On 5/6/19 10:46 AM, Wensley, Barton wrote:
Saul,
One drawback with using admin is it may cause some confusion with the identically named OpenStack admin user. How about "stxadmin" instead? Is there a concern with using "stx" in the user name?
Yes, there is concern about using stx in the name, as mentioned in my initial email we want to avoid stx, root, starlingx, it should remain generic. I think the same concern of using wrs in the name, it might obsucre or not be meaningful. Sau!
Bart
-----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: May 3, 2019 6:28 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
Folks,
We talked about some of the branding changes at the PTG just now and one item to try and tackle now for this release would be changing wrsroot to some alternative.
This will be a pretty mechanical change, it will touch the integ, config, metal, and update repos. There might be a couple places where this can be placed in a variable or parameter. There is currently a storyboard titled "Change wrsroot to stxuser" [0]. There was some initial discussion at the PTG regarding the new user name. We want to avoid stx, or starlingx and "root", in the name it should remain more generic.
One obvious choice is:
admin
Please reply with additional suggestions before next week's TSC (5/9).
Ultimately, this change will require changes to tests, test frameworks, scripts (such as deployment tools) and documentation.
[0] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004716
Thanks for your input.
Sau!
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss