+1 sysadmin On 2019-05-07, 10:59 AM, "Ngo, Tee" <Tee.Ngo@windriver.com> wrote: +1 for sysadmin, generic, clear and concise. -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: May-07-19 10:53 AM To: Penney, Don; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 7:37 AM, Penney, Don wrote: > 3 characters ;) > ENOTAWAKE! Alex suggested shortening admin -> adm, good thought sysadm deployadm cloudadm edgeadm A rif on Controller: ctrladm conadm Trying new terms! Sau! > -----Original Message----- > From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM > To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal > > > > On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote: >> I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :) >> > It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the > account. > > Just saying, no vote yet from me.. > > Sau! > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Shuquan Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan@99cloud.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 3:44 AM >> To: Saul Wold >> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal >> >> sysadmin +1 >> >> On May 7, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 5/6/19 2:43 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote: >>> What about 'deployadmin' ? >> That's an interesting alternative. >> >> Sau! >> >>> Regards, >>> José >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jim Somerville [mailto:jim.somerville@windriver.com] >>>> Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:08 PM >>>> To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer@gmail.com>; Wensley, Barton >>>> <Barton.Wensley@windriver.com> >>>> Cc: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >>>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 2019-05-06 2:32 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote: >>>>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton >>>>> <Barton.Wensley@windriver.com> wrote: >>>>>> I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously >>>> "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use >>>> the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...). >>>>> >>>>> The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is >>>>> because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not >>>>> want to do again. >>>>> >>>>> 'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to >>>>> not cause confusion there. Unless it has other similar uses >>>>> 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better >>>>> suggestion. >>>> >>>> Just to be devil's advocate here, sysadmin could easily already be in use on a >>>> future port of this stuff to another platform. >>>> >>>> From a security standpoint, it would be on an easily guessed list of userids for >>>> black hat penetration testing. >>>> >>>> It also shows up on the Big Username Blacklist. >>>> >>>> https://github.com/marteinn/The-Big-Username- >>>> Blacklist/blob/master/list_raw.txt >>>> >>>> -Jim >>>> >>>>> >>>>> dt >>>>> >>>>> Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :) >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>>> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >>>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >>> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> _______________________________________________ >> Starlingx-discuss mailing list >> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io >> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss