If there are more than a couple of minutes of build issues to be discussed again today, I suggest we move them to the end of the community call so those who aren't involved in the discussion can drop.  Or move the discussion out of the community call altogether.

Bill...

-----Original Message-----
From: Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 9:56 PM
To: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Jascanu, Nicolae <nicolae.jascanu@intel.com>; Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] 4.0 Layered Build Status?

On 7/21/20 6:32 PM, Khalil, Ghada wrote:
> Hi Nick,
> I have not seen a sanity for the 4.0 branch w/ the layered build.
>
That's because we have not gotten a good build in the past week due to issues with Cengn and getting Jenkins configured correctly.

> Saul/Davlet,
> Can you please clarify the cadence of both the 4.0 monolithic and 4.0 layered builds?
>
We shifted the build team meeting and had it this morning, the notes can be found in the build team etherpad[0]. The short version is that Davlet has been looking into the current issue (missing helm charts), not sure of the status there.

Frank is considering if we can release with only Monolithic build for
stx4 and not support layered, I think it's important that we follow through on the layered build plan for 4.0.

Layered should be building nightly, monolithic for 4.0 was on-demand and is should be rebuilt today (again, not sure of the status), I don't see a build yet.

We will no doubt spend sometime on this in the community and release meeting this week.

Sau!

[0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/stx-build

> Thanks,
> Ghada
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Saul Wold [mailto:sgw@linux.intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2020 2:12 PM
> To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] 4.0 Layered Build Status?
>
>
>
> On 7/15/20 10:48 PM, Panech, Davlet wrote:
>> Containers are building now -- its 2am here, I won't be able to check
>> its status till tomorrow morning. It should be done in a few hours,
>> if all goes well.
>
> Thanks for the extra effort here.
>
> I think that I owe you a beer or three, here's one to start with!
>
>       .-.
>             (, )O()
>            ( )O.( ')o.
>            |XXXXXXXX|O
>          __|//\\//\\|o
>         /.-|\\//\\//|
>        ||  |//\\//\\|
>         \'-|\\//\\//|
>          `"|//\\//\\|
>        jgs |XXXXXXXX|
>            `""`""`""`
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sau!
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --
>> *From:* Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech@windriver.com>
>> *Sent:* July 15, 2020 9:11 PM
>> *To:* Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>; Little, Scott
>> <Scott.Little@windriver.com>; Miller, Frank
>> <Frank.Miller@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
>> <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Starlingx-discuss] 4.0 Layered Build Status?
>> I just started flock, after that -- containers. I don't know if they
>> will finish in time. I'll check before I go to bed tonight and report here.
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --
>> *From:* Saul Wold <sgw@linux.intel.com>
>> *Sent:* July 15, 2020 8:41 PM
>> *To:* Panech, Davlet <Davlet.Panech@windriver.com>; Little, Scott
>> <Scott.Little@windriver.com>; Miller, Frank
>> <Frank.Miller@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
>> <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
>> *Subject:* 4.0 Layered Build Status?
>>
>> Davlet, Scott:
>>
>> I just looked on Cengn and the 4.0 build seems to have run in
>> compiler and distro, but I don't see the flock build for the layered
>> portion. I see what looks like another Monolithic build that
>> completed at 1740Z today (4/15).
>>
>> Can anyone provide an update?  Will the QA team have a Layered build
>> to run Sanity on tomorrow their time?
>>
>> Thanks
>>       Sau!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
>> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
>> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlingx-discuss mailing list
> Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
>

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss