Thanks, Don for the details. We will do as instructed and ensure the test is done correctly.
Thx. - cindy
From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 6:01 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; Liu, Yang <yang.liu@windriver.com>
Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; Waheed, Numan <Numan.Waheed@windriver.com>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com>
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi Cindy,
In a successful case, you should see a TFTP log in daemon.log on the active controller indicating the file was transferred, such as:
2019-02-12T13:20:45.000 controller-0 dnsmasq-tftp[200877]: info sent /pxeboot/EFI/grubx64.efi to 192.168.204.4
I would suggest doing something like “tail -f /var/log/daemon.log | grep -i tftp” while doing the installation of nodes from the active controller, to verify the expected file is getting transferred. If the host
installs and you don’t see this file transferred, I’d recommend reconfirming that the node is installing via UEFI.
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2019 4:46 PM
To: Liu, Yang
Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan; Little, Scott
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang
Sorry about the issue! It’s interesting as I did have my engineer tested the scenarios. There must be something missing from my side.
We will redo the patch and test. In the same time, can you manually change the file permissions as temporarily workaround and unblock the test cycle?
Thanks! Cindy
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 14, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Liu, Yang <yang.liu@windriver.com> wrote:
Hi Cindy,
We are still seeing the same file permission issue for grubx64.efi under pxeboot/EFI, causing UEFI pxeboot to fail.
We need the grubx64.efi to be readable by others as well.
../pxeboot/EFI/
total 1220
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 .
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 ..
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 centos
-rwx------ 1 jenkins mock 1233016 Feb 12 16:37 grubx64.efi
The patch seems to have changed the dir permission for centos from 700 to 755, but not grubx64.efi.
For the dir permission for centos, I believe the original 700 should be sufficient (@Scott, please correct me if it’s wrong).
BR,
Yang
From: Liu, Yang
Sent: February-12-19 9:00 AM
To: 'Xie, Cindy'; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Thanks Cindy. Will do.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-11-19 8:10 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Numan/Yang,
The last pending patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634559/) which was blocking your testing (#1814360) was just merged. Please get new build ISO from Jason so you can continue the testing.
Thx. - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 10:18 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Correct.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-08-19 8:28 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang,
Thanks for the report.
Are the “two node system” below referring to Duplex? Just want to confirm because #1814360 we have a patch pending and we do want to ensure it works on Duplex as well.
Th.x - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:09 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi folks,
Here’s an update for CentOS7.6 testing.
We are currently blocked due to pxeboot from controller-0 does not work for EFI. (#1814360)
We will continue after that issue is resolved.
System
NICs
Mgmt;infra;data
Special Configs
Test coverage after Install and Config
Status/Issues
Dedicated storage
X540-AT2; X540-AT2; fortville
IPv6
Sanity, nova
Completed. New issues logged.
One node system
none; none; X522/X577-AT
Sanity, basic regression
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
fortville; fortville; fortville
tboot, tpm, https,
extended security profile
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
BCM5720; Niantic; Niantic
Sriov(niantic),pcipt(niantic)
Sanity, networking
Completed. Passed.
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Low latency, UEFI
Sanity, basic regression, cyclictest
Blocked by #1814360
Two node system
Fortville; none; Fortville
Secure boot
Sanity, security
Blocked by #1814360
Multi-node system
I350; Niantic/cx3; cx3
Pxeboot script
Sanity
Completed. Passed.
Only compute-0 was used, since compute-1 has CX3 data nic.
??
CX4 on infra or mgmt, but NOT data
Won’t test. We don’t have a system have required nics.
BR,
yang