Hi Austin,
An update about the EB that you sent us (http://dcp-dev.intel.com/pub/starlingx/stx-eng-build/314/outputs),
in summary:
controller-0:~$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
32768 60999
If I understood, we had good luck the three times and tiller port was not in use.
Please, let me know if you need additional details.
Thanks & Regards
Cristopher Lemus
From: "Church, Robert" <Robert.Church@windriver.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 12:15 PM
To: "Qian, Bin" <Bin.Qian@windriver.com>, "Lemus Contreras, Cristopher J" <cristopher.j.lemus.contreras@intel.com>, "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>, "Khalil, Ghada" <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "Perez
Ibarra, Maria G" <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com>
Cc: "Eslimi, Dariush" <Dariush.Eslimi@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
I think this is commit: https://opendev.org/starlingx/config-files/commit/fbc09b8db8a14fbf24976a0f7d8924af7a330f85
Bob
From: "Qian, Bin" <Bin.Qian@windriver.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 12:12 PM
To: "Lemus Contreras, Cristopher J" <cristopher.j.lemus.contreras@intel.com>, "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>, "Khalil, Ghada" <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "Perez Ibarra, Maria G" <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>,
"starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, "Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com>
Cc: "Eslimi, Dariush" <Dariush.Eslimi@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Thanks Cristopher,
I found the same on latest build as well.
I further look into the sys config, I found that recently the config-files/initscripts-config/files/sysctl.conf was altered, and the following was removed.
# Limit local port range
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 49216 61000
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_reuse = 1
The file is deployed to /etc/sysctl.conf, the setting is the range of local port.
Probably some changes that messed up?
Thanks,
Bin
From: Lemus Contreras, Cristopher J [cristopher.j.lemus.contreras@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 9:56 AM
To: Qian, Bin; Jones, Bruce E; Khalil, Ghada; Sun, Austin; Perez Ibarra, Maria G; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada
Cc: Eslimi, Dariush
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Hi Bin,
I checked on the configs that failed with today’s build (BUILD_ID="20191112T000000Z"), and I got this output on both:
[sysadmin@controller-0 ~(keystone_admin)]$ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
32768 60999
Which I think, causes the conflict with port 44134.
With this build, the two configs that failed are Standard with Dedicated Storage (2+2+2), virtual and baremetal environments.
Please, let me know if you need further details.
Thanks & Regards
Cristopher Lemus
From: "Qian, Bin" <Bin.Qian@windriver.com>
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 at 11:38 AM
To: "Jones, Bruce E" <bruce.e.jones@intel.com>, "Khalil, Ghada" <Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com>, "Sun, Austin" <austin.sun@intel.com>, "Perez Ibarra, Maria G" <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>, "starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>,
"Cabrales, Ada" <ada.cabrales@intel.com>
Cc: "Eslimi, Dariush" <Dariush.Eslimi@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
While the lab is still being installed, I check the collected logs. From system inventory's point of view, all nodes provisioned successfully. The impact of my commits
ends after controller-0 being provisioned (unlocked successfully the 1s time).
As Bob brought up in the comment, the port 44134 was taken by other process (as client port). it could be the rage setting of ephemeral port incorrect. I check a
couple of our existing lab, I got:
cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range
49216 61000
which excludes target port 44134 from being randomly assigned as client port.
I think it might be a good start that someone have access to the labs that failed the sanity to check the same settings?
Thanks,
Bin
From: Qian, Bin [Bin.Qian@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 8:26 AM
To: Jones, Bruce E; Khalil, Ghada; Sun, Austin; Perez Ibarra, Maria G; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada
Cc: Eslimi, Dariush
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
The 2 commits are inter related, taking one out will fail. I am trying to reproduce the issue. Not sure what exactly causes the issue yet. The commits work no difference
on virtual or baremetal.
Bin
From: Jones, Bruce E [bruce.e.jones@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:54 AM
To: Khalil, Ghada; Sun, Austin; Perez Ibarra, Maria G; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Qian, Bin
Cc: Eslimi, Dariush
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Is it possible to bisect the two suspicious commits, or otherwise figure out which parts of the commits are the root cause?
brucej
From: Khalil, Ghada [mailto:Ghada.Khalil@windriver.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 7:26 AM
To: Sun, Austin <austin.sun@intel.com>; Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada <ada.cabrales@intel.com>; Qian, Bin <Bin.Qian@windriver.com>
Cc: Eslimi, Dariush <Dariush.Eslimi@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Adding Bin explicitly to the email thread
From: Sun, Austin [mailto:austin.sun@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 4:02 AM
To: Perez Ibarra, Maria G;
starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Hi All:
About this
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1851533, after triage ,
this issue should be caused by
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/691714/
and
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/692439
after revert this commit , AIO on virtual environment can be deployed successfully
@Cabrales,
Ada and Maria : would you like to verify this by EB which reverts 691714/692439 ?
EB is available on
http://dcp-dev.intel.com/pub/starlingx/stx-eng-build/314/outputs
This change 691714 will cause
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1852155
issue too.
@Qianbin : would you double check these two issues caused by 691714/692439 gerrit ?
Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun.
From: Perez Ibarra, Maria G <maria.g.perez.ibarra@intel.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2019 1:17 AM
To:
starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Sanity Test - ISO 20191111
Status of the Sanity Test for last CENGN ISO: bootimage.iso
from 2019-November-11 (link)
Status: RED
===========================================
Sanity Test is executed in a Containers – Bare Metal Environment
AIO – Simplex
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [FAIL]
Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [BLOCKED]
Sanity Platform 07 TCs [BLOCKED]
TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ]
AIO – Duplex
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ]
Standard - Local Storage (2+2)
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ]
Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2)
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ]
===========================================
Sanity Test is executed in a Containers – Virtual Environment
AIO – Simplex
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 49 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 61 TCs ]
AIO – Duplex
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 07 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 64 TCs ]
Standard - Local Storage (2+2)
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 08 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 65 TCs ]
Standard - Dedicated Storage (2+2+2)
Setup 04 TCs [PASS]
Provisioning 01 TCs [PASS]
Sanity OpenStack 52 TCs [PASS]
Sanity Platform 09 TCs [PASS]
TOTAL: [ 66 TCs ]
List of docker images :
http://lists.starlingx.io/pipermail/starlingx-discuss/2019-November/006894.html
BUG
platform-integ-apps apply failed - tiller on Crash
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1851533
regards
Maria G