On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:50 PM Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> wrote:
I’d like to close out the Docs mega spec review this week. Thank you to all of the reviewers. I believe I have addressed all of your comments. If I have not, please let me know. More reviews are welcome, of course.
I still have a couple outstanding questions that were part of the reviews but are easy to miss. :) * Is multi-region a thing in STX? Will we be doing both distributed cloud and multi-region? There's a fairly long history of the term "multi-region" in openstack and I'm wondering if that is the same thing or not? * Can we point to upstream docs for things like provider networks? * Overall, if we did all this documentation, which is fairly aggressive in a good way, a lot of it would be valuable upstream. Does it make sense to try to work with openstack docs? I think it would be useful to get other people introduced to StarlingX and help to show how STX relates to OpenStack. The multi-region question is really more me trying to understand what the project is doing, ie. if we aren't actually doing both then we don't need to document both. Otherwise I like the direction and am happy to add my +2. Thanks for all your effort in this. :) Thanks, Curtis
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/635641/
brucej _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
-- Blog: serverascode.com