Scott, I assume you meant to provide a link to this load:
http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/5.0/centos/flock/20210514T224518Z/outputs/iso/
From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2021 2:58 PM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Problem with STX 5.0 builds from CENGN
We have a valid iso. The build was time stamp 20210514T224518Z
We do NOT yet have a successful build of the docker images
The failed images are:
stx-openstackclients
stx-placement
stx-platformclients
stx-vault-manager
On 2021-05-15 2:41 p.m., Scott Little wrote:
I can confirm the build is now using the intended branch.
The following packages were 'rolled back' to these earlier versions ...
cgts-client-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm
cgts-client-wheels-1.0-219.tis.x86_64.rpm
collectd-extensions-1.0-0.tis.60.x86_64.rpm
controllerconfig-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm
controllerconfig-wheels-1.0-249.tis.x86_64.rpm
distributedcloud-client-dcmanagerclient-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-client-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.30.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dccommon-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcdbsync-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcmanager-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-dcorch-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
distributedcloud-wheels-1.0.0-1.tis.259.noarch.rpm
fm-api-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-api-doc-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-api-wheels-1.0-38.tis.x86_64.rpm
fm-doc-1.0-36.tis.x86_64.rpm
io-scheduler-1.0-2.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-common-dev-1.0-139.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-debuginfo-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-dev-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-hostw-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-hwmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-lmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
mtce-pmon-1.0-199.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-client-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-common-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-plugins-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-tools-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-vim-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
nfv-wheels-1.0-179.tis.x86_64.rpm
pam-config-1.0-7.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-extracfgs-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-kickstarts-pxeboot-1.0.0-161.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-controller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-noncontroller-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
platform-util-wheels-1.0-53.tis.noarch.rpm
playbookconfig-1.0-518.tis.x86_64.rpm
puppet-manifests-1.0.0-754.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-cert-manager-wheels-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-nginx-ingress-controller-wheels-1.0-1.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-oidc-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-oidc-wheels-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-openstack-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-openstack-wheels-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-portieris-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-portieris-wheels-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-ptp-notification-wheels-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-rook-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-rook-wheels-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-vault-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm
python-k8sapp-vault-wheels-20.06-17.tis.noarch.rpm
sm-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm
sm-debuginfo-1.0.0-41.tis.x86_64.rpm
starlingx-dashboard-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm
starlingx-dashboard-wheels-1.0-260.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-cert-manager-helm-1.0-15.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-oidc-auth-helm-1.0-43.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-openstack-helm-1.0-82.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-portieris-helm-1.0-19.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-ptp-notification-helm-1.0-38.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-rook-ceph-1.0-5.tis.noarch.rpm
stx-vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm
sysinv-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm
sysinv-wheels-1.0-2039.tis.x86_64.rpm
systemd-config-1.0-9.tis.noarch.rpm
tsconfig-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm
tsconfig-wheels-1.0-46.tis.x86_64.rpm
vault-helm-1.0-17.tis.noarch.rpm
workerconfig-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm
workerconfig-standalone-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm
workerconfig-subfunction-1.0-12.tis.x86_64.rpm
On 2021-05-14 4:19 p.m., Scott Little wrote:
I regret to say that all STX 5.0 build to date have been invalid.
They have been picking up unintended content from the master branch.
The problem was first spotted several weeks ago, and we thought we had it fixed, but it turns out a build optimization has kept the the invalid content in place, rather than overwriting it with the correct STX.5.0 content.
I'm working to fix fully this time. Expect to see a few unscheduled builds this weekend. I'll let you know when I'm confident of the result.
With apologies,
Scott
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss