Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

10 Nov 2018

      Hi Cindy:
   Mhg raised bug#1798836 and I worked with him.  I cannot reproduce this issue.  bug#1798836 is using static IPv4 , not dynamic . 
   Mhg's  setup has been changed to do other test. 
@Jose:    could  you raise bug and attach logs ( /var/log/*)  in controller-0/controller-1 ? 

Thanks.
BR
Austin Sun. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Xie, Cindy 
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 8:12 AM
To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza@intel.com>; Sun, Austin <austin.sun@intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

So Jose, you think the issue you encountered is the same issue as bug#1798836, my understanding correct?

@Austin who is working on this bug may contact you for more details including log files.

Thx. - cindy

-----Original Message-----
From: Perez Carranza, Jose
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2018 1:37 AM
To: Xie, Cindy <cindy.xie@intel.com>; Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com>; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long time - Duplex Virtual

Hi Cindy 

Actually I did not  fill a Launchpad, I just sent the question to the mailing list, in my case controller-1 gets available after sync (~1 hour) but I did not noticed that after that a controller goes back to degraded mode again. 

Regards,
José
...
-----Original Message-----
From: Xie, Cindy
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 5:16 PM
To: Dinescu, Stefan <Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com>; Perez Carranza, 
Jose <jose.perez.carranza@intel.com>; 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'
<starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: RE: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for 
long time - Duplex Virtual
Jose,
Can you check if you reported issue is similar as the existing one 
reported
here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/starlingx/+bug/1798836
thx. - cindy
-----Original Message-----
From: Dinescu, Stefan [mailto:Stefan.Dinescu@windriver.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 11:01 PM
To: Perez Carranza, Jose <jose.perez.carranza@intel.com>; 'starlingx- 
discuss@lists.starlingx.io' <starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io>
Subject: Re: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for 
long time - Duplex Virtual
Hello,
Depending on the size of your cinder partition and network speed 
between the two controller nodes, cinder make take some time to sync 
as it is usually the biggest partition.
you can use "drbd-overview" to see the progress of the sync.
Thanks,
Stefan
________________________________________
From: Perez Carranza, Jose [jose.perez.carranza@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 4:56 PM
To: 'starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io'
Subject: [Starlingx-discuss] Second controller on degraded for long 
time - Duplex Virtual
Hi
I setup a Duplex virtual environment and I noticed that after 
installation and provisioning of second controller (controller-1) this 
one stays in Degraded for long time (~ 1 hour), and alarm 400.001 is 
being displayed [1], Is this normal behavior? Is here a way to take 
out the controller-1 from 'degraded' to 'available' faster?
1- http://paste.openstack.org/show/734425/
Regards,
José
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss
_______________________________________________
Starlingx-discuss mailing list
Starlingx-discuss@lists.starlingx.io
http://lists.starlingx.io/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/starlingx-discuss