Hi Juan Carlos, You had asked "Do you know how to make the controller-0 enabled and available again in order to perform the controller swact?". In this case I believe you would need to collect and provide logs since the condition described has the appearance of a defect - one does not expect the controller to go disabled/offline due to swact. I did not observe an existing bug report, so you could double-check and create one. M On Thu, 2019-01-03 at 19:35 +0000, Alonso, Juan Carlos wrote:
Hello, I performed a controller swact, controller-1 become the active, then controller-0 went to disable and offline and I could not perform the swact again. I have this output from system host-list: +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+ | id | hostname | personality | administrative | operational | availability | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+ | 1 | controller-0 | controller | unlocked | disabled | offline | | 2 | controller-1 | controller | unlocked | enabled | available | +----+--------------+-------------+----------------+-------------+--- -----------+ Do you know how to make the controller-0 enabled and available again in order to perform the controller swact? Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss