One other concern. I'm surprised that there aren't more patches being refactored in the inspections seen so far. When I've done this job in the past, it was my policy that our patches apply cleanly with no 'fuzz'. Scott On 18-08-14 09:21 AM, Scott Little wrote:
On rare occasions it can produce an issue. Would likely requires a case where our patches modify a -devel rpm in a way that changes how other packages compile.
While I'd prefer to see the competing binary rpms removed sooner rather than later, I can settle on a follow up story.
Scott
On 18-08-14 07:38 AM, Lin, Shuicheng wrote:
Hi Scott,
I created below story to track the rpm compete you mentioned in comments. I prefer to do it after CentOS7.5 upgrade, since it is a minor refine, not an issue fix.
Is my understand correct?
https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2003435 <https://storyboard.openstack.org/#%21/story/2003435>
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss