinder project is not in storyboard, do anybody know how to create this? I was told that stx-cinder is not in git.openstack.org, so it has not been created in storyboard automatically. Regards Liang

1 0