Thanks Elio. I do have some questions below about the bugs, but they don't gate proceeding with the release/labeling. Scott, Please label the branch and update the CENGN build accordingly (move from rc to release). Please let us know when done. Thanks, Ghada -----Original Message----- From: Martinez Monroy, Elio [mailto:elio.martinez.monroy@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2019 2:20 PM To: Khalil, Ghada; Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada Subject: Consoolidated stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build testing Consolidated Regression Automated Results Report Configuration: • Virtual Environment • 4 configurations (Simplex, Duplex, Standard, External) • ISO: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/rc/2.0/centos/20191005T150... Results: PASS 87.00 125.00 153.00 153.00 FAIL 6.00 11.00 12.00 9.00 TOTAL EXECUTED 93.00 136.00 165.00 162.00 PASS RATE 93.54 91.911 92.72 94.44 TP: • https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r5VIUq-6z3I3nWB_Bo4a4ZnUhsVZfatPM4W8... Ovservations: • Inestability in some scenarios because of WS resources, in some configurations passes and with larger configurations fails. • We are getting the following known issues o https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1836378 [[GK]] This was initially reported as a very intermittent issue and is currently not gating for stx.2.0. What's the frequency of occurrence? Does another lock/unlock attempt recover the issue? We need to decide if we should make this stx.2.0 gating and target a fix for a subsequent maintenance release. o https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1841660 [[GK]] Same as above. Is this an intermittent issue? What's the frequency of occurrence? Previously this was reported once and therefore is not currently marked as gating for stx.2.0. We need to decide if we should make this stx.2.0 gating and target a fix for a subsequent maintenance release. o https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1835807 [[GK]] This is already marked as stx.2.0 gating, but there is no fix in sight. It appears to be a rabbitmq issue. o https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1834512 [[GK]] This functionality was not implemented Conclusions: • 2.0.1 Maintenance RC is healthy -----Original Message----- From: Khalil, Ghada <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com> Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 10:44 AM To: Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build Requested Thanks Scott. Hi da/team, Can you please start the planned sanity/regression testing? Thanks, Ghada -----Original Message----- From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little@windriver.com] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2019 1:08 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] stx.2.0.1 maintenance RC build Requested We finally have a good build! Happy Testing. Scott _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss