I don’t understand the distinction. There is already gpl code in stx_integ.

Brent

From: Jones, Bruce E [mailto:bruce.e.jones@intel.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 1:29 PM
To: Rowsell, Brent <Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Cc: AMBARDEKAR, PRANJAL <pranjal.ambardekar@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Repo consolidation

Objection.  We separated those out to comply with software license checking tools that we will still need to run.

Pranjal and Abraham are the subject matter experts here.  If there is a way to pass the code scanning tools and still combine these, I would not object at all.

      brucej            

From: Rowsell, Brent [mailto:Brent.Rowsell@windriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 10:22 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Repo consolidation

I would like to propose that the following repo’s be consolidated under stx-integ.

· stx-gplv2

· stx-gplv3

· stx-upstream

Any objections/comments ?

Brent