I think I will open a Launchpad to track the progress on it :) Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, January 4, 2019 1:51 PM To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com>; Little, Scott <Scott.Little@windriver.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status Looking at: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build... There are still files with -stx-0.2 suffix, and some with new- prefix. The pxe-network-installer RPM is looking for the files with neither: https://github.com/openstack/stx-metal/blob/master/installer/pxe-network-ins... So it's likely still picking up the stock images, rather than the patched ones. From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2019 2:46 PM To: Little, Scott; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status Hi, Seems that the issue is still present on the last CENGN ISO: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build... Can you help me to verify if patches were integrated on the ISO? Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso From: Scott Little [mailto:scott.little@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 3:31 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status I've updated the build scripts at CENGN. We were still using the -0.2 qualified names at one point in the scripts. The next build should rebuild pxe-network-installer with the the correct kernel and ram disk. Scott On 2019-01-03 3:59 p.m., Penney, Don wrote: I've downloaded the CENGN ISO from: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build... and it does not contain the installer patches. However, the installer image here is patched: http://mirror.starlingx.cengn.ca/mirror/starlingx/master/centos/latest_build... We'll have to look at the build to see what's going on here. From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 3:18 PM To: Penney, Don; starlingx Subject: RE: STX install_state status Thank You for your help, I am using the latest ISO from CENGN and has the same issue. Do you know if there is a Launchpad already open for this issue? Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso From: Penney, Don [mailto:Don.Penney@windriver.com] Sent: Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:06 PM To: Alonso, Juan Carlos <juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com><mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com>; starlingx <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io><mailto:starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> Subject: RE: STX install_state status Please see my reply (attached) to the thread "the install progress information has missing when install computer node , storage node, and new controller node". In particular, please check that your installer has the required patch. If you're using a stock CentOS installer image, you will not get the install-state notifications. Cheers, Don. From: Alonso, Juan Carlos [mailto:juan.carlos.alonso@intel.com] Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2019 3:00 PM To: starlingx Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] STX install_state status Hi, Do someone have faced an issue with install states status when a new host is added? During controller, compute or storage host installation: system host-show controller-1 | grep install | install_output | text | install_state | None | install_state_info | None During installation several values should be showed as pre-install, installing, completed. At the end of installation the output must be install_state = completed. Regards. Juan Carlos Alonso _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io<mailto:Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io> http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss