Here is an update on 99Cloud’s work on OpenStack patch upstreaming. The master spreadsheet has been updated to reflect this update.
They are requesting help on a couple of the line items:
Line 27 primary: server-groups best-effort and group size: Server group soft-affinity is achieved in pike version, why not to use it but to develop the best-effort?
And what is the server group size used for, I can't think about a necessary scene to finish the spec.
Line 37 Configurable auto page refresh: Can someone (@Dean, @Frank) send the un-squashed patches to Shuquan please?
brucej
From: Shuquan Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan@99cloud.net]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 1:59 AM
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>
Cc: 王亚 <wang.ya@99cloud.net>;
朱博祥 <zhu.boxiang@99cloud.net>;
张鲲鹏 <zhang.kunpeng@99cloud.net>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Distro.openstack meeting notes Mar 12th 2019
Hi Bruce,
This is the updated from 99Cloud.
6 |
vCPU model |
Ya Wang |
Because the feature is frozen, this spec has to be deferred to the train release. Last week I submit two patches into review system, the main work was refactor part of libvirt driver’s code
and add a public method in scheduler utils to get flavor traits. Now the review is pause because we have to wait for re-proposed spec merged. The spec has one +2. |
20 |
rbd disks: convert from source format to raw Intel to fix upstram |
Boxiang Zhu |
Last week, Matthew suggested to remove the LVM related changes out of the patch. He thought that it might be easier to split it into a separate follow-up patch,
as this is the change that will require a release note. Therefore, I have split it into two patches. And I also added some unit tests and improved the release notes. Just ready for review. I will ping Matthew and some other nova core reviewers to review the
patch. |
23 |
Do not bypass scheduler when using forced hosts |
Boxiang Zhu |
I have pushed a patch to the review system. But it still need more time to discuss with nova community to find whether it is suitable. |
25 |
Live block migration fails following auth token expiration |
Ya Wang |
The bug has been solved and I’ve verified it. On the other hand, I’ve submit a patch to update the nova’s document. The reason for the previous failure is because
the service user's role does not match the config item: service_token_roles which is not clear in the document. |
26 |
Drop support for forced hosts for live migrate |
Boxiang Zhu |
The bug has been solved and I’ve verified it. The nova community has the same bp like 'remove-force-flag-from-live-migrate-and-evacuate'. The bp adds a micro version(named
as 2.68) of api to remove the force flag. I have test the function by myself. And it will not accept the force flag if I specify the os-compute-api-version is 2.68. So I think the bp completely meets our requirements. |
27 |
Unsquash: primary: server-groups best-effort and group size |
Kupeng Zhang |
This patch contains two features, best-effort server group and group size. The best-effort feature is similar to soft-affinity/soft-anti-affinity of server group
in nova community, and the group size is a new feature which need to submit a spec. We are discussing how to work for them. There are two questions to ask. Server group soft-affinity is achieved in pike version, why not to use it but to develop the best-effort?
And what is the server group size used for, I can't think about a necessary scene to finish the spec. |
37 |
Configurable Auto Page Refresh |
Kupeng Zhang |
I can’t get the patch from the link in the excel. It’s inside the intel github. Could you send this to us? |
On Mar 12, 2019, at 10:24 PM, Shuquan Huang <huang.shuquan@99cloud.net> wrote:
Sorry, I didn’t notice it shifts to PDT. I’ll summary the progress from my side and send it out tomorrow.
On Mar 12, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> wrote:
It’s over. All meetings shifted one hour earlier due to the US/Canada time change.
From: Shuquan
Huang [mailto:huang.shuquan@99cloud.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 7:08 AM
To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Distro.openstack meeting notes Mar 12th 2019
Hi Bruce,
It seems I can’t join the meeting. It shows “The host has another meeting in progress”
Is the meeting rescheduled?
From: <starlingx-discuss-bounces+huang.shuquan=99cloud.net@lists.starlingx.io>
on behalf of "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>
Date: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM
To: "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Distro.openstack meeting notes Mar 12th 2019
·
·
·
§
§
·
·
·
·
·
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
<image001.png>
<image002.png>
黄舒泉 Shuquan Huang
技术总监 Technical Director
九州云信息科技有限公司 99Cloud Co. Ltd.
邮箱(Email): huang.shuquan@99cloud.net
手机(Mobile): +86-18616211612
电话(Tel): 021-61207665
地址(Addr): 上海市局门路427号1号楼206
Room 206, Bldg 1, No.427 JuMen Road, ShangHai, China
网址(Site): http://www.99cloud.net