Hi Matt, I run the following commands on compute-0. The outputs of commands have been attached. sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode > dmidecode.txt virsh nodeinfo > nodeinfo.txt /usr/bin/topology > topology.txt grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg > dmesg.txt And the StarlingX is installed with standard 0322 ISO image: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190322T174... Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie From: Martinez Monroy, Elio Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 3:36 AM To: Peters, Matt <Matt.Peters@windriver.com>; Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu@intel.com>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com>; Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing So, in order to develop our NUMA test cases, we should configure that topology in our VM’s? How can we do it? Do you have the steps? BR Elio From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 1:19 PM To: Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>>; Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com<mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hello, From the output below, this data is taken from a virtual system. In a QEMU/KVM environment, it is not expected to have a NUMA topology unless it has been explicitly configured in the domain configuration of the emulated host. I’m assuming the tests being performed by Chenjie are in a HW lab. This can be confirmed by providing the same set of data for those test systems. Thanks, Matt From: "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 2:47 PM To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>, "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>>, Brent Rowsell <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com<mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Matt Just exercising same stuff, please check my outputs from compute-0, please let me know if something else is needed sudo /usr/sbin/dmdecode Password: sudo: /usr/sbin/dmdecode: command not found compute-0:~$ sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode # dmidecode 3.1 Getting SMBIOS data from sysfs. SMBIOS 2.8 present. 10 structures occupying 419 bytes. Table at 0x000F6460. Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes BIOS Information Vendor: SeaBIOS Version: Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 Release Date: 04/01/2014 Address: 0xE8000 Runtime Size: 96 kB ROM Size: 64 kB Characteristics: BIOS characteristics not supported Targeted content distribution is supported BIOS Revision: 0.0 Handle 0x0100, DMI type 1, 27 bytes System Information Manufacturer: QEMU Product Name: Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Version: pc-i440fx-2.5 Serial Number: Not Specified UUID: 71d54a5d-b569-4e1c-83e3-9babf169e824 Wake-up Type: Power Switch SKU Number: Not Specified Family: Not Specified Handle 0x0300, DMI type 3, 21 bytes Chassis Information Manufacturer: QEMU Type: Other Lock: Not Present Version: pc-i440fx-2.5 Serial Number: Not Specified Asset Tag: Not Specified Boot-up State: Safe Power Supply State: Safe Thermal State: Safe Security Status: Unknown OEM Information: 0x00000000 Height: Unspecified Number Of Power Cords: Unspecified Contained Elements: 0 Handle 0x0400, DMI type 4, 42 bytes Processor Information Socket Designation: CPU 0 Type: Central Processor Family: Other Manufacturer: QEMU ID: A3 06 01 00 FF FB 8B 07 Version: pc-i440fx-2.5 Voltage: Unknown External Clock: Unknown Max Speed: 2000 MHz Current Speed: 2000 MHz Status: Populated, Enabled Upgrade: Other L1 Cache Handle: Not Provided L2 Cache Handle: Not Provided L3 Cache Handle: Not Provided Serial Number: Not Specified Asset Tag: Not Specified Part Number: Not Specified Core Count: 6 Core Enabled: 6 Thread Count: 1 Characteristics: None Handle 0x1000, DMI type 16, 23 bytes Physical Memory Array Location: Other Use: System Memory Error Correction Type: Multi-bit ECC Maximum Capacity: 10 GB Error Information Handle: Not Provided Number Of Devices: 1 Handle 0x1100, DMI type 17, 40 bytes Memory Device Array Handle: 0x1000 Error Information Handle: Not Provided Total Width: Unknown Data Width: Unknown Size: 10240 MB Form Factor: DIMM Set: None Locator: DIMM 0 Bank Locator: Not Specified Type: RAM Type Detail: Other Speed: Unknown Manufacturer: QEMU Serial Number: Not Specified Asset Tag: Not Specified Part Number: Not Specified Rank: Unknown Configured Clock Speed: Unknown Minimum Voltage: Unknown Maximum Voltage: Unknown Configured Voltage: Unknown Handle 0x1300, DMI type 19, 31 bytes Memory Array Mapped Address Starting Address: 0x00000000000 Ending Address: 0x000BFFFFFFF Range Size: 3 GB Physical Array Handle: 0x1000 Partition Width: 1 Handle 0x1301, DMI type 19, 31 bytes Memory Array Mapped Address Starting Address: 0x00100000000 Ending Address: 0x002BFFFFFFF Range Size: 7 GB Physical Array Handle: 0x1000 Partition Width: 1 Handle 0x2000, DMI type 32, 11 bytes System Boot Information Status: No errors detected Handle 0x7F00, DMI type 127, 4 bytes End Of Table compute-0:~$ virsh nodeinfo CPU model: x86_64 CPU(s): 6 CPU frequency: 3792 MHz CPU socket(s): 1 Core(s) per socket: 6 Thread(s) per core: 1 NUMA cell(s): 1 Memory size: 10485236 KiB compute-0:~$ /usr/bin/topology TOPOLOGY: logical cpus : 6 sockets : 1 cores_per_pkg : 6 threads_per_core : 1 numa_nodes : 1 total_memory : 9.61 GiB memory_per_node : 10.00 GiB LOGICAL CPU TOPOLOGY: cpu_id : 0 1 2 3 4 5 socket_id : 0 0 0 0 0 0 core_id : 0 1 2 3 4 5 thread_id : 0 0 0 0 0 0 CORE TOPOLOGY: cpu_id socket_id core_id thread_id affinity 0 0 0 0 0x1 1 0 1 0 0x2 2 0 2 0 0x4 3 0 3 0 0x8 4 0 4 0 0x10 5 0 5 0 0x20 compute-0:~$ grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg [ 0.000000] No NUMA configuration found From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 6:10 AM To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>>; Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com<mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hello Chenjie, Can you run the following set of commands on your test system compute hosts and provide the output for each? sudo /usr/sbin/dmidecode virsh nodeinfo /usr/bin/topology grep -i numa /var/log/dmesg From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>> Date: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Matt, I tried standard 0322 ISO image on 4 bare metals and “NUMA sections are still missing”. The docker images versions and build baseline have been attached. The ISO image link is following: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/20190322T174... Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie From: Xu, Chenjie Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2019 10:38 AM To: 'Peters, Matt' <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Matt, Sorry for misleading! I mean “NUMA sections are still missing”. I have multiple systems experiencing this issue: 1. 0306 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals 2. 0322 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals 3. 0305 ISO image on 4 bare metals 4. 0315 ISO image one 1 bare metals The item 1, 2 and 3 use same bare metals. The item 4 use a separate bare metal. I will try 0322 ISO image on 4 bare metals. Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 11:10 PM To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hello Chenjie, Can you clarify this statement? “NUMA sections missing bug still exits”. Did you mean to say that the missing NUMA sections in the domain XML are now present, but you still can’t ping over the vhost port, or are you saying the NUMA sections are still missing? Do you have multiple systems that are experiencing this issue, or is it isolated to a single system that you are having problems with the NUMA topology? I believe you mentioned that you saw the same connectivity issues on a standard load from the mirror, so that still points to a test system / environment issue. As Ghada mentioned, I think the next steps are to get results from the sanity systems with the same load baseline and to test with your custom load on a system that has been proven to work on the standard load. -Matt From: Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>> Date: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 at 9:28 AM To: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>, "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Has Elio or Rich from the test team tried the new load as well on their systems? Do they see the same issues you reported? I think we need some data for another system to compare. Ada, As part of this thread, I also requested that a VM connectivity test be added to regular sanity so that there is data from the daily cengn builds w/o the new version of ovs-dpdk. Has the sanity suite been updated? Thanks, Ghada From: Xu, Chenjie [mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 7:09 AM To: Peters, Matt; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Khalil, Ghada; Lin, Shuicheng; Cabrales, Ada; Perez, Ricardo O Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Matt, I installed StarlingX using the new 0322 ISO image for OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing on 4 bare metals. NUMA sections missing bug still exits: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378 This time I update the docker images to latest before installing StarlingX. And the docker images versions and build baseline have been attached. Could you please help review the docker image versions? Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie From: Peters, Matt [mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 8:31 PM To: Xu, Chenjie <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hello Chenjie, Comparing the image list to our labs shows a difference in the image IDs (sha), but I’m not sure if that is just a difference in build baselines or an actual difference in the images. Since some of them align, I think you might be running a different set of images. Can you confirm what the build baseline is that you pulled the images from? I have attached a sample list from our labs for comparison. -Matt From: "Xu, Chenjie" <chenjie.xu@intel.com<mailto:chenjie.xu@intel.com>> Date: Friday, March 22, 2019 at 7:25 AM To: "Peters, Matt" <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>, "Martinez Monroy, Elio" <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>, Ghada Khalil <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>, "Lin, Shuicheng" <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>, "Perez, Ricardo O" <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>, "Zhao, Forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Matt, The docker image versions in my environment and helm-charts-manifest-no-tests.tgz has been attached. The helm-charts-manifest-no-tests.tgz is built by Shuicheng for the OVSDPDK Upgrade Testing ISO image. Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie From: Martinez Monroy, Elio [mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 11:20 PM To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Perez, Ricardo O <ricardo.o.perez@intel.com<mailto:ricardo.o.perez@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Perfect, I will be cheking my mail for that new ISO. Adding Richo , he is the one that is going to execute the tests. Thanks BR Elio From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:15 AM To: Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Shuicheng, We discussed this in the networking bi-weekly team meeting today. Please re-enable the mlx pmd – re-apply the following patch: https://github.com/openstack/stx-integ/blob/master/networking/openvswitch/ce... Then please rebase to the latest master and build a new load for Ada’s team to start testing Hi Elio, One a new build is available, please start testing as per our previous plans. You need to run a networking regression on various NICs – including the mellanox. Testing was planned for about two weeks with the target for the code to merge after testing is complete by April 5. Please provide regular updates. Please also verify if you see the 3 bugs that Chenjie reports below (please test on both a cengn load as well as the load with the ovs-dpdk upgrade). Please note that none of these issues are reproducible in WR labs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821150 https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821135 https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378 Thanks, Ghada From: Khalil, Ghada Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:12 AM To: 'Lin, Shuicheng'; Xu, Chenjie; Liu, ZhipengS; Xie, Cindy; Cabrales, Ada Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest; Peters, Matt; Richard, Joseph; Winnicki, Chris; Peng, Peng; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Qin, Kailun; Guo, Ruijing; Le, Huifeng Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi Shuicheng, There is still testing planned by Ada’s team before merging the code related to networking regression. This will cover the mellanox NIC as well. Can you confirm that the load being used has the mellanox pmd enabled in it? Thanks, Ghada From: Lin, Shuicheng [mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 9:03 AM To: Xu, Chenjie; Khalil, Ghada; Liu, ZhipengS; Xie, Cindy; Cabrales, Ada Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'; Zhao, Forrest; Peters, Matt; Richard, Joseph; Winnicki, Chris; Peng, Peng; Martinez Monroy, Elio; Jones, Bruce E; Qin, Kailun; Guo, Ruijing; Le, Huifeng Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Thanks Chenjie for the testing. Hi all, Does it mean greenlight for code merge, or any other test is needed? Here is the patch list: https://review.openstack.org/642672 https://review.openstack.org/642673 Best Regards Shuicheng From: Xu, Chenjie Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2019 5:46 PM To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com<mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>>; Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu@intel.com<mailto:zhipengs.liu@intel.com>>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com<mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com>>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com<mailto:ada.cabrales@intel.com>> Cc: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>>; Zhao, Forrest <forrest.zhao@intel.com<mailto:forrest.zhao@intel.com>>; Peters, Matt <Matt.Peters@windriver.com<mailto:Matt.Peters@windriver.com>>; Richard, Joseph <Joseph.Richard@windriver.com<mailto:Joseph.Richard@windriver.com>>; Winnicki, Chris <Chris.Winnicki@windriver.com<mailto:Chris.Winnicki@windriver.com>>; Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com<mailto:shuicheng.lin@intel.com>>; Peng, Peng <Peng.Peng@windriver.com<mailto:Peng.Peng@windriver.com>>; Martinez Monroy, Elio <elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com<mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com>>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com<mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com>>; Qin, Kailun <kailun.qin@intel.com<mailto:kailun.qin@intel.com>>; Guo, Ruijing <ruijing.guo@intel.com<mailto:ruijing.guo@intel.com>>; Le, Huifeng <huifeng.le@intel.com<mailto:huifeng.le@intel.com>> Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] OVS-DPDK Upgrade Testing Hi team, I have finished the Basic Functional Testing for OVSDPDK Upgrade. Please check following summaries: Bug Summary: No bug related to OVSDPDK Upgrade. 3 bugs related to cutting over to container and configuration. https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821150 https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1821135 https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1820378 The following features have been tested: N/S traffic for FLAT/VLAN network E/W traffic for FLAT/VLAN/VXLAN network (E/W traffic within same host and across hosts) QOS Security Group MTU Best Regards, Xu, Chenjie