December 2020 - Starlingx-discuss

[Starlingx-discuss] [stable] [build-report] STX_build_docker_flock_images - Build # 303 - Still Failing!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

Project: STX_build_docker_flock_images Build #: 303 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20201208T022320Z Branch: Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters WEB_HOST: mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca MY_WORKSPACE: /localdisk/loadbuild/jenkins/master-containers/20201208T014249Z OS: centos MY_REPO: /localdisk/designer/jenkins/master-containers/cgcs-root BASE_VERSION: master-stable-20201208T014249Z PUBLISH_LOGS_URL: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/… REGISTRY_USERID: slittlewrs LATEST_PREFIX: master PUBLISH_LOGS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20201208T014249Z/logs PUBLISH_TIMESTAMP: 20201208T014249Z FLOCK_VERSION: master-centos-stable-20201208T014249Z WEB_HOST_PORT: 80 PREFIX: master TIMESTAMP: 20201208T014249Z BUILD_STREAM: stable REGISTRY_ORG: starlingx PUBLISH_OUTPUTS_BASE: /export/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/containers/20201208T014249Z/outputs REGISTRY: docker.io

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Query on Patch merge
by N, Poornima Y 11 Dec '20

11 Dec '20

Hi all, I have uploaded following patches on the opendev gerrit server. Even though I have got +2 I see that the patch status is still "Merge If Necessary". Can anyone help what needs to be done here to get these patches merged? 1. https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/specs/+/750636 2. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/765494 Thanks and Regards, Poornima

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Master Test LAYERED build ISO 20201209T154905Z
by Dimofte, Alexandru 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Sanity Test from 2020-December-9 (http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20201… ) Status: GREEN Helm-Chart used: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/flock/20201… =========================================== Sanity Test executed on Bare Metal AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ] Standard - Local Storage (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ] Standard External - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ] =========================================== Sanity Test executed on Virtual Environment AIO - Simplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ] AIO - Duplex Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ] Standard (2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ] Standard External Storage (2+2+2) Setup 04 TCs [PASS] Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS] Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS] Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS] TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ] Regards, STX Validation Team [Logo Description automatically generated] Dimofte Alexandru Software Engineer STARLINGX TEAM Skype no: +40 336403734 Personal Mobile: +40 743167456 alexandru.dimofte(a)intel.com<mailto:alexandru.dimofte@intel.com> Intel Romania

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] f/centos8 STX_build_centos8_master - Build # 53 - Still Failing!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Project: STX_build_centos8_master Build #: 53 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20201210T100001Z Branch: f/centos8 Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/feature/centos8/centos/mo… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_master_master - Build # 763 - Still Failing!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Project: STX_build_master_master Build #: 763 Status: Still Failing Timestamp: 20201210T053001Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/monolithic/… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: false FORCE_BUILD: true

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] Starlingx Ironic Bare metal partitioned-disk image issue
by Akki yadav 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hi Team, Hope you all are doing good. I have a Standard Starlingx R4.0 with ironic setup up and running. I have launched a Bare metal with whole-disk image and it came up flawlessly. But when I was trying to launch a bare metal node with partitioned-disk image, It gave me an error in the ironic-conductor stating that "sgdisk: not found". Then steps I did to resolve it are: 1. Then I installed "gdisk" on both containers of ironic-conductor . (i.e. ironic-conductor-0 and ironic-conductor-1). 2. Now, I tried agin to launch a bare metal node, this time it failed stating "parted : not found". 3. Then I installed "parted" on both containers of ironic-conductor . (i.e. ironic-conductor-0 and ironic-conductor-1). 4. Now I can flawlessly launch bare metal node with partitioned-disk image. Now, I wanted to know how may I get these packages (gdisk and parted) already installed in ironic-conductor containers when the stx-openstack application gets applied ? Regards Akshay

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] Regarding Ironic integration with networking service
by Amit Mahajan 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hi All, As per OpenStack Ironic documentation, it is recommended to install bare-metal ML2 mechanism driver and L2 agent (ironic-neutron-agent) for proper integration with the Networking service, but on the StarlingX setup that we have deployed with Ironic, we do not see "baremetal" set in mechanism_drivers in ml2_conf.ini. Also, there is no kubernetes pod in openstack namespace running ironic-neutron-agent. Is there any specific reason that integration of Ironic with networking service for routed networks is not supported in StarlingX Ironic deployment? Regards, Amit

2 1

[Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] master STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master - Build # 383 - Failure!
by build.starlingx＠gmail.com 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Project: STX_build_layer_compiler_master_master Build #: 383 Status: Failure Timestamp: 20201210T023001Z Branch: master Check logs at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/compiler/20… -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parameters FULL_BUILD: false FORCE_BUILD: false

1 0

[Starlingx-discuss] [CentOS8] build-pkgs/build-iso completed successfully, but installer reports dependency issues
by Bai, Haiqing 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hi, all: Is there anyone knows why "build-pkgs" and "build-iso" completed successfully and bootimage.iso created, but the target installer has below errors: (I have checked that "python36" and "python36-devel" are in dist/comps.xml and the type is "mandatory" of group ID "platform-controller", "platform-controller-worker", "platform-controller-worker-lowlatency", and the kickstarts cfg files include the related group in "%packages" ). Thanks. ======================================== Error The following software marked for installation has errors. This is likely caused by an error with your installation source. Problem 1: package patch-alarm-1.0-2.tis.x86_64 requires python3-devel, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - package python36-devel-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is excluded Problem 2: package grubby-8.40-34.el8.tis.1.x86_64 requires python3-devel, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - package python36-devel-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is excluded Problem 3: package cgcs-patch-1.0-28.tis.x86_64 requires python3-devel, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - package python36-devel-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is excluded Problem 4: package worker-utils-1.0-5.tis.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/python3, but none of the providers can be installed - package worker-utils-1.0-5.tis.x86_64 requires python3, but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - package python36-3.6.8-2.module_el8.1.0+245+c39af44f.x86_64 is excluded Press ENTER to continue:

3 3

[Starlingx-discuss] proposal for lifecycle operator
by Chen, Haochuan Z 10 Dec '20

10 Dec '20

Hi Bob I study patch for lifecycle operator. Something to check with you https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22story_2007960%22+(status:open%20OR%20… 1, lifecycle operator will merge in r5 release or not? 2, propose to add a hook for APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST. Now there is only hook for constants.APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMING_PRE, which is called before application apply. Propose to add a hook to be called, after application apply, APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST. Thanks! Martin, Chen IOTG, Software Engineer 021-61164330

2 2