Hi José, I ever saw this kind of issue when I added a very big disk partition (like 900 GB) on controller node by "host-lvg-modify".
And you might see some info meaningful by "fm alarm-list". In my case the message was about inconsistent in drbd-cinder.
Regards, Yong
On 12/11/2018, 9:29 PM, "Perez Carranza, Jose" jose.perez.carranza@intel.com wrote:
Hi Cindy / Austin
As I mentioned on my previous mail, I did not see the behavior mentioned on the bug, in my case the controller-1 becomes "Available" after the synchronization is finished and did not goes back again to "Degraded" mode. All my tests were done on an virtual environment.
Regards, José
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sun, Austin > Sent: Friday, November 9, 2018 7:10 PM > To: Xie, Cindy cindy.xie@intel.com; Perez Carranza, Jose > jose.perez.carranza@intel.com; Dinescu, Stefan > Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - > Duplex Virtual > > Hi Cindy: > Mhg raised bug#1798836 and I worked with him. I cannot reproduce this > issue. bug#1798836 is using static IPv4 , not dynamic . > Mhg's setup has been changed to do other test. > @Jose: could you raise bug and attach logs ( /var/log/*) in controller- > 0/controller-1 ? > > Thanks. > BR > Austin Sun. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Xie, Cindy > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 8:12 AM > To: Perez Carranza, Jose jose.perez.carranza@intel.com; Sun, Austin > austin.sun@intel.com; Dinescu, Stefan Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com; > 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - > Duplex Virtual > > So Jose, you think the issue you encountered is the same issue as > bug#1798836, my understanding correct? > > @Austin who is working on this bug may contact you for more details > including log files. > > Thx. - cindy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Perez Carranza, Jose > Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 1:37 AM > To: Xie, Cindy cindy.xie@intel.com; Dinescu, Stefan > Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - > Duplex Virtual > > Hi Cindy > > Actually I did not fill a Launchpad, I just sent the question to the mailing list, > in my case controller-1 gets available after sync (~1 hour) but I did not > noticed that after that a controller goes back to degraded mode again. > > Regards, > José > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Xie, Cindy > > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:16 PM > > To: Dinescu, Stefan Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com; Perez Carranza, > > Jose jose.perez.carranza@intel.com; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' > > starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > > Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for > > long time - Duplex Virtual > > > > Jose, > > Can you check if you reported issue is similar as the existing one > > reported > > here: > > > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1798836 > > > > thx. - cindy > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dinescu, Stefan [mailto:Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:01 PM > > To: Perez Carranza, Jose jose.perez.carranza@intel.com; 'starlingx- > > discuss@lists.starlingx.io' starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > > Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for > > long time - Duplex Virtual > > > > Hello, > > > > Depending on the size of your cinder partition and network speed > > between the two controller nodes, cinder make take some time to sync > > as it is usually the biggest partition. > > > > you can use "drbd-overview" to see the progress of the sync. > > > > Thanks, > > Stefan > > ________________________________________ > > From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza@intel.com] > > Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 4:56 PM > > To: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' > > Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long > > time - Duplex Virtual > > > > Hi > > > > I setup a Duplex virtual environment and I noticed that after > > installation and provisioning of second controller (controller-1) this > > one stays in Degraded for long time (~ 1 hour), and alarm 400.001 is > > being displayed [1], Is this normal behavior? Is here a way to take > > out the controller-1 from 'degraded' to 'available' faster? > > > > 1- http://paste.openstack.org/show/734425/ > > > > > > Regards, > > José > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Starlingx-discuss mailing list > > Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io > > http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss