Expect a more detailed query soon
It's here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-May/006726.html
For those of you who aren't subscribed to openstack-discuss... I'm not sure the best way for you to respond. I guess reply to me and/or Bruce and we'll post on your behalf?
Thanks, efried
From: Fried, Eric Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 14:24 To: Jones, Bruce E bruce.e.jones@intel.com; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: Review seeking Operator Feedback
Thanks Bruce.
Expect a more detailed query soon - we're still working out what and how to ask - but the main point of interest is something like:
Is it a hard requirement to be able to mix NUMA-aware and non-NUMA-aware guests on the same host?
If you can live without this, many things become simpler (the entire 'can_split' section of the reference spec - and the dozens of associated comments - will melt away into nothingness).
Thanks, efried
From: Jones, Bruce E Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 13:21 To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Cc: Fried, Eric eric.fried@intel.com Subject: FW: Review seeking Operator Feedback
StarlingX community: here is a link to a new spec under review in Nova that may be of interest. Eric is looking for comments and feedback, especially from operators. I’d give this review a +1 just for the title. ☺
brucej
From: Gregg, Denise D Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 11:37 AM To: Jones, Bruce E bruce.e.jones@intel.com Cc: Fried, Eric eric.fried@intel.com Subject: Review seeking Operator Feedback
Bruce – Here is spec. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/658510/
Eric – possibly can you provide some context of what information you’d be seeking from operators 😊.
Denise