Thank you Susendra. Agree that the current de-branding changes should merge in an orderly way. For the “References to Titanium, cgcs, tis” I suggest that we focus on the changes that are visible to end users first, e.g. messages written to log files. I think changing text in source code comments and other innocuous places is not a priority. Suggest doing the changes in batches so they can be reviewed easily. brucej From: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj@intel.com> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 9:37 AM To: scott.little@windriver.com; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: FW: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Debranding Hello Scott, Bruce, Below is the information gathered on De-branding – Story board: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006387 · Merged: Changes to .spec & .service files. · Review: Blocked on workflow label, Needs workflow label ?? · Todo: starlingx/ha (no reference), stx-tools, starlingx/update Existing De-brand Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:+open+branch:master+topic:debrand_wip · Removal of stx-r1 & pike changes are also part of this topic. · File extensions include - .xml, .py, Dockerfile, .rst, buildrc, .sh, generate-cgcs-tis-repo, make* Current Analysis - Flock layer path: /localdisk/designer/stx40/flock/cgcs-root/ · References to 'Titanium' included in below file types - o .py, .h, .cpp, .yaml, .cfg, .txt, .rst o .bash_completion, PKG_INFO, hwmon, hbsAgent, mtcAgent, *password*, *collect*, .ocf · References to Titanium, cgcs & tis Baseline path References (w/o binary files) Count Distinct Files (w/o binary files) Count /localdisk/designer/stx40/flock/ grep -rnsw -I "Titanium" ./* | wc 120 grep -rnsw -I -l "Titanium" ./* | w 77 /localdisk/designer/stx40/flock grep -rnsw -I "cgcs*" ./* | w 483 grep -rnsw -I -l "cgcs*" ./* | wc 151 /localdisk/designer/stx40/flock grep -rnsw -I "tis*" ./* | w 3194 grep -rnsw -I -l "tis*" ./* | wc 91 We can start with merging the existing De-brand topic. Please let me know for comments. Regards, Susendra. From: N, Poornima Y <poornima.y.n@intel.com<mailto:poornima.y.n@intel.com>> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 11:59 AM To: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj@intel.com<mailto:susendra.selvaraj@intel.com>> Subject: FW: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Debranding From: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com<mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 10:19 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Debranding Scott, thank you for taking up the lead on this. I support the effort, as it has benefits both for cleaning up the code and for removing the need to explain just what a cgcs is. I encourage the community to actively support Scott, reviewing the patches and helping move this forward. brucej From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com<mailto:scott.little@windriver.com>> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2020 8:19 AM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] [Build] Debranding We need a thread for the discussion of Debranding. Interested parties should reply here. Intent is the removal of references to cgcs, tis, Titanium, stx-r1 and pike from the code base and it's supporting build systems. Some of work will impact the CENGN build service, and might impact automated test resources as well. We'll need to progress slowly and carefully, and have backward compatibility kept in mind for the near term. Story board: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006387 <https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006387> Review Topic: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:+open+branch:master+topic:debrand_wip <https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:+open+branch:master+topic:debrand_wip>