Hi Cindy,
We are still seeing the same file permission issue for
grubx64.efi under pxeboot/EFI, causing UEFI pxeboot to fail.
We need the grubx64.efi to be readable by others as well.
../pxeboot/EFI/
total 1220
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock    4096 Feb 12 16:48 .
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock    4096 Feb 12 16:48 ..
drwxrwsr-x 3 jenkins mock    4096 Feb 12 16:48 centos
-rwx------ 1 jenkins mock 1233016 Feb 12 16:37 grubx64.efi
The patch seems to have changed the dir permission for centos from 700 to 755, but not grubx64.efi.
For the dir permission for centos, I believe the original 700 should be sufficient (@Scott, please correct me if it’s wrong).
BR,
Yang
From: Liu, Yang
Sent: February-12-19 9:00 AM
To: 'Xie, Cindy'; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Thanks Cindy. Will do. 
BR,
Yang 
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-11-19 8:10 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io; Cabrales, Ada; Waheed, Numan
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Numan/Yang,
The last pending patch (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634559/) which was blocking your testing (#1814360) was just merged. Please
 get new build ISO from Jason so you can continue the testing.
Thx. - cindy
Correct. 
BR,
Yang
From: Xie, Cindy [mailto:cindy.xie@intel.com]
Sent: February-08-19 8:28 PM
To: Liu, Yang; starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: RE: CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi, Yang,
Thanks for the report.
Are the “two node system” below referring to Duplex? Just want to confirm because #1814360 we have a patch pending and we do want to ensure it works on Duplex as well.
Th.x - cindy
From: Liu, Yang [mailto:yang.liu@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2019 2:09 AM
To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] CentOS7.6 testing status - blocked
Hi folks,
Here’s an update for CentOS7.6 testing. 
We are currently blocked due to pxeboot from controller-0 does not work for EFI. (#1814360)
We will continue after that issue is resolved.
| 
 System  | 
 NICs Mgmt;infra;data  | 
 Special Configs  | 
 Test coverage after Install and Config  | 
 Status/Issues  | 
| 
 Dedicated storage  | 
 X540-AT2; X540-AT2; fortville  | 
 IPv6  | 
 Sanity, nova  | 
 Completed. New issues logged.  | 
| 
 One node system  | 
 none; none; X522/X577-AT  | 
 | 
 Sanity, basic regression  | 
 Completed. Passed.  | 
| 
 Two node system   | 
 fortville; fortville; fortville  | 
 tboot, tpm, https,  extended security profile  | 
 Sanity, security  | 
 Blocked by #1814360  | 
| 
 Multi-node system  | 
 BCM5720; Niantic; Niantic  | 
 Sriov(niantic),pcipt(niantic)  | 
 Sanity, networking  | 
 Completed. Passed.  | 
| 
 Two node system  | 
 Fortville; none; Fortville  | 
 Low latency, UEFI  | 
 Sanity, basic regression, cyclictest  | 
 Blocked by #1814360  | 
| 
 Two node system  | 
 Fortville; none; Fortville  | 
 Secure boot  | 
 Sanity, security  | 
 Blocked by #1814360  | 
| 
 Multi-node system  | 
 I350; Niantic/cx3; cx3  | 
 Pxeboot script  | 
 Sanity  | 
 Completed. Passed.  Only compute-0 was used, since compute-1 has CX3 data nic.  | 
| 
 ??  | 
 CX4 on infra or mgmt, but NOT data
  | 
 Won’t test. We don’t have a system have required nics.  | 
BR,
yang