Any one else with any concerns over discontinuing container builds from r/stx.7.0 ?
As Thales mentioned, we have the official release container images built and tagged in r/stx.7.0 .
So this would only impact someone building stx 7 “AND” requiring container images to be rebuilt … probably a small chance.
Plus, as previously mentioned, STX 7 is EOL in September.
Any last concerns ? … before we discontinue container builds in stx 7 ?
Greg.
From: Scott Kamp <scott.kamp@xunison.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 7:26 PM
To: Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines@windriver.com>; Cervi, Thales Elero <ThalesElero.Cervi@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
no we are not...
Thanks,
Scott
From: Waines, Greg <Greg.Waines@windriver.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 11:53 PM
To: Cervi, Thales Elero <ThalesElero.Cervi@windriver.com>;
starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
Scott Kamp ? (or anyone else)
Can you comment on whether you are building STX 7 that would require container builds ?
Greg.
From: Cervi, Thales Elero <ThalesElero.Cervi@windriver.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 2:55 PM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
Hi Scott,
>From my point of view, since we already have the official release images built and tagged, I don't see why not to discontinue container builds from r/stx.7.0.
This would only affect re-builds of our older branch and apparently to maintain that code base is starting to become a problematic task without any rewards if no one is needing those docker images to be re-build.
I would agree with discontinuing it.
Thales
From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2023 10:52 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [build-report] r/stx.7.0 STX_7.0_build_layer_containers - Build # 37 - Still Failing!
Branch r/stx.7.0 can build ISO's, but container builds remain broken on
stx-nova.
stx-nova's issues started with spice-html5. The first issue was
spice-html5's github repo, forcing a move to gitlab's copy of the
spice-html5. The move to gitlab went smoothly for debian (master and
r/stx.8.0), but is failing to clone from r/stx.7.0 centos. It appears
gitlab requires a newer version git. Centos is using version 1.8.x.
Debain is using a version 2.x.x.
r/stx.7.0 needs to find a way to inject a newer version of git into the
Loci CentOS container that stx-nova is based on.
The alternative is to discontinue contained builds from r/stx.7.0
Thoughts?
Scott
On 2023-05-21 06:41, starlingx.build@gmail.com wrote:
> CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
>
> Project: STX_7.0_build_layer_containers
> Build #: 37
> Status: Still Failing
> Timestamp: 20230521T051649Z
> Branch: r/stx.7.0
>
> Check logs at:
>
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/7.0/centos/containers/20230521T051649Z/logs
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Parameters
>
> BUILD_CONTAINERS_DEV: false
> BUILD_CONTAINERS_STABLE: true
> FORCE_BUILD: true
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io