Hi Cindy,
We are still seeing the same file permission issue for
grubx64.efi under pxeboot/EFI, causing UEFI pxeboot to fail.
We need the grubx64.efi to be readable by others as well.
../pxeboot/EFI/
total 1220
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 .
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 ..
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock 4096 Feb 12 16:48 centos
-rwx------ 1 jenkins mock 1233016 Feb 12 16:37 grubx64.efi
The patch seems to have changed the dir permission for centos from 700 to 755, but not grubx64.efi.
For the dir permission for centos, I believe the original 700 should be sufficient (@Scott, please correct me if it’s wrong).
BR,
Yang
From: Liu, Yang
Sent: February-12-19 9:00 AM
To: 'Xie, Cindy'; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Thanks Cindy. Will do.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-11-19 8:10 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Numan/Yang,
The last pending patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634559/) which was blocking your testing (#1814360) was just merged. Please
get new build ISO from Jason so you can continue the testing.
Thx. - cindy
Correct.
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-08-19 8:28 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang,
Thanks for the report.
Are the “two node system” below referring to Duplex? Just want to confirm because #1814360 we have a patch pending and we do want to ensure it works on Duplex as well.
Th.x - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:09 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi folks,
Here’s an update for CentOS7.6 testing.
We are currently blocked due to pxeboot from controller-0 does not work for EFI. (#1814360)
We will continue after that issue is resolved.
|
System |
NICs Mgmt;infra;data |
Special Configs |
Test coverage after Install and Config |
Status/Issues |
|
Dedicated storage |
X540-AT2; X540-AT2; fortville |
IPv6 |
Sanity, nova |
Completed. New issues logged. |
|
One node system |
none; none; X522/X577-AT |
|
Sanity, basic regression |
Completed. Passed. |
|
Two node system |
fortville; fortville; fortville |
tboot, tpm, https, extended security profile |
Sanity, security |
Blocked by #1814360 |
|
Multi-node system |
BCM5720; Niantic; Niantic |
Sriov(niantic),pcipt(niantic) |
Sanity, networking |
Completed. Passed. |
|
Two node system |
Fortville; none; Fortville |
Low latency, UEFI |
Sanity, basic regression, cyclictest |
Blocked by #1814360 |
|
Two node system |
Fortville; none; Fortville |
Secure boot |
Sanity, security |
Blocked by #1814360 |
|
Multi-node system |
I350; Niantic/cx3; cx3 |
Pxeboot script |
Sanity |
Completed. Passed. Only compute-0 was used, since compute-1 has CX3 data nic. |
|
?? |
CX4 on infra or mgmt, but NOT data
|
Won’t test. We don’t have a system have required nics. |
BR,
yang