January 2020 - Starlingx-discuss

[Starlingx-discuss] Agenda: Weekly StarlingX non-OpenStack distro meeting, 1/15/2020
by Sun, Austin 14 Jan '20

14 Jan '20

Hi All: Agenda for 1/15 meeting: * stx.4.0 feature - Standardize Flock Package Versioning (JITStack-Daniels) - CentOS 8.0 upgrade planning (Shuai Zhao) Srpms: tarball: container builder and iso status: openstack rpm for centos8: * Unit Test for non-openstack project (Brainstorming) * Open Thanks. BR Austin Sun. _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Ansible bootstrap playbook error
by Daolin Liu 14 Jan '20

14 Jan '20

Hi, I'm a rookie and this is the first time I study and install Starlingx (I have never used K8S and Openstack before). I am following the steps from: https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r2_release/virtual/aio_simp… I encountered an issue when I run "Ansible bootstrap playbook". After I copy /usr/share/ansible/stx-ansible/playbooks/bootstrap/host_vars/default.yml to $HOME/localhost.yml, and change some values in it, especially the registry k8s.gcr.io url to aliyun (since it can not pull image in China), I got below errors for kubelet init: [kubelet-check] Initial timeout of 40s passed. [kubelet-check] It seems like the kubelet isn't running or healthy. [kubelet-check] The HTTP call equal to 'curl -sSL http://localhost:10248/healthz' failed with error: Get http://localhost:10248/healthz: dial tcp [::1]:10248: connect: connection refused. and some more information like this: Unfortunately, an error has occurred: timed out waiting for the condition This error is likely caused by: - The kubelet is not running - The kubelet is unhealthy due to a misconfiguration of the node in some way (required cgroups disabled) If you are on a systemd-powered system, you can try to troubleshoot the error with the following commands: - 'systemctl status kubelet' - 'journalctl -xeu kubelet' Can someone give me any clues? Thanks, Daolin

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] StarlingX Distro.OpenStack Bi-weekly Meeting - WW03'2020
by Yong Hu 14 Jan '20

14 Jan '20

A reminder that there will be a meeting this week on Tuesday Jan 14. The 2 main topics will be: 1. Discuss a PR [0] for Stx.2.0 CVE fix on stx-nava staging. @Dean, @Brent and @Shuicheng please join this topic. 2. Review OpenStack Service Upgrade from "Train" to "Ussuri" for stx.4.0 release. @Kunpeng and @Chant from 99Cloud and @Zhipeng, please update on this task. 3. Review LPs on distro.openstack [1] if we still have time 4. Open If you have additional topics please add them to the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-distro-openstack-meetings [0] https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-nova/pull/27 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bugs?field.tag=stx.distro.openstack Thanks, Yong

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 381 - Still Failing!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 14 Jan '20

14 Jan '20

Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 381 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20200114T000000Z Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20200114T00… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_repo_sync_layered - Build # 29 - Failure!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Project: STX_repo_sync_layered Build #: 29 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20200113T212454Z Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20200… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BRANCH: master MANIFEST: flock.xml PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20200… PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20200113T212356Z/logs MY_REPO_ROOT: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-flock

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test - ISO 20200111
by Perez Ibarra, Maria G 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso from 2020-January-11 (link<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20200111T02…>) Status: GREEN =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Bare Metal Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ] Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ] =========================================== Sanity Test is executed in a Containers - Virtual Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ] Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ] These results were tested in the last iso 01-11-2020 regards Maria G

1 0

Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Test Hack-a-thon Etherpad...
by Peters, Matt 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Hi Mingyuan, Additional tasks can be added if individual commits will be used for each of the public methods. -Matt On 2020-01-12, 10:24 PM, "Qi, Mingyuan" <mingyuan.qi(a)intel.com> wrote: Hi Bart, The statement in task AppOperator of sysinv SB prefers adding tests for one method in each commit, while the etherpad shows "use a single commit for each Storyboard Task". Does it mean each test for each method in AppOperator class needs a task created in SB 2007082 respectively? What's the best practice of this operation? (or create tasks in a separate SB?) Mingyuan -----Original Message----- From: Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar(a)windriver.com> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 22:15 To: starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Test Hack-a-thon Etherpad... Hi folks - the etherpad for the Test Hack-a-thon is open at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-test-hackathon. More details to be added, but as discussed in the Community Call yesterday, we'll use this to keep track of who's working on what. Please indicate which areas/tasks you will work on in the list on the etherpad. Let's get hacking! Bill... _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss(a)lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Test Hack-a-thon Etherpad...
by Zvonar, Bill 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Hi folks - the etherpad for the Test Hack-a-thon is open at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-test-hackathon. More details to be added, but as discussed in the Community Call yesterday, we'll use this to keep track of who's working on what. Please indicate which areas/tasks you will work on in the list on the etherpad. Let's get hacking! Bill...

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Discuss about one VM evacuation failure issue
by Liu, ZhipengS 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Hi Bart, I have been working on one OpenStack related LP below. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1857462 You can get detail information in LP comments. Root cause was found after analyzed related log, it seems need a fix in NFV side. As you are NFV expert, I'd like to get your comment before I can work out the solution. Thanks! zhipeng

2 2

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] STX_build_master_master - Build # 380 - Still Failing!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 13 Jan '20

13 Jan '20

Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 380 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20200113T000000Z Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20200113T00… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false

1 0