https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stx-cores
10/25/18
o
Welcome Curtis Collicutt and Shuquan Huang!
o
Please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611185/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610446/
o
RIght now if you are a Core for one project you are a Core for everything. Gerrit groups are being used. Brent to publish the mapping and the team can work with Ildiko to limit Cores to the projects they are Cores for.
o
We have reviewed a couple of specs now and some have gotten to the +2 step, then someone came along later with a -1 because they had a question. Not all -1's are equal. What are the community norms for reviewing specs? Sometimes
people may feel like their questions are important and might be ignored without a -1. But we don't want to block forward progress on specs. -1 votes are cleared for new patch sets but not for -2s which must be manually approved.
o
We would like the community to use -1 on specs for important issues with specs. Or important questions. It's a judgment call. This also applies to code reviews.
o
We want to finish this quickly - March is coming!
o
Bruce to turn the etherpad into a more structured document that can be used to describe the work in more detail, show which projects are effected, etc...
o
Please help review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611725/
o
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StarlingX/IA_Features
o
We will be upstream first for new features e.g. Nova.
o
We should discuss this as part of an overall Test strategy
o
Making this a sub-project is probably not the right approach. Intel may be very interested but what if we had an ARM vendor feature list? Vendors will assign resources to things that they think are important.
o
Bruce to track on the wiki but not as a sub-project.
o
Brent to cover, other project members are welcome to attend