Sorry wrong link: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003398

 

 

From: Xie, Cindy
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 8:55 AM
To: Lin, Shuicheng <shuicheng.lin@intel.com>; Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade discussion

 

There is a separate story created by Saul on this one: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003389

 

Please sync-up with Saul if he already has patch available or you want to create one.

 

Thx. - cindy

 

From: Lin, Shuicheng
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 8:45 AM
To: Penney, Don <Don.Penney@windriver.com>; Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS 7.5 upgrade discussion

 

Hi Don,

I also was thinking drop the vim srpm. Thanks for the confirmation.

 

Best Regards

Shuicheng

 

From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 9, 2018 11:17 PM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade discussion

 

I think we can safely drop the “vim” modification. It has a long history back to where we were inheriting code customizations from another layer, which was providing its own customized vimrc that had features enabled that were frustrating.

 

 

From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2018 11:01 AM
To:
starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS 7.5 upgrade discussion

 

Brent, Saul, Shuicheng,

Let’s initiate the discussion about how we’d like to handle CentOS 7.5 upgrade, we have a master xls sheet online for all non-openStack patches analysis (@Saul, I only have Google doc link but not accessible by WR).

 

And here is the SRPM files we’ve already looked into, and believe they need upgrade. I put some columns in to fill-in more data (Shuicheng should have most of the data available). We can start from here.

 

Thx. - cindy