Agreed that increased docker fs is not documented well … especially if you need to increase the cgts_vg logical volume group in order to increase the docker filesystem size. We have plans to fix this. Greg. From: open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2021 10:30 AM To: Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Finally managed to deploy OpenStack but not sure what caused the issue. Increased disk capacity for docker in worker and reviewed network. On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:59 PM open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn@gmail.com>> wrote: I managed to deploy stx-monitoring that require labelling only in controller nodes. Definitely something wrong with worker-0 labelling On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 8:52 PM open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn@gmail.com>> wrote: Here is more information about the issue. http://paste.openstack.org/show/806872/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/806872/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IqDey86XgSsb-XFryEq6evajkKBtzO0iqfvrTOhcD3HlCvV9FgK4c5QV8wSfkRJp74Y$> Then I set the openstack-compute-node label to the controller-0 and re-apply stx-openstack (just to test). Then stx-openstack applying progress continued up to 55%. I can lock/unlcok the worker-0 via controller nodes. So, it should not be a problem with management network. On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 4:40 PM open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn@gmail.com>> wrote: thank you Bill and Thiago. Now I have switched to Release 5. Don't we need to set following labels for release 5 deployment if we supposed to deploy stx-openstack? for controllers: system host-label-assign $NODE openstack-control-plane=enabled For worker nodes: system host-label-assign $NODE openstack-compute-node=enabled system host-label-assign $NODE openvswitch=enabled Because these labels are not visible in the release 5 installation guide. On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:11 PM Zvonar, Bill <Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com<mailto:Bill.Zvonar@windriver.com>> wrote: Hi again Danishka, we discussed this too. It was suggested that you check /var/logs/armada to see if there are any Armada startup logs that’d help understand what’s going on. Thanks, Bill... From: open infra <openinfradn@gmail.com<mailto:openinfradn@gmail.com>> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 2021 2:28 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] stx-openstack application applying failed [Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address] Hi, I have deployed StarlingX R4 (bare metal dedicated storage installation). stx-openstack application applying was failed. When I retrieve openstack pods, I can see the status osh-openstack-garbd-garbd-7d4957d9f4-kz95v is pending. I have re-uploaded stx-openstack but the same results. I highly appreciate it if someone can help to fix resolve this matter as we have a demo next week. More details available here. describe pod osh-openstack-garbd-garbd http://paste.openstack.org/show/805587/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/805587/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IP_slcx9_D_pSzhjpom6niaG_xdFTyB63HZ2yV5p24SAYzk2f4dmWqMTpvLFhtiucGoh$> describe nodes http://paste.openstack.org/show/805589/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/paste.openstack.org/show/805589/__;!!AjveYdw8EvQ!IP_slcx9_D_pSzhjpom6niaG_xdFTyB63HZ2yV5p24SAYzk2f4dmWqMTpvLFht7VU1um$> Regards, Danishka