sysadmin +1 -----Original Message----- From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2019 10:38 AM To: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal 3 characters ;) -----Original Message----- From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 10:36 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal On 5/7/19 6:51 AM, Penney, Don wrote:
I'd vote -1 on deployadmin based on length alone. It would be nice to keep it short... less typing :)
It's only 2 characters longer than sysadmin and it is descriptive of the account. Just saying, no vote yet from me.. Sau!
-----Original Message----- From: Shuquan Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan@99cloud.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 3:44 AM To: Saul Wold Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
sysadmin +1
On May 7, 2019, at 6:24 AM, Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com> wrote:
On 5/6/19 2:43 PM, Perez Carranza, Jose wrote:
What about 'deployadmin' ? That's an interesting alternative.
Sau!
Regards, José
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Somerville [mailto:jim.somerville@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 4:08 PM To: Dean Troyer <dtroyer@gmail.com>; Wensley, Barton <Barton.Wensley@windriver.com> Cc: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Re-branding wrsroot proposal
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 1:06 PM Wensley, Barton <Barton.Wensley@windriver.com> wrote:
I guess I'm less concerned about using stx or starlingx than others. Obviously "wrs" is bad since it is tied to a company. But it seems common practice to use
On 2019-05-06 2:32 p.m., Dean Troyer wrote: the project name for the default user (think nova, neutron, glance, etc...).
The only reason I'd be reluctant to include a project identifier is because those things can change and this is just painful enough to not want to do again.
'admin' has other uses at the OS level, we need to be clear enough to not cause confusion there. Unless it has other similar uses 'sysadmin' is the best I have heard and I do not have a better suggestion.
Just to be devil's advocate here, sysadmin could easily already be in use on a future port of this stuff to another platform.
From a security standpoint, it would be on an easily guessed list of userids for black hat penetration testing.
It also shows up on the Big Username Blacklist.
https://github.com/marteinn/The-Big-Username- Blacklist/blob/master/list_raw.txt
-Jim
dt
Unless we want to use 'bikeshed' :)
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss