Thanks Ricardo. Haitao and Shuai will follow up with you for the progress we've made from China side. Thx. - cindy From: Perez, Ricardo O Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 7:07 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com> Subject: StarlingX QAT validation progress Hi super StarlingX team, In the following document, you can find the progress about QAT + StarlingX validation in a 2+2 system. Overall, some blockers that we have been facing to get more progress is the stability of the latest ISOs. However, we have at least executed 4 successfully test cases: QAT_StarlingX_001 Verify that QAT PCIe module doesn't generate any StarlingX installation issue QAT_StarlingX_002 Verify that QAT module can be listed via lsmod QAT_StarlingX_003 Verify that QAT driver / service is up and running QAT_StarlingX_004 Verify newly added system inventory commands to support crypto device For all the details about the remaining test cases, expected coverage, and results, please take a look here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TEjHB5JCYKFUwf2TM4D23OIA-9huYhGZrokZ... Also feel free to add any comment / input related to such tests that you might consider important to improve them. Thanks in advance -Ricardo (a.k.a. Richo)