Gentle Reminder !!!!!

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

Queris: 

1. Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

2. Is there a way to separate client traffic from Storage cluster traffic (running on Mgmt+Cluster Host NW) if we enable Ceph Metadata server on Controller nodes?

Regards

Anirudh Gupta

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 3:37 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Team,

Can someone help me in regard to the below mail shared.

Query: Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Regards

Anirudh Gupta 

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 7:41 PM Anirudh Gupta <anyrude10@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Team,

I am trying to set up a Bare metal Standard with Dedicated Storage Installation R4.0 with 2 Controllers, 2 Storage Nodes and 2 Worker Nodes.

https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage.html

 As per the Network Diagram, storage nodes are connected to MGMT + Cluster Networks and all the traffic flows through this network only.

  https://docs.starlingx.io/deploy_install_guides/r4_release/bare_metal/dedicated_storage_install_kubernetes.html#configure-storage-nodes  

Even the document suggests to assign the cluster-host network to the MGMT interface for the storage nodes

system interface-network-assign $NODE mgmt0 cluster-host

Is it possible to have a storage network which is separate from mgmt+cluster networks? So that all the storage traffic passes only through that network

Looking forward for your response.

Regards

Anirudh Gupta

_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss