Hi Mahajan, You should use the second one. 1. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock... Thanks! Zhipeng From: Amit Mahajan <ebiibe82@gmail.com> Sent: 2020年9月7日 19:11 To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Regarding stx-openstack aplication deployment in R4.0 Hi All, We are deploying StarlingX R4.0 Duplex Bare metal mode. While downloading stx-openstack applications manifests and helm-charts from the public domain (CENGN StarlingX mirror<http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/>), we got to the “4.0.1” release folder. Exploring it further, we found that “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” was placed at following two locations. 1. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/conta... 2. http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/release/4.0.1/centos/flock... Both the “stx-openstack-1.0-49-centos-stable-versioned.tgz” placed at above paths are different (checked md5 checksum). We explored a couple of charts (heat and neutron) inside these tgz files, but only difference was in requirement.lock and that too was only in the time of generation. However, plugins/k8sapp_openstack-1.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl seems different in both these files. Considering the plugin related differences, please suggest which one should be used for deploying the stx-openstack application. Regards, Amit