Scott, there is an older review in StarlingX/docs from Saul that may align with some of the debranding changes (removing pike). Can you take a look at: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/693761/ If I can help with anything on the docs side (abandon that old review and kick off a new one?), please let me know. thanks, Mary Camp Kelly Services Technical Writer | maryx.camp@intel.com -----Original Message----- From: Selvaraj, Susendra <susendra.selvaraj@intel.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 4:01 AM To: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com>; Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please Hi Scott, we could go ahead to merge patches for - Preparing the tool chain for the switch. Who could give +2 for below patches - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750467 https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750042 Regards, Susendra. -----Original Message----- From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com> Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 2:05 AM To: Jones, Bruce E <bruce.e.jones@intel.com> Cc: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please I should have that for you tomorrow Scott On 2020-09-24 3:50 p.m., Jones, Bruce E wrote:
Scott, thank you for driving this!
Are there any updates needed to the documentation (starlingx/docs project) as a result of this change?
brucej
-----Original Message----- From: Scott Little <scott.little@windriver.com> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:22 PM To: starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Debranding reviews please
I know the debranding topic still says 'wip' but the code is ready for review.
Reviews in intended delivery order ...
Preparing the tool chain for the switch ...
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750041
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750467
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750042
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749974
Then as a set ... rename cgcs-tis-repo to local-repo ...
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687401
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749997
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754129
And the next set ... rename cgcs-centos-repo to centos-repo
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/687403
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/749998
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750043
Finally
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754130
The full set for review is here:
https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:debrand_wip+(status:open+OR+status:merg...)
Thanks Scott
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss _______________________________________________ Starlingx-discuss mailing list Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss