Hi Liu,

Thanks for the reply.
But what is the use of the application placed in the "containers" folder?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:14 AM Liu, ZhipengS <zhipengs.liu@intel.com> wrote:

Hi Mahajan,

 

You should use the second one.

  1. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz

Thanks!

Zhipeng

 

From: Amit Mahajan <ebiibe82@gmail.com>
Sent: 202097 19:11
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication deployment in R4.0

 

Hi All,

 

We are deploying StarlingX R4.0 Duplex Bare metal mode.

 

While downloading stx-openstack applications manifests and helm-charts from the public domain (CENGN StarlingX mirror), we got to the “4.0.1” release folder. Exploring it further, we found that “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” was placed at following two locations.

  1. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/containers/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz
  2. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock/outputs/helm-charts/stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz

Both the “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” placed at above paths are different (checked md5 checksum). We explored a couple of charts (heat and neutron) inside these tgz files, but only difference was in requirement.lock and that too was only in the time of generation. However, plugins/k8sapp_openstack-1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl seems different in both these files. Considering the plugin related differences, please suggest which one should be used for deploying the stx-openstack application.

 

Regards,

Amit