This seems like a lot of core reviewers for a repo … almost looks like the whole team 😉.

I think we typically aim for 2-4 core reviewers … or maybe 10-20% of contributors.

If the # of core reviewers is approximately the whole team, it sort of defeats the purpose of the core reviewer.

Greg.

 

From: Roy, Christian via Starlingx-discuss <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2025 4:18 PM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Cc: Jaywant, Ashish <Ashish.Jaywant@windriver.com>; Valavil, Suhailath <Suhailath.Valavil@windriver.com>; Thomas, Sunil <Sunil.Thomas@windriver.com>; Kapur, Sandeep <Sandeep.Kapur@windriver.com>; Carvalho, Thiago Ribeiro <ThiagoRibeiro.Carvalho@windriver.com>; Guntaka, Umashankar Reddy <UmashankarGuntaka.Reddy@windriver.com>; Jaiswal, Abhishek <Abhishek.Jaiswal@windriver.com>; Satapathy, Durga Prasad <DurgaPrasad.Satapathy@windriver.com>; Peng, Peng <Peng.Peng@windriver.com>
Subject: Core Reviewer Nominations for starlingx/test

 

CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Based on their contributions to starlingx/test and participation in the Code Review training, I would like to nominate the following individuals as core reviewers to starlingx/test:

 

Ashish Jaywant

Suhailath Valavil

Sunil Thomas

Sandeep Kapur

Thiago Ribeiro Carvalho

Umashankar Reddy Guntaka

Abhishek Jaiswal

Durga Prasad Satapathy

Peng Peng

 

Thanks,

Christian