Thanks Mario for the update. Please continue the integration & testing for the FM chart w/ Armada system for those pending patches. You can share the test cases to the community as well so we can have a review. For the tasks still "todo", when you think we can upload initial patches? Or you are not working on those for now? Just need to know the ETA for those. Mingyuan is interested but he is still working on Ironic so we may still need to rely on you for FM at this moment. Thanks. - cindy -----Original Message----- From: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 11:00 AM To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; Arce Moreno, Abraham <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Tao Liu <tao.liu@windriver.com>; Frank.Miller@windriver.com; Botello Ortega, Luis <luis.botello.ortega@intel.com> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Hi Cindy, Actually, Luis and me have had some issues related to the integration of the FM chart with armada system in some local tests, I have been working on some patches updates to solve this. Right now I am creating an ISO image from scratch with these patches in order to test them in a clean environment. At this moment I would like to focus on this issue during the rest of the week and I will continue with the other patches related to horizon and another one about the implementation of the PUT method for the FM restful API.. At this moment my progress in the pending patches is research, however if there are someone interested about these pending patches, let me know. Thank you for your attention. Best regards. Mario. ________________________________________ From: Xie, Cindy Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2019 4:12 PM To: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C; Arce Moreno, Abraham; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Tao Liu; Frank.Miller@windriver.com; Botello Ortega, Luis Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Hi, Mario, I see that you made very good progress in uploading several patches against SB#2004008 - anything needs help for the remaining 3 tasks so far? Thx. - cindy -----Original Message----- From: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 3:38 AM To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; Arce Moreno, Abraham <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Tao Liu <tao.liu@windriver.com>; Frank.Miller@windriver.com; Botello Ortega, Luis <luis.botello.ortega@intel.com> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Hi Cindy, The first version of the patches will take around 2 weeks, after that, a validation step will start. In this step I am going to update the patches according to the feedback received from the community and Luis Botello will help to validate the functionality of the patches. As final step, I would like to execute the sanity when all patches are reviewed by the community an they are ready to be merged. This final step could vary around 2-3 weeks, it will depend on the response time from the community and the complexity of the required updates, in addition to the validation tasks. Best regards. Mario. ________________________________________ From: Xie, Cindy Sent: Monday, March 25, 2019 5:44 PM To: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C; Arce Moreno, Abraham; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Tao Liu; Frank.Miller@windriver.com Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Mario, Nice to know that you're getting all information and having better understanding for the tasks. We probably needs to get a little bit more detail granularity of your plan, for each task in the storyboard: - when the patches will be uploaded for review; - what tests you're planning to do? Any support required from Ada's team? and when... - when you expect the patch review comments can be addressed and patch merged to master. Thanks. - cindy -----Original Message----- From: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C [mailto:mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 8:38 AM To: Arce Moreno, Abraham <abraham.arce.moreno@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Tao Liu <tao.liu@windriver.com>; Frank.Miller@windriver.com Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Hi team, Thank you for your feedback from our last meeting, and this is my update. I am checking all points described in this thread. Actually I have got progress in the topic related to snmp and the relation with oamcontroller, sysinv and cgts-client. I plan to send a PR with information about findings/architecture to the stx-fault/doc in a future. I think, it is not necessary another meeting as it was mentioned, I think I have enough information to continue and I am going to update the current reviews and send news according to the points discussed until today, and contact Tao for specific questions. Thanks Tao, Abraham and Frank. Best regards. Mario. ________________________________________ From: Arce Moreno, Abraham Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 10:37 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Arevalo, Mario Alfredo C; Tao Liu Subject: Fault Management Containerization (SB 2004008) Follow Up Thanks Frank for setting this up. Thanks everyone for your attendance to this meeting, here you have high level notes and ToDos based in the topics covered. In Summary - The presentation Stx-Fault/Containers is located at [0]. - Tao will kindly update the Fault Management architecture diagram, slide 8. - Mario will send an email no later than Monday afternoon with the latest findings / questions based in his 5 ToDos. - We will meet again on Tuesday to finalize on tasks and implementation details. If we are forgetting about any key point in this email, please do not hesitate to reply. StarlingX Architecture - 2 instances for each of the following projects: - Keystone - Horizon - Barbican - Fault Management will have 2 instances as well. Fault Management Architecture - [ToDo] [Tao] to modify the Fault Management architecture (Slide 8) Thanks Tao! - fm-api runs in compute node, snmp provide interfaces - [ToDo] [Mario] to check these statements Fault Management REST API - [ToDo] [Mario] to write the next level of details for REST API mapping / implementation, consider to include PUT to Event Log. Fault Management Architecture - python-fmclient is a wrapper to fm_cli / fm_api - [ToDo] [Mario] to understand more about fm_cli as a wrapper and how does it interact and affects fault management containerized strategy. FM Proposal - Remove mysql, fm-api, fm-common - [ToDo] [Mario] to understand about the removal of fm-api and fm-common from the containerized instance. - Dependency to cgts-client - [ToDo] [Mario] to understand what is cgtc-client and how does it interacts with fault management and the new containerized instance. OpenStack Applications The following 2 projects will make use of the Fault Management containerized: - starlingx-dashboard - stx-nfv [0] https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1_vG83aHTToXlIdJxaJpVL-MHWfRGnxLuyEdF... _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss