On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:59 PM Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
We are likely going have more contributions that fall into experimental that the community may want to try.
Should we have a contrib or experimental repo or subdirectory in stx-tools for these contributions?
My experience with this sort of thing is over time they bit-rot and are slowly, if at all, updated, much like many wikis. There is also a perception of blessing by the project when hosted in project-controlled places, be it a git repo or a subdirectory within another project.[0] The bar for anyone to host their own workspaces publicly is fantastically low these days, with Github, Gitlab, BitBucket and friends all available for free. I see that discovery is one of the issues here, we could host a directory of these repos centrally (wiki page?). What is the benefit of placing arbitrary code into a StarlingX repo over a personal Github account + having a directory listing these personal repos? I see a benefit in the legitimization that putting it under an stx repo gives (this one of my concerns), what are the other benefits? I would feel much better about doing this in an stx repo if the core group (there will be a limited group of people with merge permissions here, yes?) has the responsibility to curate the content of a contrib repo. dt [0] We have already seen this ourselves around some of the scripts in stx-tools/deployment that were put there for a specific purpose and users discovered them and expected them to be supported. -- Dean Troyer dtroyer@gmail.com