In-lined comments,

Greg.

 

From: "Qi, Mingyuan" <mingyuan.qi@intel.com>
Date: Thursday, March 14, 2019 at 4:45 AM
To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Cc: "Rowsell, Brent" <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com>, "Miller, Frank" <Frank.Miller@windriver.com>, Greg Waines <Greg.Waines@windriver.com>, "Xie, Cindy" <cindy.xie@intel.com>, "An, Ran1" <ran1.an@intel.com>
Subject: [Container] Ironic service containerization

 

Hi folks,

 

I’m starting the story of containerize ironic service, I’d like to add below tasks to story https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004760 in order to enable ironic service.

Add ironic chart values to armada manifest as well as static configuration.

Generate dynamic configuration in sysinv for ironic.
[Greg]
As part of this work I think it would be good to understand (and review with starlingx cores):
    - Where do we want Ironic Conductor running ?  Controller or Compute ?  Do we have a choice in vanilla upstream ironic ?
    - Is it possible to have an HA deployment of Ironic Conductor in vanilla upstream ironic ?
    - How do we set it up such that system can manage both VM Instances and Bare Metal Instances ? 
      i.e. I believe this is done thru host aggregates ?   will/can these be setup as part of starlingx system overrides ?

Greg.

Adding ironic chart to armada chart group to switch on ironic service for stx-openstack application.

Should this be default in stx-openstack armada manifest?

I’m not sure whether to add this task here or to a specific openstack component cleanup story.

 

And speaking of the test, the first choice is to deploy starlingx standard config on bare metal because of the connection to ipmi, but it will take long time for testing. Did anyone get the chance to have ipmi/BMC enabled in vm (or it’s not possible)?

 

Best Regards,

Mingyuan