Good idea, but let's deal with integ first.
I meant "deployment"
From: Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech@windriver.com>
Sent: June 7, 2023 9:05 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Input needed - split starlingx/tools git repo into multiple
 
We should also consider separate repo(s) for config files like ...
stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config
Good idea, but let's deal with integ first.
From: Scott.Little <scott.little@eng.windriver.com>
Sent: June 1, 2023 11:29 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Input needed - split starlingx/tools git repo into multiple
 
+1 on 'deployment'

We should also consider separate repo(s) for config files like ...
stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config
stx-tools/debian-mirror-tools/config


Scott


On 2023-05-31 11:06, Panech, Davlet wrote:
Good day,

We are considering splitting the git repository starlingx/tools into multiple. Reason: it contains files & scripts from unrelated domains and it is difficult to find Git reviewers whose expertise covers all of them.

At a minimum, I suggest we separate out the "deployment" directory in its own repository.

Would it make sense to separate out any other directories?

D.

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io