July 2019 - Starlingx-discuss - lists.starlingx.io

[Starlingx-discuss] a question about starlingx error handling behavior
by Wang, Yi C 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

Hi Eric, I am working on the LP 1815513<https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1815513>. Based on my tests, if I unplug the cable of active controller for management network for a long time (for example, 30s), and then plug it, the whole system can recover after some reboots. But if I unplug the cable for a short time, and then plug it. The whole system can't recover. I need to lock/unlock controllers manually to bring the system back. So my questions are: 1. Is the behavior acceptable? (recover the system by manual lock/unlock operations) 2. If the answer is no for #1, we need the system to recover automatically. I am not familiar with internal maintenance logics, could you give me some hints? Thanks. Yi

2 6

[Starlingx-discuss] memory reserved for vm not enough
by Xu, YizhouX 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

4 4

[Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190704
by Perez Ibarra, Maria G 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-Jul-04 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190704T01…>) Status: GREEN =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Bare Metal Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs PASS ] =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Virtual Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] Standard - External Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] =========================================== Regards Maria G.

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [ Regression testing - stx2.0 ] Report for 7/04/19
by Perez Ibarra, Maria G 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

StarlingX 2.0 Release Status: ISO: BUILD_ID=" 20190628T013000Z" from (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190628T01…>) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Overall Results: Total = 423 Pass = 185 Fail = 12 Blocked = 17 Total executed = 214 Pass Rate = 86.44% ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Results per Domain: Regression - AIO-SX 23 PASS |1 FAIL|2 BLOCKED Regression - Backup & Restore Regression - Distributed Cloud Regression - Gnoochi 13 PASS Regression - FM Regression - HA Regression - Heat 12 PASS | 1 BLOCKED Regression - Horizon 4 PASS Regression - Install and Config Regression - Maintenance Regression - Networking 75 PASS | 7 FAIL | 7 BLOCKED Regression - Nova 2 PASS Regression - Security 27 PASS | 2 FAIL Regression - Storage Regression - Inventory 23 PASS | 2 FAIL System Test 6 PASS | 7 BLOCKED --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bugs: Controller can't unlock after lock on AIO-SX : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1833472 user does not login within configured time(60s) login is aborted : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1833469 After pull data cable on the compute, no alarm has triggered : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834512 System account doesn't block after invalid login attempts : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1814345 Cannot create instances with SRIOV port : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835318 Instance cannot create with network driver e1000 and rtl8139 : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835300 After stopping neutron-dhcp-agent service no alarm generated: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835440 Containers: lock_host failed on a host with config_drive VM : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821026 200.006 alarm "controller-0 is degraded due to the failure of its 'pci-irq-affinity-agent' process" after reboot : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1832047 Traceback and abort on live migration with cpu realtime : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834077 virsh only listing one volume, even though there was an additional volume attached after instantiation : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834194 3 instances launched in soft anti-affinity server group but unexpectedly ignored the 3rd host : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834255 Device UUID is missing when boot up VM with block device : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835282 stx-openstack apply takes longer time when lock and unlock on standby controller : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834083 Port list was not showing for some computes during install : https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834245 Total Bugs: 15 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- For more detail of the tests: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MoBroFimeQjsJvCC_N_DSLYMQsNZVMzTwAV… Regards! Maria G

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] First Contact SIG (July 4, 2019)
by Zvonar, Bill 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

Apologies for forgetting to send a reminder out before today's call. Today we discussed the historical responsiveness to questions on the mailing list, focusing on those who are looking for help & are more 'new' than others. The results for May are captured on the etherpad [0] under the heading "Mailing List Responsiveness". We'll discuss in next week's community call, comments are welcome here or on the etherpad. Bill... [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-first-contact

1 0

Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Help needed to add patch to openstackclient
by Song Gao song (高松) 04 Jul '19

04 Jul '19

It’s ok! Waiting for the other developers to reply. 发件人: Bailey, Henry Albert (Al) [mailto:Al.Bailey@windriver.com] 发送时间: 2019年7月4日 22:02 收件人: Song Gao song (高松) <gaosong.lc(a)inspur.com>; starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io 主题: RE: Help needed to add patch to openstackclient My mistake, my response was based on the current codebase and release. I don’t know what the procedure is for porting or supporting fixes in older STX releases. Al From: Song Gao song (高松) [mailto:gaosong.lc@inspur.com] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2019 9:27 AM To: Bailey, Henry Albert (Al); starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io <mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: 答复: Help needed to add patch to openstackclient Thanks for your timely response! But, per starlingx 2018.10 how the openstackclient package built, is it built from the repo hosted in starlingx/upstream? And if it’s right, I can make ti straight to commit to upstream. 发件人: Bailey, Henry Albert (Al) [mailto:Al.Bailey@windriver.com] 发送时间: 2019年7月4日 21:13 收件人: Song Gao song (高松) <gaosong.lc(a)inspur.com <mailto:gaosong.lc@inspur.com> >; starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io <mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> 主题: RE: Help needed to add patch to openstackclient Currently the manifest for starlingx openstackclient builds from stable/stein. https://opendev.org/starlingx/manifest/src/branch/master/default.xml#L51 So if your fix is merged in vanilla openstackclient, and back-ported to the stable stein branch, it will get picked up automatically. If you need to temporarily diverge from vanilla openstack, we typically request that the gerrit review be submitted to the openstack community, and then we can temporarily merge it as a patch until the two environments are able to become in sync. We do that with openstack-helm https://opendev.org/starlingx/upstream/src/branch/master/openstack/openstack -helm Al From: Song Gao song (高松) [mailto:gaosong.lc@inspur.com] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2019 8:38 AM To: starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io <mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Help needed to add patch to openstackclient Hi Folks: What is the steps to add patch to openstackclient for stx.1.0. Currently we have some problems with the openstack cli, and already find solutions, but stuck in the commit steps. Any help will be appreciated! Best Regards Song.Gao

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [StarlingX] Regardings magnum service on latest stx version
by lilong-neu＠neusoft.com 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

Hello StarlingX guys, we have confirmed magnum service at latest stx version many times which derectly failed to run. so we supposed that the new version of starlingx does not support the magnum service and may be replaced by other services. According to the current situation, if magnum is no longer maintained in the new version of starlingx, it is recommended to close the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820324 Could you give some suggestions? others: we tried to configure magnum in the starlingx (2019/06/26) environment, according to the official website(https://docs.openstack.org/magnum/latest/install/install-rdo.html#t…, after installation When the related service is prompted, there is no corresponding download resource. The log is as follows: --------------------- controller-0:~$ sudo yum install openstack-magnum-api openstack-magnum-conductor python-magnumclient Password: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile base | 3.6 kB 00:00:00 extras | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 updates | 3.4 kB 00:00:00 No package openstack-magnum-api available. No package openstack-magnum-conductor available. Nothing to do --------------------- ---------------------------------------- Neusoft Corporation Neusoft Group (Dalian) Co., Ltd. No. 901 Huangpu Road, Dalian 116085, PRC Website: www.neusoft.com Mobile: (86) 15840916693 Tel：(86 0411) 8483 2794 E-mail: lilong-neu(a)neusoft.com --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from your system. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3 3

Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Ceph validation execution progress 96% PASSED, 1 TC BLOCKED by LP1827119/LP1828262.
by Xie, Cindy 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

Fernando, Great progress! I am copying this nice report to the mailing list. :) Thx. - cindy From: Hernandez Gonzalez, Fernando Sent: Thursday, July 4, 2019 4:59 AM To: 'Poncea, Ovidiu' <Ovidiu.Poncea(a)windriver.com>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie(a)intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales(a)intel.com>; 'Waheed, Numan' <Numan.Waheed(a)windriver.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones(a)intel.com>; Chen, Tingjie <tingjie.chen(a)intel.com>; Hu, Yong <yong.hu(a)intel.com>; 'Badea, Daniel' <Daniel.Badea(a)windriver.com>; Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen(a)intel.com>; Miller, Frank <Frank.Miller(a)windriver.com> Subject: Ceph validation execution progress 96% PASSED, 1 TC BLOCKED by LP1827119/LP1828262. Hi All, Today I am happy to announce that we are almost done with Ceph validation, there is one single test case (STOR_FS_033) blocked and waiting to be ran, all other are now 96% PASSED. STOR_FS_033 - BLOCKED 2 issues reported related to this functionality, one Gerrit review in process, we will keep it blocked for now https://review.opendev.org/#/c/661900/ https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1827119 (In Progress) https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1828262 (In Progress) # DOMAIN TEST CASE PRIORITY RESULT 1 Ceph/tier STOR_TIER_005 1 Pass 2 Ceph/tier STOR_TIER_006 1 Pass 3 Ceph/tier STOR_TIER_007 1 Pass 4 Ceph/tier STOR_TIER_008 1 Pass 5 Ceph/factor STOR_REPF_009 2 Pass 6 Ceph/Swiftenabled STOR_SWIFT_010 2 Pass 7 Ceph/cephmon STOR_PROCESS_011 1 Pass 8 Ceph/ceph-osd STOR_PROCESS_012 1 Pass 9 Ceph STOR_SCALABILITY_013 2 Pass 10 Ceph/cephmon STOR_CORE_014 2 Pass 11 Ceph/cephmon STOR_CORE_015 2 Pass 12 Ceph/cephmon STOR_CORE_016 2 Pass 13 Ceph/journals STOR_JOUR_017 2 Pass 14 Ceph/ceph-osd STOR_HW_018 1 Pass 15 Ceph/journals STOR_HW_019 2 Pass 16 Ceph/recovery STOR_DOR_022 2 Pass 17 Ceph/recovery STOR_FAULT_023 1 Pass 18 Ceph/pools STOR_FS_024 2 Deferred 19 Ceph STOR_PROF_029 2 Pass 20 Ceph/partitions STOR_PART_030 1 Pass 21 Ceph/ceph-mon STOR_FS_033 2 Block 22 Ceph/ceph-mgr-api STOR_IOPATH 2 Pass 23 Ceph/pools STOR_POOL 2 Pass 24 Ceph/RESTFUL STOR_RESTFUL 2 Pass 25 Ceph/rbd STOR_RBD 2 Pass 26 Ceph/snapshots STOR_RBD_SNAPSHOT 2 Pass Thanks Fernando Hernandez Gonzalez Cloud Software Engineer Avenida del Bosque #1001 Col, El Bajío Zapopan, Jalisco MX, 45019 ____________________________________ Office: +52.33.16.45.01.34 inet 86450134

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [docs][meetings] docs team meeting minutes 7/3/2019
by Tullis, Michael L 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

For notes and new action items from our docs team meeting today, see our etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-documentation Join us if you have interest in StarlingX docs! We meet Wednesdays, and call logistics are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Starlingx/Meetings. -- Mike

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [Containers] Sanity Test - ISO 20190703
by Perez Ibarra, Maria G 03 Jul '19

03 Jul '19

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2019-Jul-03 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190703T01…>) Status: GREEN =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Bare Metal Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs PASS ] =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Virtual Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs PASS ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs PASS ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] Standard - External Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs PASS ] =========================================== Regards Maria G.

1 0