Hi Bob

 

For lifecycle operator, after it merge, I should update two of my patch for rook. If your patch merge in 1st and 2nd week of Jan, it only left 1 or two week for me, with basic function validation. It is very time limited for me.

 

So I wish to merge my patch firstly and I could work together with Dan for lifecycle operator.

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/720637

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/rook-ceph/+/716792

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/rook-ceph/+/765693

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/utilities/+/760503

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/ha/+/764588

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/stx-puppet/+/739363

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/config/+/758935

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/metal/+/737228

https://review.opendev.org/c/starlingx/openstack-armada-app/+/731872

 

Please review my patch.

 

Thanks!

 

Martin, Chen

IOTG, Software Engineer

021-61164330

 

From: Church, Robert <Robert.Church@windriver.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 11:26 AM
To: Chen, Haochuan Z <haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Voiculeasa, Dan <Dan.Voiculeasa@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: proposal for lifecycle operator

 

Hi Martin,

 

See inline..

 

Thanks,

Bob

 

From: "Chen, Haochuan Z" <haochuan.z.chen@intel.com>
Date: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 7:32 AM
To: "'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'" <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>, Robert Church <Robert.Church@windriver.com>, "Voiculeasa, Dan" <Dan.Voiculeasa@windriver.com>
Subject: proposal for lifecycle operator

 

[Please note this e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]

Hi Bob

 

I study patch for lifecycle operator. Something to check with you

https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22story_2007960%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)

 

1, lifecycle operator will merge in r5 release or not?

[RTC] Yes. We’ll land this prior to MS3 (1/29/21). Based on the year-end holidays, I’d like to get this merged in the 1st or 2nd week in January

 

2, propose to add a hook for APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST.

Now there is only hook for constants.APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMING_PRE, which is called before application apply.

Propose to add a hook to be called, after application apply, APP_LIFECYCLE_TIMMING_POST.

[RTC] Seems reasonable. We’ll add this as well. Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

 

Thanks!

 

Martin, Chen

IOTG, Software Engineer

021-61164330